EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs Nintex RPA comparison

Infosys and Nintex are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Infosys is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nintex is ranked #21 with an average rating of 5.7. Infosys holds a 0.9% mindshare in RPA, compared to Nintex’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Infosys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Read 6 EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA reviews

867 Views
815 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Nintex RPA

Read 30 Nintex RPA reviews

2,328 Views
2,281 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Nintex RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA and Nintex RPA are leading competitors in the robotic process automation market. While EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is favored for pricing and support, Nintex RPA is preferred for its advanced features and capabilities, particularly by those valuing functionality.

Features: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA excels in task automation and supports both attended and unattended bots with analytics capabilities. Nintex RPA offers robust automation tools, seamless cloud integration, and workflow optimization, with users appreciating its comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA could benefit from enhancing its integration flexibility and expanding its feature set to compete with more advanced solutions. Nintex RPA might focus on reducing initial setup complexity and improving user accessibility for non-technical users, along with cost-efficiency advancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, enabling efficient implementation. Nintex RPA offers flexible deployment with a range of customization options but may require more setup time. Customer service for both is effective, though EdgeVerve's approach is slightly faster.

Pricing and ROI: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is viewed as cost-effective, with strong ROI from lower setup costs and operational efficiency. Nintex RPA, with higher setup costs, offers substantial long-term ROI through its extensive features, appealing to businesses focusing on maximizing automation potential.

To learn more, read our detailed EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Nintex RPA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

28th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex RPA

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex RPA	2.2%
EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA	0.9%
Other	96.9%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2728704

Corporate Development Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Offers a user-friendly interface but lacks enterprise-level features

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is not difficult to deploy and the process was fine. Concerning deployment time, it usually takes one or two days. It totally depends upon the number of use cases and the processes where we are implementing. It might take weeks as well, depending upon the process in which we are implementing.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool follows a role-based working model to create things. It helps to track what others are doing with the system."

"The user interface is not complicated, even for new users. Two to three weeks is enough to get ahold of it."

"The features of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA that customers find most helpful include the easy understanding and good UI/UX."

"EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is more affordable than UiPath."

"Good email automation and XL automation."

"There are some typical features I like such as email automation, XL automation, some AI/ML capabilities that are evolving, but are not quite mature yet, and I like the website automation."

"AssistEdge made it so that the reps didn't need to maneuver through 10 or 20 different systems. We tied all that together in the background, so the reps had a shared UI, and everything else happened in the background without their knowledge. When they were retrieving data, it was done in the background through automation and pulling up to that generic UI layer"

"The feature I like the most is the ability to capture elements easily, especially when automating web-based applications. Additionally, I find the SAP connectors to be quite beneficial."

"The full-service automation aspects and the process discovery are the most valuable features of Kryon RPA."

"The recording feature enables us to record what we're doing, like typing or clicking the mouse, and to identify objects on the screen. We basically teach the program how to type, instead of a person. That's the most powerful feature."

"It has been a great value-add for us personally and easy to use."

"In the last month, we achieved 11,000 activities done by robot, before Kryon we did 500 each month."

"All our users have no technical background, but Kryon is really simple and intuitive and our business adapted very quickly and easily, which is why we love the system so much and are always trying to put more processes into the system and make more use cases because of the simplicity and the intuitive nature of the system."

"While we have only explored the simple use cases so far, Nintex RPA has good integration capabilities, such as working well with Gmail and Outlook to automate document handling and notifications."

"It has been helpful in reducing the manpower and error rate since we are able to run tasks 24/7 without interruptions."

"We have been using Kryon Process Discovery for about a year now. With our initial tests and monitoring just a couple people, we were able to identify 79 possible use cases within a one-month period."

More Nintex RPA pros

Cons

"We provide them with consulting and strategy advisory services, but we have never recommended any organization to use EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA."

"The solution could be improved if it provided integration with third party tools like Python, native integration, which is very important."

"AssistEdge isn't a simple tool like Blue Prism or other RPA solutions with configurable items that you can drag and drop. This involved a lot of hard coding, which posed two challenges. One, we did not have that skillset, so we depended on Infosys. Two, it's a beast to go back and update or make changes when things are hard coded because you can't just move those configurable items back around."

"There should be more activities like extraction for reading or converting PDFs. There are fewer activities compared to other tools. There are no custom activities."

"In my opinion, areas for improvement in this solution lie in handling documentation, especially when dealing with data from various layouts or formats like scanned PDFs. Currently, new features are emerging in other tools, like generative AI, that could enhance these aspects."

"Lacks integration with third party tools."

"We provide them with consulting and strategy advisory services, but we have never recommended any organization to use EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA."

"The tool's alternatives work on drag-and-drop functionality without creating custom code. We don't have an in-built queue system and use RabbitMQ for it. The solution also doesn't have a framework."

"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."

"It would be better to have [upgrades] done automatically, like an application on your smartphone. Or even if done manually, the upgrade should just be "next, next, next," and it's upgraded, rather than making it a project to upgrade."

"We need stronger governance to know, when a transaction is done, whether it worked or failed; strong logging."

"Extracting meaningful data requires significant effort. You need a dedicated business analyst who can understand the output."

"We use Google Drive a lot. If somebody sends us a spreadsheet or a document, it's going to be in Google’s format. It's not going to be in Microsoft Office format. But currently, there's no integration with Google’s documents. That would be a huge plus to have."

"From our experience, the product is not suitable for end users."

"We have found some difficulties regarding the integration with legacy systems where the screen has elements in the Hebrew language. The connection to Hebrew, right-to-left systems, is more challenging."

"The only unstable part is Studio where you build this stuff. In our version, the 5.25. It has a memory leak. If you leave it open for too long, eventually it just freezes. Saving your work, closing, and opening it just once a day is all it takes. However, this is a bug that I have noticed about the stability of the actual tool."

More Nintex RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is cheaper compared to other RPA tools."

"It is very cheap. I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."

"Compared to its competitors, Kryon RPA's pricing is very competitive."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

"For an unattended robot it's $6000 a month."

"Kryon is slightly more expensive compared to UiPath."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

The feature I like the most is the ability to capture elements easily, especially when automating web-based applications. Additionally, I find the SAP connectors to be quite beneficial.

See all answers

What needs improvement with EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

In terms of improvements for EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, there is nothing specific that could be identified as needing improvement at this time.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

The main use cases for EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA are quite diverse; it can be used within finance, banking, supply chain, insurance, healthcare, and retail. These are the prominent industries where ...

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nintex RPA?

Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?

Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 18% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 15% of the time

epiplex Automation Studio vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 10% of the time

Nividous RPA vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 8% of the time

More EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 14% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Nintex RPA

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs Nintex RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

March 2026

Download EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

March 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Also Known As

AssistEdge RPA

Kryon RPA

Overview

AssistEdge is a cohesive automation platform built with a suite of automation and AI
capabilities. It enables enterprises to realize the full potential of automation by offering
scalability, security, intelligence, and innovation.
AssistEdge suite of products takes customers across the automation journey.

AssistEdge Discover helps accelerate and amplify the power of automation through process
discovery. It leverages user key strokes and sophisticated neural network algorithms to create
an effective automation blueprint.
AssistEdge RPA provides enterprises with a holistic suite for their complete automation journey
— from process discovery to attended and unattended automation and orchestrating the
human-digital workforce.
The latest version, AssistEdge RPA 18.0, is an enterprise-grade platform that comes with
industry-leading capabilities around scalability, security, and performance. Equipped with
cognitive engine ‘Albie’, it seamlessly unifies the human and digital workforce, empowering
enterprises to traverse the ‘Automation Singularity’ journey.
AssistEdge Cloud RPA brings together the power of AssistEdge, Cloud infrastructure and Deep
Automation. Powered by standard cloud infrastructure and a flexible service model, it enables
enterprises with intelligent automation as a service and accelerates times to value.
AssistEdge Engage is an intelligent automation platform that utilizes AI and RPA to help
organizations reimagine their contact centers and achieve superior customer experience. It
provides a 360-degree view of the customers, provides insights based on past interactions and
behavioral patterns, thereby increasing customer satisfaction.
AssistEdge Community Edition is a lighter version of AssistEdge RPA designed for community
users, including students, developers, and professionals.

Infosys

Using Nintex RPA, enterprises can leverage trained bots to quickly and cost-effectively automate routine tasks without the use of code in an easy-to-use drag and drop interface. Users are now equipped with a comprehensive, enterprise-grade process management and automation solution that streamlines processes fueled by both structured and unstructured data sources.

Nintex

Sample Customers

OpenReach Service, Ricoh Americas Corporation, Event Hospitality & Entertainment

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Buyer's Guide

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Nintex RPA

March 2026

Free Report: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Nintex RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. Nintex RPA report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.