EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs NICE Robotic Automation comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Infosys and NICE are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Infosys is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.0, while NICE is ranked #28. Infosys holds a 1.3% mindshare in RPA, compared to NICE’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Infosys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 62% of NICE users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA and NICE Robotic Automation are competitors in the robotic process automation category. EdgeVerve leads in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while NICE stands out with advanced features, offering high-end capabilities despite its higher price.

Features: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA focuses on scalability, ease of integration, and robust analytics. It enhances operations through seamless background system integration and a unified user interface. An evolving AI/ML capability and excellent SAP connectors add to its feature set. NICE Robotic Automation integrates advanced AI and machine learning for sophisticated automation tasks. It supports both attended and unattended automation and offers a unique feature library for process building. NICE enhances interactivity with high graphical interfaces and supports both desktop and web development.

Room for Improvement: EdgeVerve could enhance its AI/ML capabilities further and improve integration beyond SAP systems. Additional support for newbie users in navigating legacy systems may also be beneficial. More direct data exchange between robotic agents could be improved. NICE can improve by offering more inbuilt features, reducing complexity for non-programmers, and refining its licensing model for broader accessibility. Screen connectivity can be more robust, despite good API connections. Simplification for automation creation could attract users without programming expertise.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: EdgeVerve offers a straightforward and rapid deployment process with robust customer support to ensure smooth transitions. Businesses benefit from the seamless setup of operations. NICE provides a more complex deployment process but compensates with extensive customer support and resources. This aids businesses in navigating its rich feature set effectively.

Pricing and ROI: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is a cost-effective solution, providing quicker ROI suitable for businesses prioritizing budget efficiency. NICE Robotic Automation, with a higher upfront cost, offers justified expenses through long-term capabilities and enhanced ROI. Organizations focused on extensive features and longevity may find NICE a worthy investment despite the initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. NICE Robotic Automation Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. NICE Robotic Automation

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 5.2%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NICE Robotic Automation is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere	5.2%
EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA	1.3%
NICE Robotic Automation	1.4%
Other	92.1%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer2728704

Corporate Development Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Offers a user-friendly interface but lacks enterprise-level features

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is not difficult to deploy and the process was fine. Concerning deployment time, it usually takes one or two days. It totally depends upon the number of use cases and the processes where we are implementing. It might take weeks as well, depending upon the process in which we are implementing.

Read full review

Harish G V

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Quicker compared to other bots but not very user-friendly

There is a need for NICE to be more user-friendly. It should be designed in such a way that any developer can easily develop bots. For instance, Power Automate provides a good example of a user-friendly design that NICE can learn from. Moreover, in terms of documentation, there is very little available for NICE, making it challenging to implement the bots. So, documentation should be improved as well. There are a lot of additional features that could be included in NICE. As the NICE Robotic Automation claims, it is a low-code solution, but that is not entirely true. They need to concentrate on the prerequisites and building blocks. There should be more options available internally that are easy to use and well-developed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to use, so to get started, you don't really need hardcore development skills."

"I like working with most of the commands in Automation Anywhere, such as object cloning commands. I like MetaBot for automating Citrix."

"The code automation platform is the most valuable feature."

"Easy to access: Without the need to download and install software on a local machine, we can access the RPA application from virtually anywhere."

"Automation Anywhere has save us more than $40,000 in the past year."

"Automation Anywhere has saved us a lot of time."

"In the past ten months, I have saved the work of two people and people are happy with the results."

"AA provides multiple features such as Windows actions, Database actions, Conditional Actions, Files/Folder Actions, Loop actions, Internet actions, and Clipboard actions. I have used mostly all of these features."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"The user interface is not complicated, even for new users. Two to three weeks is enough to get ahold of it."

"AssistEdge made it so that the reps didn't need to maneuver through 10 or 20 different systems. We tied all that together in the background, so the reps had a shared UI, and everything else happened in the background without their knowledge. When they were retrieving data, it was done in the background through automation and pulling up to that generic UI layer"

"The feature I like the most is the ability to capture elements easily, especially when automating web-based applications. Additionally, I find the SAP connectors to be quite beneficial."

"EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is more affordable than UiPath."

"There are some typical features I like such as email automation, XL automation, some AI/ML capabilities that are evolving, but are not quite mature yet, and I like the website automation."

"Good email automation and XL automation."

"The tool follows a role-based working model to create things. It helps to track what others are doing with the system."

"The features of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA that customers find most helpful include the easy understanding and good UI/UX."

"It resulted in over £1,000,000 in savings within that first month."

"It is a kind of desktop automation; its licensing model is a little bit different, and it tends to be individual automation specific to a role, and it excels at that."

"It is easy to deploy. To do the automation in NICE, you really need to use your programming expertise. There are no inbuilt features in it, and you have to create all the required features, which can be very interesting for a programmer."

"Through interfaces called Callout (created with HTML code) it is possible to create a strong interactivity with the user. These interfaces can be extremely dynamic in relation to the behavior of a local or remote robotic flow."

"Provides good automation features."

"It is easy to deploy because the installation packages are very simple and it doesn't require any maintenance."

"The deployment of NICE Robotic Automation is easy."

"NICE is one of the only vendors that does attended and unattended out-of-the-box. Using the unattended processes we've been able to build a "feature library." We break each process down into workable chunks that we can save into a big library. The next time we come to automate a task, we already have chunks of that automation built."

More NICE Robotic Automation pros

Cons

"I would like the ability to extract the code. You can go line by line, then open up each line of code and dig into the details, but it would be nice to extract all of the lines of code and all of the details into a document so we could read through everything. Right now, there is no way to really consume all of the code at once, except line by line, which can be fairly time consuming if we don't really know what we are looking for."

"I would like a couple more features where I can talk and the line comes up automatically."

"The EXE license is such that I can create executable files from the developer machine and deploy it; however, the file that you created can only be deployed to one system, so if you wanted to deploy this test file to, say, 10 test systems you would need 10 licenses."

"Training is good and interactive but the final certification exam is very tough and it requires in-depth practical knowledge."

"We need a better way of getting upgrades or defect fixes. It is creating problems for us, as we have to go for a completely new version. Maintaining and managing existing bots, then coming up with new ones takes a lot of time. We would rather have a batch fix than an installation to an installation."

"IQ Bot requires a significant improvement for its data detection and data retention, mainly from the previously trained documents: regarding the document's format, layout, data contained within the document, the type of data that needs to be extracted."

"When we need to upgrade the bot version for various applications like SAP, the compatibility issues could be easier to resolve. The financial team is using version 5 or 6, but the automation engineer recommends only version 6 because it is more compatible. I think Automation Anywhere could handle these compatibility issues better."

"It would be useful to have some updates for the control room in terms of analytics."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"AssistEdge isn't a simple tool like Blue Prism or other RPA solutions with configurable items that you can drag and drop. This involved a lot of hard coding, which posed two challenges. One, we did not have that skillset, so we depended on Infosys. Two, it's a beast to go back and update or make changes when things are hard coded because you can't just move those configurable items back around."

"There should be more activities like extraction for reading or converting PDFs. There are fewer activities compared to other tools. There are no custom activities."

"The solution could be improved if it provided integration with third party tools like Python, native integration, which is very important."

"Lacks integration with third party tools."

"In my opinion, areas for improvement in this solution lie in handling documentation, especially when dealing with data from various layouts or formats like scanned PDFs. Currently, new features are emerging in other tools, like generative AI, that could enhance these aspects."

"The tool's alternatives work on drag-and-drop functionality without creating custom code. We don't have an in-built queue system and use RabbitMQ for it. The solution also doesn't have a framework."

"We provide them with consulting and strategy advisory services, but we have never recommended any organization to use EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA."

"We haven't found it to be as powerful as some of the other platforms. From a true RPA perspective, it is pretty far behind some of the other solutions."

"There is a need for NICE robotics to be more user-friendly."

"[During the upgrade] any issues, where it couldn't remotely connect to upgrade, I needed the floor plan so I could go to that PC and have a look at it. Often it was either that the PC was switched off or had a bug or some other application needed to be reset."

"It is a bit clunky; that is the polite way to put it."

"Its connectivity with other applications should be improved. In the version that I was using, it would just stop interacting with the other application. Its graphical interface should also be improved. It should have a user-friendly interface. Sometimes, people find it very difficult to understand. One of the obstacles that I faced while programming was that if I needed any kind of help, there wasn't much content on the internet. It can be very difficult to find a solution for a particular issue."

"The solution is not as intuitive as it could be and the integration took a lot of time."

"The one thing I'd like to see, and NICE is already heavily investing in it, is improvement in the user interface itself. They call it the Designer and it's what the developers use. It is a bit clunky; that is the polite way to put it. I'd like to see it be a bit more user-friendly, a bit more intuitive, and to move to something a bit more web-based..."

"There are a few areas for improvement in the installation phase"

More NICE Robotic Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Whatever investment, licensing, and resource costs together are put in for development and delivery, we are still at an ROI of 250 percent."

"We have saved customers 400% in terms of time saved by implementing this product."

"If you look at the capital expenditure, Automation Anywhere is number two to UiPath. But if you take a long-term view, on a scalable model of a large number of bots coming out, it slowly goes on to become the costliest tool. There is something they can do about that. The capital expenditure goes out right at the point of buying the tool. For Automation Anywhere, I would need to spend $20,000. UiPath can give me something for $6,000, while Blue Prism will come in at $300,000."

"I feel the cost of licensing is very high for the A2019 version."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are about $80,000. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"Regarding the price, licensing, and maintenance, Automation Anywhere provides its customers with its best and affordable value."

"This is a value for the money product."

"We have established a CoE and we take our bot opportunities based on their ROIs. The best ROI opportunity goes to development first. Our ROI opportunities are compliance, profitable growth, productivity enhancements, productivity gains, number of hours the productivity saved, and resources not available that the work can be done by the bot. However, the single most important criteria that we use to measure ROI is how much time does the bot cut down from an analyst's work, as this has the best ROI. E.g., if an analyst is spending a 100 hours of work that a bot can do in one hour, we calculate the 99 hours saved as ROI."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is cheaper compared to other RPA tools."

"As per my understanding, UiPath has a much lesser cost than NICE, but I am not sure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

14%

Construction Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	161
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	562

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

What needs improvement with EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

In terms of improvements for EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, there is nothing specific that could be identified as needing ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

The main use cases for EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA are quite diverse; it can be used within finance, banking, supply cha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

Regarding the reporting capabilities of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, I am not certain about the intelligent reporting ca...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

WorkFusion vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Robocorp vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Platform vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 8% of the time

HyperScience vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 8% of the time

ElectroNeek vs EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA

Compared 4% of the time

More EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA Competitors

Blue Prism vs NICE Robotic Automation

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Platform vs NICE Robotic Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Hyland RPA vs NICE Robotic Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Blue Prism Cloud vs NICE Robotic Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition vs NICE Robotic Automation

Compared 3% of the time

More NICE Robotic Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

October 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

October 2026

Download EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA product report

Buyer's Guide

NICE Robotic Automation

October 2026

Download NICE Robotic Automation product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

AssistEdge RPA

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Infosys

Demo not available

NICE

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA offers robust automation capabilities with AI/ML enhancements, seamless legacy integration, and user-friendly elements, effectively supporting industries like finance and healthcare.

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is known for its versatility in automating processes across sectors like finance, banking, and healthcare. With email, XL automation, and evolving AI capabilities, it integrates seamlessly with systems and features role-based models, web application element capture, and SAP connectors. Despite needing improvements in third-party integration, AI, and support, it remains accessible due to its adaptive UI, though scalability and documentation handling require attention. Complex automation can be challenging, leading users to often need custom packages beyond predefined activities.

What are the key features of EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA?

Email and XL automation: Streamlines document processing tasks.
AI/ML capabilities: Supports evolving industry needs with advanced intelligence.
Web automation: Facilitates internet-based task automation efficiently.
Legacy system integration: Ensures smooth operations with existing infrastructure.
Role-based working model: Supports diverse team dynamics and accountability.
Easy element capture for web: Simplifies web automation tasks with point-and-click efficiency.
SAP connectors: Enhances SAP ecosystem automation capabilities.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Ease of use: Empowers teams to adapt quickly with minimal training.
Adaptability: Supports diverse requirements with flexible capabilities.
Database integration: Facilitates seamless data management and processing.
Uncomplicated UI/UX: Ensures a smooth user experience for quick onboarding.

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA is extensively implemented in industries like finance and healthcare for automating business processes such as payments and data comparison. It supports custom UI development for contact centers and enhances efficiency in areas like supply chain and retail through web scraping and automation, addressing unique industry needs efficiently.

Infosys

NICE Robotic Automation offers a customizable platform with visual interfaces and efficient desktop automation, providing seamless API connectivity and strong graphical interaction for organizations across industries.

Designed for comprehensive automation needs, NICE Robotic Automation enables organizations to deploy quickly with customizable visual interfaces and license-specific automation. Despite the complex interface and need for specialized IT skills, it integrates effectively with platforms like ServiceNow. Task automation segmentation, dynamic user interactivity, and multiple robotic flows management make it an ideal choice for those seeking efficient execution speed and unique feature-based builds. However, improvements in enterprise features, RPA capabilities, and user-friendliness are necessary, with a clunky designer interface and unreliable connectivity as drawbacks.

What are the key features of NICE Robotic Automation?

Customizable Visual Interfaces: Offers tailored interfaces that enhance the user's experience during setup.
Quick Deployment: Provides rapid implementation times for faster results.
Efficient Desktop Automation: Streamlines desktop processes with speed.
Seamless API Connectivity: Ensures smooth and effective integration with APIs.
Dynamic User Interactivity: Facilitates strong engagement with active interfaces.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Execution Speed: Look for feedback on quick task completion.
Feature Uniqueness: Reviews often mention the distinctiveness of the feature set.
Integrative Capacity: Consider how well it connects with other systems.
Cost Efficiency: Evaluate return on investment through user perspectives.

Organizations deploy NICE Robotic Automation in industries like customer service and financial centers, implementing agent guidance, compliance during calls, and desktop processes. Integration with systems such as ServiceNow supports tasks like ticket processing and data extraction, with plans often extending to cloud platforms like Amazon AWS.

NICE

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

OpenReach Service, Ricoh Americas Corporation, Event Hospitality & Entertainment

HelpLine, Telefonica Spain, Banca Popolare Di Sondrio

Buyer's Guide

EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. NICE Robotic Automation

September 2026

Free Report: EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. NICE Robotic Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. NICE Robotic Automation and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA vs. NICE Robotic Automation report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.