Digital Guardian vs Zscaler Client Connector comparison

Fortra and Zscaler are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Fortra is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zscaler is ranked #51 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Digital Guardian

Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews

3,211 Views
899 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Zscaler Client Connector

Read 2 Zscaler Client Connector reviews

216 Views
205 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

Zscaler Client Connector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Digital Guardian and Zscaler Client Connector compete in the network protection category. Based on data comparisons, Zscaler Client Connector tends to have the upper hand due to its seamless network architecture integration and scalable cloud-native security structure.

Features: Digital Guardian offers robust data classification, encryption, and threat detection across endpoints and networks. Zscaler Client Connector emphasizes secure internet access, zero trust network access, and expansive scalability with its cloud-native design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian provides a structured deployment process with dedicated support options essential for implementing data security solutions. Zscaler Client Connector features a simpler cloud-based deployment, promoting faster system integration without requiring extensive hardware, and offers strong customer service for smooth deployment transitions.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian may incur higher upfront costs, affecting initial ROI, but its data security precision can justify these investments over time. Zscaler Client Connector offers a flexible pricing structure reflective of its cloud services, often resulting in better immediate ROI due to lower entry costs and broad security coverage.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. Zscaler Client Connector Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. Zscaler Client Connector

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

41st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (13th), Endpoint Encryption (8th), Mobile Data Protection (6th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd)

Zscaler Client Connector

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

51st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

Carlos Snel

Director at Aquila ICT Solutions

Allows our IT department to easily analyze any connection issues

There is room for improvement regarding the price of Zscaler Client Connector, as it is one of the most expensive solutions available. Additionally, more data centers are required globally to reduce latency, especially in areas like South America and Africa, though this does not directly relate to the Client Connector.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."

"It has been scalable."

More Digital Guardian pros

"Zscaler Client Connector is quite scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine or ten out of ten."

"The solution operates in the background seamlessly without the user noticing."

"I'd rate the solution nine out of ten."

Cons

"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."

More Digital Guardian cons

"There is room for improvement regarding the price of Zscaler Client Connector, as it is one of the most expensive solutions available."

"The stability of Zscaler Client Connector needs improvement, as it often disconnects and reconnects."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler Client Connector?

Zscaler Client Connector is notably costly, with pricing rated at five out of ten in terms of affordability, reflecting the premium pricing of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler Client Connector?

The stability of Zscaler Client Connector needs improvement, as it often disconnects and reconnects. An enhancement to increase stability would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zscaler Client Connector?

I use Zscaler Client Connector ( /products/zscaler-client-connector-reviews ) when working from home to access my work applications. It allows me to connect to the VPN, enabling access to internal ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

Mimecast Incydr vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 56% of the time

Tanium vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 24% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Zscaler Client Connector

Compared 20% of the time

More Zscaler Client Connector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

July 2025

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Zscaler Client Connector product report

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

Zscaler Client Connector streamlines secure remote access by addressing security needs with scalable solutions, improving network performance. It is crucial for businesses seeking comprehensive network protection and seamless connectivity.

Zscaler Client Connector provides secure remote access enhancements by integrating security capabilities within a unified platform. This ensures that users remain protected while accessing applications or data from any location. The deployment of Zscaler Client Connector enables organizations to efficiently manage remote workforce security, enhance network visibility, and reduce latency issues. By refining user access controls, businesses can minimize risks and safeguard sensitive information without compromising performance.

What are the most important features of Zscaler Client Connector?

Seamless Integration: Simplifies the integration with existing IT infrastructure for quick deployment.
Cloud Scalability: Offers scalable solutions to accommodate growing network demands.
Real-time Visibility: Provides detailed insights into network traffic and user activity.
Advanced Threat Protection: Blocks malware and unauthorized access attempts.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Security: Enhanced protection reduces the risk of data breaches.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by reducing reliance on traditional infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Streamlines connectivity to boost productivity.
User Satisfaction: Simplifies remote access, enhancing user experience.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, integrating Zscaler Client Connector ensures compliance with stringent data protection standards while maintaining operational efficiency. The scalable design allows businesses to adapt to varying demands, providing a robust security framework suitable for dynamic environments.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. Zscaler Client Connector

May 2025

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. Zscaler Client Connector

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. Zscaler Client Connector and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. Zscaler Client Connector report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.