Digital Guardian vs N-able EDR comparison

Fortra and N-able are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Fortra is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0, while N-able is ranked #48 with an average rating of 7.5. Fortra holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to N-able’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Digital Guardian

Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews

2,823 Views
790 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Read 4 N-able EDR reviews

665 Views
645 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

N-able EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and N-able EDR are leading data protection products. While N-able EDR is noted for its features and performance, Digital Guardian is preferred for its pricing and support, which appeals to cost-sensitive buyers.

Features: Digital Guardian provides comprehensive data loss prevention, granular visibility into data usage, and in-depth security measures. N-able EDR offers advanced threat detection, an intuitive management portal, and powerful detection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian users highlight a steep learning curve, occasional performance lags, and a need for an improved user experience. N-able EDR users report a need for more robust integration options, a simplified setup process, and enhanced compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian’s deployment model is robust but complex and requires extensive support, which users find responsive and effective. N-able EDR provides a streamlined deployment but lacks comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian is praised for cost-effectiveness and clear ROI, catering well to budget-conscious businesses. N-able EDR, while potentially more expensive, is valued for its feature set, justifying its higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

44th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (13th), Endpoint Encryption (8th), Mobile Data Protection (4th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd)

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Digital Guardian	0.4%
N-able EDR	0.4%
Other	99.2%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."

"It has been scalable."

"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

More Digital Guardian pros

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"We have been using this solution for quite some time, and the AI functionality is quite advanced; we are able to provide insights on different aspects and read the reports easily."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

Cons

"Technical support could be better."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."

More Digital Guardian cons

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"The pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process. If they could bundle it as one solution and show the capabilities or features, they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

We are using N-able EDR, but I think Sophos makes sense because of the environment we operate in. The localization and different elements were important factors we were looking at. They have their ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

I am more focused on operations and procurement. The decision to use this solution was made before I joined the company. It started with patch management systems and progressed into EDR, backup mon...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 22% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

Mimecast Incydr vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

SecureTrust Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 25% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 12% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

October 2025

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

N-able EDR effectively safeguards against cybersecurity threats like malware and ransomware. With AI-driven capabilities and seamless integration with remote monitoring tools, it offers advanced protection and management for servers and workstations.

N-able EDR, known for its advanced defense mechanisms, utilizes AI and machine learning to enhance threat detection beyond traditional antivirus capabilities. It provides comprehensive visibility with its '360 vision,' integrating smoothly with remote management for unified performance monitoring. While it excels in protecting Windows environments, users seek improvements in mobile support and billing practices. A focus on enhancing licensing efficiency and reducing false positives could further enhance its usability. Ranked highly by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK, N-able EDR remains a favored choice among users for its effective threat management and detailed reporting functionalities.

What are the key features of N-able EDR?

Rollback feature: Helps revert devices to previous states after an attack.
AI models: Improve threat detection using sophisticated algorithms.
Exceptional detection and protection: Offers robust defense against multiple threat vectors.
Auto-response capability: Uses machine learning for efficient incident management.
'360 vision': Provides complete visibility of device inventories.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Comprehensive security: Enhanced detection surpassing traditional antivirus.
Efficient monitoring: Unified device management through RMM integration.
Insightful reporting: Advanced reports provide critical security insights.
Inventory management: Full device oversight with '360 vision'.

In sectors reliant on Windows-based systems, N-able EDR is deployed as a primary antivirus solution. Its advanced AI and reporting features allow businesses to efficiently manage threat landscapes. However, while it secures servers and workstations, industries requiring mobile device support may find its current capabilities insufficient, prompting requests for broader platform integration.

N-able

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR

September 2025

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.