Digital Guardian vs N-able EDR comparison

Fortra and N-able are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Fortra is ranked #61, while N-able is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.5. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to N-able’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Digital Guardian

Read 12 Digital Guardian reviews

2,954 Views
857 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Read 4 N-able EDR reviews

793 Views
777 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

N-able EDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and N-able EDR are leading data protection products. While N-able EDR is noted for its features and performance, Digital Guardian is preferred for its pricing and support, which appeals to cost-sensitive buyers.

Features: Digital Guardian provides comprehensive data loss prevention, granular visibility into data usage, and in-depth security measures. N-able EDR offers advanced threat detection, an intuitive management portal, and powerful detection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian users highlight a steep learning curve, occasional performance lags, and a need for an improved user experience. N-able EDR users report a need for more robust integration options, a simplified setup process, and enhanced compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian’s deployment model is robust but complex and requires extensive support, which users find responsive and effective. N-able EDR provides a streamlined deployment but lacks comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian is praised for cost-effectiveness and clear ROI, catering well to budget-conscious businesses. N-able EDR, while potentially more expensive, is valued for its feature set, justifying its higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

61st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (24th), Endpoint Encryption (14th), Mobile Data Protection (6th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (32nd)

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

46th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
N-able EDR	0.6%
Digital Guardian	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Syed Mubeen

IT Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Enterprise data protection has supported regulatory compliance and integrates with classification tools

In terms of functionality, many features are valuable in Digital Guardian, as the first thing for most customers is that they are using solutions such as Boldon James and Titus, which fall under the classification side, and Digital Guardian can easily integrate with this data classification solution and has a very granular level of configuration and policy tuning. Digital Guardian's data protection policies are indeed useful for my clients. Regarding Digital Guardian, I find it to be a very good solution, and in fact, it is an enterprise-level solution that has very tight integration with most of the products, with Fortra but also with others.

Read full review

Nyiko Malapane

Senior Operations Specialist at Tagit cc

Reporting effectiveness and advanced AI capabilities improve threat awareness while needing pricing simplification and licensing self-service

With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process. If they could bundle it as one solution and show the capabilities or features, they would be able to sell it more effectively, and as resellers, we could sell it to customers more easily. The technical support is responsive, but sometimes we experience limitations regarding the ability to add licensing. They could implement a self-service platform for assigning new licenses or ordering more. Currently, we depend on contacting someone who sends a new contract to sign through the process. They could change their licensing model, though I am not the right person to comment on functionality. On the reporting side, everything is covered.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has been scalable."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

More Digital Guardian pros

"We have been using this solution for quite some time, and the AI functionality is quite advanced; we are able to provide insights on different aspects and read the reports easily."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

Cons

"For vendor support, such as Fortra support, I would rate it a seven because all the support comes from different parts that sometimes have challenges meeting time zones, and sometimes they reroute to distributors and rely on partners."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

"Technical support could be better."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

More Digital Guardian cons

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"With pricing, they can improve by bundling their pricing because sometimes billing comes in a very long process."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

Regarding points for improvement, from a technical aspect, I do not see any suggestions that have come to my notice, but it is an enterprise-level product, and the issue is that it works only with ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital Guardian?

The main use case for Digital Guardian is for endpoint DLP, as it is the product for endpoint-level DLP and is one of the core requirements for many enterprises that have to follow compliance, so t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Digital Guardian?

I would recommend Digital Guardian to other users, as I mentioned, we have to see the client's existing environment, and since we are not bound to sell Digital Guardian, we are open to selling even...

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

We are using N-able EDR, but I think Sophos makes sense because of the environment we operate in. The localization and different elements were important factors we were looking at. They have their ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

I am more focused on operations and procurement. The decision to use this solution was made before I joined the company. It started with patch management systems and progressed into EDR, backup mon...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

SecureTrust Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 5% of the time

Mimecast Incydr vs Digital Guardian

Compared 4% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Security vs N-able EDR

Compared 8% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 7% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

January 2026

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

N-able EDR effectively safeguards against cybersecurity threats like malware and ransomware. With AI-driven capabilities and seamless integration with remote monitoring tools, it offers advanced protection and management for servers and workstations.

N-able EDR, known for its advanced defense mechanisms, utilizes AI and machine learning to enhance threat detection beyond traditional antivirus capabilities. It provides comprehensive visibility with its '360 vision,' integrating smoothly with remote management for unified performance monitoring. While it excels in protecting Windows environments, users seek improvements in mobile support and billing practices. A focus on enhancing licensing efficiency and reducing false positives could further enhance its usability. Ranked highly by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK, N-able EDR remains a favored choice among users for its effective threat management and detailed reporting functionalities.

What are the key features of N-able EDR?

Rollback feature: Helps revert devices to previous states after an attack.
AI models: Improve threat detection using sophisticated algorithms.
Exceptional detection and protection: Offers robust defense against multiple threat vectors.
Auto-response capability: Uses machine learning for efficient incident management.
'360 vision': Provides complete visibility of device inventories.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Comprehensive security: Enhanced detection surpassing traditional antivirus.
Efficient monitoring: Unified device management through RMM integration.
Insightful reporting: Advanced reports provide critical security insights.
Inventory management: Full device oversight with '360 vision'.

In sectors reliant on Windows-based systems, N-able EDR is deployed as a primary antivirus solution. Its advanced AI and reporting features allow businesses to efficiently manage threat landscapes. However, while it secures servers and workstations, industries requiring mobile device support may find its current capabilities insufficient, prompting requests for broader platform integration.

N-able

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR

December 2025

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. N-able EDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.