Discover the top alternatives and competitors to N-able EDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
N-able Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with N-able, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
CrowdStrike Falcon is preferred for its superior threat prevention and scalability, ideal for enterprises seeking robust security. In comparison, N-able EDR attracts buyers with its affordable pricing and excellent customer support, suiting those prioritizing cost-efficiency and integration in endpoint protection.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers competitive pricing and straightforward installation processes with robust threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR provides advanced threat-hunting and customizable policies, though it may have a complex deployment. Both offer comprehensive customer support, with N-able EDR valued for its extensive feature set.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The key difference lies in the initial expenditure, favoring N-able EDR for cost-sensitive implementations.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more affordable initial investment. The key difference lies in the initial expenditure, favoring N-able EDR for cost-sensitive implementations.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in automated threat detection and rapid remediation, making it ideal for users prioritizing automation. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its flexible integration and detailed threat insights, appealing to those needing seamless compatibility with other tools.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR presents a more complex pricing structure. SentinelOne offers a simpler cost model compared to N-able EDR's varied pricing.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR presents a more complex pricing structure. SentinelOne offers a simpler cost model compared to N-able EDR's varied pricing.
Microsoft Defender XDR excels in seamless integration with Microsoft 365 and automated threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR offers comprehensive threat identification and superior customization. Microsoft Defender XDR provides competitive pricing, while N-able EDR delivers detailed security with higher ROI through extensive features.
Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution, while N-able EDR requires a higher initial investment. N-able EDR's additional upfront expense might reflect enhanced capabilities or features.
Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution, while N-able EDR requires a higher initial investment. N-able EDR's additional upfront expense might reflect enhanced capabilities or features.
Elastic Security excels in flexible features and active threat detection, while N-able EDR offers a comprehensive suite and ease of integration. In comparison, Elastic Security's customizable policies are a highlight, but N-able EDR's detailed reporting and extensive endpoint coverage appeal to tech buyers seeking seamless, automated responses.
N-able EDR's affordability and system integration make it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR offers unmatched threat intelligence and a managed service team, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive security and operational efficiency despite higher initial costs.
N-able EDR has a setup cost focusing on scalable deployment, while Huntress Managed EDR offers an uncomplicated cost structure for small businesses. Each solution targets different segments through their unique pricing and onboarding strategies.
N-able EDR has a setup cost focusing on scalable deployment, while Huntress Managed EDR offers an uncomplicated cost structure for small businesses. Each solution targets different segments through their unique pricing and onboarding strategies.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is favored for cost-effective threat prevention and reliable support. In comparison, N-able EDR appeals with advanced threat detection and comprehensive security management, justifying potentially higher costs for those valuing in-depth analysis and robust remediation capabilities.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more structured pricing plan that requires careful consideration.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more structured pricing plan that requires careful consideration.
ESET Inspect excels in detailed reporting and advanced threat detection, making it ideal for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, N-able EDR streamlines integration and real-time monitoring for those prioritizing ease of deployment and efficient customer service over extensive threat analysis.
