Device42 vs nlyte comparison

Device42 and nlyte are both solutions in the Data Center Infrastructure Management category. Device42 is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while nlyte is ranked #8. Device42 holds a 10.7% mindshare in DCIM, compared to nlyte’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Device42 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of nlyte users who would recommend it.

Device42

Read 34 Device42 reviews

5,028 Views
1,508 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

nlyte

Read 1 nlyte review

852 Views
818 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Device42

nlyte

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Device42 and nlyte based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Device42, Schneider Electric, Dell Technologies and others in Data Center Infrastructure Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Center Infrastructure Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Center Infrastructure Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,456 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Device42

Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (5th), Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (3rd)

nlyte

Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management

8th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Center Infrastructure Management category, the mindshare of Device42 is 10.7%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of nlyte is 6.7%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Center Infrastructure Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Device42	10.7%
nlyte	6.7%
Other	82.6%

Data Center Infrastructure Management

Featured Reviews

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Read full review

Manuel Ayala

Global Datacenter Infrastructure and HPC Director at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A Software Solution synchronizing information and activities to other systems that depend on accurate physical infrastructure information

Nylte is quite intricate to use. Training someone to navigate the platform would likely require a substantial investment, ranging from one to two months for basic proficiency, followed by an additional two to three months of consistent use to gain full proficiency. Despite its complexity, I believe there is room for simplification, making it more user-friendly. While there have been improvements, there is potential for further enhancements in this area.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's CMDB, ITAM, and DCIM features create a single source of IT truth in our environment."

"Asset management is a difficult, time consuming thing, however, Device42 has helped me streamline that so I can focus on other areas that need improvement."

"Discovery tools such as Device42 are very useful for enterprise level organizations."

"It has generally been a really solid and useful tool."

"The solution's agentless approach to asset discovery is very important for us because installing agents on physical or virtual devices is not easy in our company. We have to escalate these kinds of things to different levels of security. Not having to install agents makes it easy for us."

"I've used NetBox, MyIP, and RackTables; I've used quite a bunch of these other tools out there, and honestly, Device42 is the best."

"Before Device42, the company didn't have any kind of asset management software at all, but now that we have Device42, we're integrating every single office into it so we know exactly what's where, which is a huge improvement that has probably halved the time it takes to do the management side of our IT assets."

"Device42 is a fantastic tool for workload discovery, and I believe everyone should start using it if they have plans to do so; it is a top-notch tool in the market."

More Device42 pros

"The power management aspect of nlyte provides a comprehensive overview of power consumption and forecasting capabilities. It allows for strategic planning, such as assessing the impact of adding new racks with specific power requirements. This feature facilitates considerations not only for power consumption but also for thermal aspects, including airflow dynamics between hot and cold aisles. In essence, the most advantageous feature of nlyte sfor us lies in its power management capabilities."

Cons

"My biggest problem with the product is the upgrades. First, we have to do them manually and second, not this last time but the time before that, we actually had to build a new VM to deploy the solution again. We had to back it up and then restore it to the new version. That was inconvenient."

"A con for Device42 is that Kubernetes integration is lacking. You pay for 10,000 spot licenses and if you're spinning up a Kubernetes cluster, or four or five or six Kubernetes clusters like we do, you're going to have 5,000 or 6,000 nodes in each of those, doing different types of business things."

"The dependency mapping can be quite slow sometimes, if you've got a lot of things connecting to services. It can be very slow to build up the map."

"I would rate Device42 at seven out of 10 because we need to fix it to find the devices that are not discovered."

"Device42 can be improved by adding more reporting features and architectural diagrams."

"It gets a bit confusing sometimes when you're trying to map things to a certain spot when you are trying to configure it."

"Since I was focused on deploying connectors and getting all the servers to be scanned, one of the biggest pains was when a job would fail, then the output (logging) was poor. For example, "Why did it fail?" In these cases, you get a generic error. It doesn't point you in the right direction and tell you why you got the error, which is really annoying. There have been times I asked, "Is there somewhere I can see a better log as to why is this failing?" That would be a really nice improvement."

"In my experience I believe that the key concern is the pricing strategy of the solution. Instead other solutions such as lanweber are much more cost effective. Previously, Device42 operated on perpetualysis without any fees. But recently they have altered the pricing model to include a subscription fee which I see as a very costly affair. Therefore I would like to suggest that they evaluate their pricing strategy and licence scheme, conduct a market research and ensure that they provide the right product in the market at the right price."

More Device42 cons

"Nylte is quite intricate to use. Training someone to navigate the platform would likely require a substantial investment, ranging from one to two months for basic proficiency, followed by an additional two to three months of consistent use to gain full proficiency. Despite its complexity, I believe there is room for simplification, making it more user-friendly. While there have been improvements, there is potential for further enhancements in this area."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."

"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."

"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."

"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."

"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."

"We pay $100,000 per year."

"We currently hold a perpetual license, and our expenditure is limited to support costs. While I recall that the new license model follows a subscription-based SaaS approach, I don't have the precise cost details as we are not actively using it at the moment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Infrastructure Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	20

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a small organization would be able to afford it, but I presume it would also be co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Device42?

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not think many people use it for that functionality, but if they were to expand the su...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Device42?

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine when we need to decom something in a life cycle. We use it for many different p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Freshservice vs Device42

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow CMDB vs Device42

Compared 7% of the time

NetBox.dev vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

Faddom vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Device42

Compared 3% of the time

More Device42 Competitors

Schneider Electric EcoStruxure IT vs nlyte

Compared 17% of the time

Sunbird DCIM vs nlyte

Compared 17% of the time

CommScope iTracs vs nlyte

Compared 13% of the time

Rackwise DCiM vs nlyte

Compared 13% of the time

Raritan Power IQ vs nlyte

Compared 10% of the time

More nlyte Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Device42

June 2026

Download Device42 product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Center Infrastructure Management

June 2026

Download nlyte product report

Overview

Device42 empowers enterprises with automatic IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and agentless discovery, streamlining asset management, improving decision-making, and supporting migration initiatives.

Device42 automates network discovery and provides comprehensive IT data management, making it indispensable for asset and infrastructure management. The platform’s integration capabilities, such as with ServiceNow, allow seamless management of physical and virtual environments. Its application dependency mapping is a critical feature for efficient cloud migration, while advanced search and dashboards enhance operational tasks. Device42's ease of deployment coupled with integration into cloud services offers robust operational insights and simplifies onboarding.

What are Device42's key features?

Automatic IT Asset Discovery: Enables detailed information collection on hardware and software.
Application Dependency Mapping: Facilitates tracking of application dependencies for effective cloud migration.
Agentless Discovery: Assists in uncovering assets without the need for specialized agents.
Network Topology Visualization: Assists in visual representation of network connections.
Cloud Integration: Simplifies the integration with cloud services for enhanced insights.

What benefits should be evaluated in Device42?

Improved Decision-Making: Optimizes resource utilization and boosts strategic initiatives.
Seamless Integration: Enhances connectivity with platforms like ServiceNow.
Efficiency in Auditing: Eases compliance and auditing processes.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines initial setups and deployment.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Supports better management through comprehensive data visualization.

Device42 is widely used across sectors for IT asset and infrastructure management, where automation in inventory and documentation aids compliance and resource optimization. It excels in industries requiring integration with existing systems and comprehensive network solutions. Application dependency mapping bolsters cloud migration efficiency in enterprise environments.

Device42

Nlyte is a comprehensive data center infrastructure management system designed to optimize the management of critical infrastructure. It provides insight into data center assets, enhancing visibility and operational efficiency.

Nlyte offers advanced capabilities for managing data center assets by providing real-time analytics and monitoring. With robust reporting tools, it allows users to streamline and automate processes, significantly reducing operational risks. Its focus on integration helps bridge gaps between IT and facilities, ensuring smoother workflows and enhanced resource allocation. Through intuitive dashboards and detailed data visualization, Nlyte supports data-driven decision-making, empowering users to achieve better utilization of resources.

What are the key features of Nlyte?

Asset Management: Enables detailed tracking and management of data center assets.
Capacity Planning: Offers tools to optimize resource allocation and plan for future growth.
Risk Management: Identifies potential issues to minimize operational interruptions.
Energy Monitoring: Tracks energy consumption for cost reduction and efficiency improvements.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with other systems to provide comprehensive management solutions.

What benefits and ROI aspects should be considered?

Reduced Downtime: Decreases the likelihood of outages through proactive risk management.
Improved Efficiency: Enhances processes, leading to reduced costs and higher productivity.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides real-time insights for quicker decision-making.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing data center needs, supporting long-term growth.

Nlyte is implemented across industries such as telecommunications, finance, and healthcare, tailored to the specific needs of each sector. In telecommunications, it aids in managing large-scale infrastructure. Finance sectors benefit from its security and compliance features, while healthcare uses Nlyte for efficient resource allocation and energy management. Its adaptability makes it a suitable choice for diverse operational landscapes.

nlyte

Sample Customers

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.

Visa, HP, RBC, Southwest, Verizon, Betfair, Canon, ANZ, FannieMae, AutoTrader, DHL, TransUnion, bmc, COX, Suncorp

Buyer's Guide

Data Center Infrastructure Management

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Device42, Schneider Electric, Dell Technologies and others in Data Center Infrastructure Management. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Center Infrastructure Management vendors.

We monitor all Data Center Infrastructure Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.