Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell RecoverPoint vs OpenText Availability​ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint
Ranking in Data Replication
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Availability​
Ranking in Data Replication
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint is 4.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Availability​ is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Dell RecoverPoint4.9%
OpenText Availability​1.6%
Other93.5%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Faisal_Zia - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead of Senior Directors at Net-International
Continuous data protection guarantees data safety during outages and disasters
Based on my experience, I do recommend Dell RecoverPoint to other businesses. The environment requiring Dell RecoverPoint, such as banks or telcos where data equals money, cannot afford to lose data. The overall solution rating is eight, considering the competition from one or two more OEMs giving a tough time to Dell RecoverPoint.
Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Exceed NetSec LLC
Ability to run multiple jobs to multiple locations simultaneously and offers quick recovery times
It was a very good product. It is real-time synchronization. It is a really beautiful product line. Once it is synchronized, it is a bit-level synchronization across the VPN. And the one beauty I really liked about the product line is you can run multiple jobs to multiple locations simultaneously. Usually, whether it’s electronic or any other solution, you finish one job, and then it goes for the second replication job, not simultaneously. In Carbonite Availability, you can have one DR service standby server in the head office, another one across the VPN at another DR site, and another one at a third site, like in the cloud. And all these three jobs will be going simultaneously once the initial synchronization is completed. Like, if you delete here, it just deletes everywhere. That means it’s a bit-level synchronization. That beauty, I cannot find in any other product line. It is real-time synchronization. It is high availability. That means if you delete something here, it deletes everywhere. That is the difference.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The technical support for Dell RecoverPoint is excellent."
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level, and this has been tested and is very durable."
"In terms of operational and financial benefits, in case of any disaster, it can recover."
"We have tested up to a terabyte of data, and it is doing very well."
 

Cons

"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"The support is horrible."
"Scalability is one of the few drawbacks of this thing. They're still using Flash Player to manage, and now it is extremely slow."
"The initial setup is complex."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"In the future, I would like Dell RecoverPoint to evolve as an orchestration tool that can integrate with other replication tools such as Microsoft native replication and Oracle Data Guard."
"The only thing I didn’t like about this is when you do a failover or failback again."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While I recommend Dell EMC, it depends on your specific use case. Licensing is perpetual, meaning you buy it once."
"Support is an additional subscription."
"RecoverPoint came free as an add-on to the PowerProtect Data Manager backup software from Dell EMC."
"The price is moderate."
"The product is fairly priced."
"It is considered quite costly."
"Price-wise, it’s a bit expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Marketing Services Firm
15%
Legal Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
Dell RecoverPoint is affordable for enterprises but not for mid-size organizations due to the required network investment for bandwidth across sites.
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The interfaces could be improved for better ease of use. There's also room for improvement in direct compatibility with other solutions. The version designed for VMware, RecoverPoint for VMs, simpl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Availability?
Price-wise, it’s a bit expensive. But, again, when I compare it to the enterprise segment, it is not that costly because you understand what the solution you are taking is. You’re not taking a back...
What needs improvement with Carbonite Availability?
The only thing I didn’t like about this is when you do a failover or failback again. That was the only slow process. But otherwise, it is, like one way it runs beautifully.
What is your primary use case for Carbonite Availability?
We had applications that are file servers. The file server, and then we had the Oracle application. Then we have ERP software. It’s the full server, physical server to virtual, physical to physical...
 

Also Known As

RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
Quantitative Investment Management, Peak 10, KEB Hana Bank USA
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.