Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, TeamViewer and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM).
To learn more, read our detailed Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The project management and task management features work well. It's a decent product in that regard.""The remote tool is nice. If a user needs assistance, I don't have to tell the user to do anything. I just ask the user if I can remote in, and 30 seconds later, I have remoted in. It has been really handy.""I also like how Datto integrates seamlessly with the Autotask ticketing system.""The alerting system helps us determine what are high level alerts, and what are alerts which can wait for a day or two. We catch RAID failures, hot servers, bad drives (or predicted failures on drives), etc.""AEM support is great for Macs.""Even when the connection to the server is lost, the monitoring continues without interruption.""We support nine different nonprofits, and the billing took the manager three or four days working on spreadsheets. When I finished automating everything with Datto, we cut everything down to a couple of hours. That's a substantial cost savings on the billing side.""Automation, in terms of the standard patches and standard updates, and remote support are valuable. When it does the standard Windows and patches, it works really well. This is something they focus on. Remote support is also something they focus on quite a bit, and it works really well. Being able to get to an agent or a client computer right away is very helpful."

More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Pros →

"ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP has different features and it uses one agent to execute the features of the application. In this case, the remote control, distribution software, deployment, patch management, and configuration in different systems. ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP has multi-platforms. They have recently implemented new features, such as endpoint security that incorporates vulnerability management and browser security.""Easy to manage and it looks good.""The endpoint management is great.""The features that I have found most valuable are the threats and patches element of it. We have done quite a lot of testing compared to other vendors with identifying the vulnerabilities. This means a lot more accuracy in terms of the patches and making sure it's all up to date.""The interface is intuitive, easy to use, and has a low learning curve.""The most valuable feature was the patching system to apply Windows or other programs and the ability to install operating systems in computers using the network. Additionally, it is easy to use.""The solution is easy to understand. For example, when you remoting to the user's system, you don't have that option to only log in. On this product, you are connecting to the user's computer, it prompts you for what you want to do. You can select that you want to assist the user. The user on the other side will receive a prompt stating that there is someone trying to connect to your system, they can accept or decline the connection. Overall, the solution is easy to connect to the user's system."

More ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"I would like the ability to remotely manage configuration and settings on individual units. Some organizations have a certain device configuration that needs to be consistent across all computers. For example, if we have computers that cannot go to sleep or hibernate because they're being accessed remotely, we need to be able to quickly configure those computers to not hibernate. With Datto, there is no easy and/or direct way to accomplish this. I can't create a group called No Hibernate and drag all those computers to that group so that they do not go into hibernation. There is no easy way to put in a policy or a procedure like that. It's still back to going to each computer and doing it by hand, which is what I'm trying to get away from. I want to automate and simplify as much as possible. I write code and scripts to do most of my work anyways. The intention is to get away from me having to be so hands-on.""We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers.""The only area where I see room for improvement is the ability to delay the application of patches for a set number of days.""The CRM capabilities are not very good. It's clunky and could work a lot better than it does. There are no marketing add-ins, for example.""They have a tab to provide information about the type of hardware the computers have. One thing they don't specify is what model of hard drive the computers have. Identification of storage models would be nice.""My most significant criticism is Datto is a complex product that takes a while to understand, but that could be said of almost any solution at the same level. It depends on where you're starting from. You have to rework all your workflows, and it's some heavy lifting if you want to get it right.""Sometimes we have some downtime when Datto is doing updates. Maybe it's because of the cloud service they use. I'm not sure if they're going through AWS or Azure or what. That's happened, but the outages have been few and far between.""The actual setup and the automation of their product are horrific. When you buy it, there is nothing out of the box. You have to custom design it for everything you want it to do. You pay for implementation, but they don't really do a whole lot to help you get it going. I know it does a lot more than what ours is set up to do, which is frustrating. When I've demoed other systems, their setup is so much better. When you pay for their setup, there is so much more, whereas I just feel like we didn't get a very good setup."

More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Cons →

"I have found ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP has many different network issues. Additionally, they need to incorporate more features, they are lacking add-ons.""Stability is sometimes negatively affected by updates.""Right now, ManageEngine is a separate solution. It doesn't integrate with Intune, AirWatch, or MobileIron in the cloud.""When there is a new user at a store, for example, you have to create it in the ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP AD but the process could be better. They call us with the user's information but if it was possible for them to populate the information when they log the user on IM, and when clicking on ADManager in the system, the information could populate there. We would then only have to add a little more information which would save time.""Although they say it is an enterprise solution, we don't have 24/seven human support. All we have is only 24/five support available from the vendor.""The partnership models and subscriptions can be improved, as regional master resellers sometimes hog the space.""Since this is an on-premise solution we had to update it a couple of times, and because we needed to use a command line to the server, it was not very easy, at least at that time to update the solution. The cloud version of this solution does not have this problem, but on the premise version, it was fairly cumbersome to apply to the Desktop Central server. This process could be made easier. This was the only issue I found with my colleague."

More ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AEM is a lot more scalable as you just pay per agent instead of having to purchase expensive licenses."
  • "We had to pay out some overtime for a few problematic sites. Sites on domain networks are incredibly easy to install. We learned a few tricks that streamlined the process, but in the beginning, it was a bit tedious."
  • "It goes by how many endpoints you have. It is about $3,000 a month for us. If we can't figure it out ourselves and need additional help to set it up, we would have to pay for that."
  • "The license typically depends on the number of endpoints. On the RMM side, I think we're paying around $2,250 per endpoint. Then there is also a license per user and tech, so that comes out to about a hundred bucks per tech, give or take."
  • "It fluctuates on the number of computers you have. Depending on the number of computers you have, it can fluctuate anywhere between $5 to $10 per computer per month, which is not too bad. I am not aware of any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee. It was one flat rate per device."
  • More Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This product has an easy setup, good support, and a good price."
  • "This product is very cheap compared to others."
  • "When we sold the solution to one customer, we found out the customer found out that one of their requirements was not being solved because the license only applies to five computers. We all thought at the time the current license that the customer bought covers the 600 computers because of this problem, the license model could be explained better and could be further improved."
  • "ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP is a less expensive solution than competitors in Latin America."
  • More ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Even when the connection to the server is lost, the monitoring continues without interruption.
    Top Answer:The only area where I see room for improvement is the ability to delay the application of patches for a set number of days. Currently, when patches become available, you have to either approve or… more »
    Top Answer:While the solution is a nice product, it may require some adjustments to be made in comparison to other products like N-central. However, Datto not only offers RMM software but also acts as a… more »
    Top Answer:While I cannot remember the exact cost, we chose the highest license level. We pay monthly per device. I'd rate it three out of five in terms of affordability. They are not the cheapest, however, with… more »
    Top Answer:There have been a few bugs. I would hope there would be a direct integration to the various cloud solutions, like Intune. Right now, ManageEngine is a separate solution. It doesn't integrate with… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,098
    Comparisons
    1,183
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    965
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Autotask EM, Autotask Endpoint Management, Datto RMM
    Desktop Central MSP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Autotask Endpoint Management is everything you need from an RMM solution, and it is all managed On Autotask’s customizable dashboards.

    Desktop Central MSP is an integrated Desktop and Mobile Device Management software that helps managed service providers to efficiently manage their customers' desktops, servers, laptops and mobile devices from a central point. It is suitable for small, medium as well as large MSPs.

    Sample Customers
    Wessex Networks, Base2, Valiant Technology, Technology Services Group, TechGuru
    South Jersey Techies, DCI, Lumen 21, Provendo, Saga, Gyver, AcroTec
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Construction Company7%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise40%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, TeamViewer and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is ranked 8th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 8 reviews while ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 7 reviews. Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Datto Remote Monitoring and Management writes "A solution that functions optimally even when the connection to the server is lost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] writes "Responsive support, a straightforward setup, and great endpoint management". Datto Remote Monitoring and Management is most compared with Atera, Microsoft Configuration Manager, PRTG Network Monitor, Kaseya VSA and NinjaOne, whereas ManageEngine Desktop Central MSP [EOL] is most compared with NinjaOne, LogMeIn Central, TeamViewer Remote Management and Kaseya VSA.

    See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

    We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.