We performed a comparison between D3 Security and Fortinet FortiSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)."The most valuable feature is the alert notifications, which are categorized by severity levels: informational, low, medium, and high."
"The SOAR playbooks are Sentinel's most valuable feature. It gives you a unified toolset for detecting, investigating, and responding to incidents. That's what clearly differentiates Sentinels from its competitors. It's cloud-native, offering end-to-end coverage with more than 120 connectors. All types of data logs can be poured into the system so analysis can happen. That end-to-end visibility gives it the advantage."
"The analytics has a lot of advantages because there are 300 default use cases for rules and we can modify them per our environment. We can create other rules as well. Analytics is a useful feature."
"Sentinel's most important feature is the ability to centralize all the logs in one place. There's no need to search multiple systems for information."
"I like the unified security console. You can close incidents using Sentinel in all other Microsoft Security portals, when it comes to incident response."
"The UI of Sentinel is very good and easy to use, even for beginners."
"Free ingestion for Azure logs (with E5 licence)"
"I like the KQL query. It simplifies getting data from the table and seeing the logs. All you need to know are the table names. It's quite easy to build use cases by using KQL."
"It is an out-of-the-box automated integration with our 20 departments. We perform L1 LiveOps automatically through the portal."
"It has a quick detection and response time."
"The solution is easy to implement and includes 450 built-in connectors."
"The reputation of the brand is very good."
"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSOAR is the playbook, which has to be defined to apply the policies."
"It is a scalable solution...The implementation phase of the product was not tough or difficult."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSOAR is the number of available connectors and the simplicity to start to automate."
"The troubleshooting has room for improvement."
"Currently, the watchlist feature is being utilized, and although there have been improvements, it is still not fully optimized."
"If I can use Sentinel offline at home and use it on a local network, it would be great. I'm not sure if I can use Sentinel offline versus the tools I have."
"For certain vendors, some of the data that Microsoft Sentinel captures is redacted due to privacy reasons."
"Add more out-of-the-box connectors with other SaaS platforms/applications."
"Sentinel should be improved with more connectors. At the moment, it only covers a few vendors. If I remember correctly, only 100 products are supported natively in Sentinel, although you can connect them with syslog. But Microsoft should increase the number of native connectors to get logs into Sentinel."
"When we pass KPIs to the governance department, there's no option to provide rights to the data or dashboard to colleagues. We can use Power BI for this, but it isn't easy or convenient. They should just come up with a way to provide limited role-based access to auditing personnel"
"They could use some kind of workbook. There is some limitation doing the editing and creating the workbook."
"Reporting needs improvement. MTTR and MTTD metrics aren't directly available in playbooks and require manual effort to achieve."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should add more documentation for some use cases."
"I have found that Fortinet FortiSOAR needs a lot of improvement. The Orchestration needs to be improved."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should improve its analysis."
"The technology and integrations are important so should continue to be enhanced."
"The UI design of the solution needs to be changed since it can get difficult for a newbie to operate."
"Fortinet's tech support overall is not great when they are at their best."
"The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."
"The solution doesn't connect well with the network devices."
D3 Security is ranked 20th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review while Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 11 reviews. D3 Security is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of D3 Security writes "Offers open API for integrating any available tools without any recurring costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "A stable solution that has a number of available connectors and is simple to automate". D3 Security is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR, whereas Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane, Cisco SecureX and Siemplify.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.