We compared CylancePROTECT and Trend Micro Deep Security based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: When comparing CylancePROTECT and Trend Micro Deep Security, CylancePROTECT is commended for its effortless implementation and precision, as well as its advanced AI-driven user behavior monitoring. However, it receives negative feedback regarding its cost, lack of user-friendliness, and excessive false positives. Conversely, Trend Micro Deep Security delivers supplementary capabilities like vulnerability protection and a firewall, receiving positive evaluations for its performance, customer support, and compatibility. Areas for improvement include reporting, handling dynamic threats, and affordability. Pricing differs for both solutions, and the customer support for Trend Micro is highly acclaimed.
"It is stable and scalable."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It does a good job of protecting us."
"The solution is pretty easy to scale."
"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."
"I find the actual overall endpoint malware protection the most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT."
"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating."
"Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push."
"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."
"The non-daily requirement to update signatures is the most valuable feature. From a functional point of view, it is pretty spot on. For instance, we compared an algorithm from five years ago to today's algorithm, and it was 98% accurate. It has the ability to detect and mitigate. In the industrial environment that we work in, there's what we call OT versus IT. You are IT Central, but this is OT. Generally, we don't have the same level of skillset as IT individuals or IT professionals have. This particular product doesn't require you to be a computer scientist to be able to understand its proprietary algorithm and to be able to deploy, use, and work within it. It integrates well with a robust SIEM or SOAR solution, and it plays nice with others. We use other detection solutions like CyberX or site provision with Cisco, and it plays nice. That's one of the things we really liked about it."
"In terms of valuable features, I would say its intrusion prevention. Each and every IP connecting to the server gets scanned so we know everyone who is accessing our server and we can block whichever IP's do not belong to us at the firewall."
"It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools."
"It provides the type of data and availability that we need to have. We don't have to worry about intrusions."
"Virtual patching is a wonderful feature where we do a recommendation scan and an internal assessment on the server, and it updates the IPS signatures to block any attack. I have seen instances where it has prevented attacks on the end-of-support servers such as 2018 R2, and many years ago, even 2007 servers that were end-of-support. It certainly helped there."
"Patch management is most valuable. The major selling point of Deep Security is that it is based on the cloud. Deep Security is for the servers and databases of data centers, and generally, for patch management, you have to shut down the machines, and then you have to restart them. So, they need shutdown time, which is a cost. Big enterprises don't want to shut down their database or their data center for any kind of patch. Deep Security creates a wall and downloads all patches. You install it on the cloud. So, it saves your server from any kind of intrusion or any kind of penetration, and whenever you get a chance or time, in six, eight, or nine months, you can physically download or install all those patches in one go. So, it saves you time. It also saves your shutdown time and keeps your data center safe."
"The agentless protection is very nice in Trend Micro."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"Very user-friendly interface, easy to understand."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."
"It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now."
"The user interface is outdated."
"The company that sells us the licenses sometimes doesn't know how to do certain things."
"It should have better support for Windows and Mac."
"The product does not do a lot of reporting on what it is taking care of. Enhanced reporting would be a welcome improvement."
"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."
"We want to see improved authentication."
"Their automation needs improvement."
"I think more work could be done on Deep Security's ability to handle dynamic threat scenarios."
"If I had more reporting, the product would be an A plus."
"Post-implementation is time-consuming. You have to do monitoring, and that takes time. After you set up everything, it's not a full-fledged implementation. You have to keep on monitoring and configuring."
"The support for email protection can be improved."
"The risk is very complex. We need our tools to be more intelligent, more automated, more detectable."
"Trend Micro Deep Security security and scalability could be improved."
CylancePROTECT is ranked 23rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 80 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Symantec Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.