"The console and tools are very user-friendly."
"Good file integrity monitoring features."
"It's easy to use and the interface is simple."
"Automated virtual patching is a good feature."
"The customer service/technical support for this solution is very fast."
"Patch management is most valuable. The major selling point of Deep Security is that it is based on the cloud. Deep Security is for the servers and databases of data centers, and generally, for patch management, you have to shut down the machines, and then you have to restart them. So, they need shutdown time, which is a cost. Big enterprises don't want to shut down their database or their data center for any kind of patch. Deep Security creates a wall and downloads all patches. You install it on the cloud. So, it saves your server from any kind of intrusion or any kind of penetration, and whenever you get a chance or time, in six, eight, or nine months, you can physically download or install all those patches in one go. So, it saves you time. It also saves your shutdown time and keeps your data center safe."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a firewall-based solution. We just open the required reports to the server—to server communication—and that's how we use Deep Security."
"This product offers good protection against many types of malware."
"The solution is quite secure."
"Could have better reporting capabilities and better support."
"The support is very bad. They're not fast at all. Trend Micro's support is much better."
"The setup is fairly complex. The deployment took around two months."
"The product isn't very user-friendly."
"Their support should be improved. We need support in the UAE, but it is always going to some other country or region, and the time schedule is not suitable for us."
"Requires simplification, a fair amount of trouble shooting required."
"It should have XDR and EDR integration. It would be nice if they can tie it up with an XDR or EDR."
"Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust."
"Another issue is if I want to suggest this solution to a customer, we won't get the pricing immediately, which is a major problem."
"Deep Security's reporting functionality could be improved."
Symantec Data Center Security is ranked 8th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 2 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Cloud and Data Center Security with 25 reviews. Symantec Data Center Security is rated 7.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Symantec Data Center Security writes "Great file integrity monitoring features; lacking in reporting capabilities and support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Scalable and secure with an easy initial setup". Symantec Data Center Security is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, VMware NSX, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, McAfee MOVE AntiVirus and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Carbon Black CB Defense and Trellix Endpoint Security. See our Symantec Data Center Security vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.
See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.