Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL] comparison

CyberArk and ThreatLocker are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews
  • 4,241 Views
  • 1,272 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 5, 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and ThreatLocker Elevation Control EOL compete in the endpoint security category by managing and controlling application privileges. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and robust application control features, while ThreatLocker Elevation Control EOL offers competitive cost benefits and ease of use.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is known for application control, credential theft protection, and detailed activity logging. ThreatLocker Elevation Control EOL enhances security by simplifying the creation of elevation policies and minimizing the risk of privilege misuse.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker Elevation Control EOL's deployment is straightforward and offers solid technical support. In contrast, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager requires more complex deployment but provides extensive documentation and training resources.

Pricing and ROI: ThreatLocker Elevation Control EOL offers competitive pricing for quicker ROI due to its simplicity and lower setup costs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager requires a higher initial investment but delivers greater long-term value through its comprehensive features, resulting in potentially higher ROI for enterprises seeking a scalable solution.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (5th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (3rd), Ransomware Protection (5th)
ThreatLocker Elevation Cont...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Sumit Chavan
Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
Read full review
Use ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL]?
Leave a review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise18
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 9% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 8% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 7% of the time
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 4% of the time
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
February 2026
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reportDownload CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
January 2026
ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL] reportDownload ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
No data available
 

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL] is a sophisticated security tool designed to manage application permissions effectively. It enhances control over user privileges, limiting the risk associated with unauthorized access to critical systems.

This tool is specifically crafted for IT environments seeking advanced privilege management. By offering detailed controls over application elevation, it significantly improves security posture without hindering productivity. Users find its granular permission settings and ease of integration particularly valuable, helping to seamlessly implement strict security protocols across enterprise networks. While it provides robust protection, some users have noted that initial configuration can be complex, indicating room for streamlining deployment processes.

What are the standout features of ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL]?
  • Granular Permission Control: Allows precise adjustment of application permissions.
  • Ease of Integration: Seamlessly fits into existing IT infrastructures.
  • Dynamic Rule Adjustment: Enables quick policy changes in response to new threats.
  • Comprehensive Audit Logs: Provides detailed activity tracking for security reviews.
What are the benefits or ROI to look for?
  • Improved Security: Reduces unauthorized access risks effectively.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines workflow by minimizing permission-related disruptions.
  • Cost Savings: Lowers potential breach-related expenses due to better access management.
  • Scalability: Adapts to changing organizational needs, supporting growth.

In industries such as healthcare and finance, ThreatLocker Elevation Control [EOL] is implemented as a key component of cyber defense strategies. Its control over user permissions helps ensure compliance with strict regulatory requirements, making it a trusted choice for safeguarding sensitive data and maintaining operational integrity.

ThreatLocker
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.