IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • CTERA Drive vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

CTERA Drive vs Microsoft Office SharePoint Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
  • "It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."

    • More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    619,967 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?
    Top Answer:Document management and records management features are the most valuable.
    Read all 20 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Office ...
    Top Answer:It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server?
    Top Answer:It is a bit restrictive to develop in the cloud version. A lot of features are in the cloud now, and you have to develop on the outside. As far as the platform and the programming side of things are… more »
    Read all 19 answers   →
    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 35 in Content Collaboration Platforms
    Views
    171
    Comparisons
    130
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 35 in Content Collaboration Platforms
    Views
    2,438
    Comparisons
    2,193
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    1,083
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
    Learn More
    CTERA
    Microsoft
    Overview

    CTERA Drive provides secure file access, collaboration, and data protection services for remote laptops, servers, and mobile devices – all managed from a single console. Users enjoy infinite local file capacity regardless of device storage restraints, with access to all cloud-based files from the desktop.

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

    Offer
    Learn more about CTERA Drive
    Learn More
    Learn more about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    J Walter Thompson Worldwide, Live Nation, McDonalds, WPP
    Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Media Company22%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    July 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: July 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    619,967 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CTERA Drive is ranked 23rd in Content Collaboration Platforms while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 10th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 4 reviews. CTERA Drive is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". CTERA Drive is most compared with Microsoft OneDrive, whereas Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, Google Drive Enterprise, HighQ and Atlassian Confluence.

    See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.