Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs WhatsUp Gold comparison

Broadcom and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Progress Software is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.5. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Progress Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

117 Views
117 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

WhatsUp Gold

Read 24 WhatsUp Gold reviews

2,642 Views
872 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

WhatsUp Gold

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

WhatsUp Gold and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management both compete in the IT management space. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management leads in features and user satisfaction despite higher pricing, while WhatsUp Gold is noted for ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

Features: WhatsUp Gold offers network monitoring, intuitive setup, and user-friendly dashboards. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides extensive application performance monitoring, detailed metrics, and scalability.

Room for Improvement: WhatsUp Gold could benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities and more third-party integrations. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management could improve usability and reduce complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhatsUp Gold has simple deployment and responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has a steeper learning curve and more complex deployment, but a robust support team.

Pricing and ROI: WhatsUp Gold’s lower setup costs and faster ROI make it budget-friendly. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management requires a higher initial investment, but its advanced capabilities lead to strong long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. WhatsUp Gold Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. WhatsUp Gold

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WhatsUp Gold

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (28th), Server Monitoring (16th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhatsUp Gold is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Tom Condo

Supervisor Information Services Operations at Seminole County Public Schools

If CPU, memory, or disk space is over-utilized, it alerts us immediately via text or email if there is an issue

When it comes to the intuitiveness of the topology mapping feature, our network architect created a vision diagram of our entire network and then created the links tied into the WhatsUp active monitoring to different spots on our topology map. It's one of the more critical functions we do here. We have the map displayed in different places in our room and help desk. We get alerted via emails but we can also see it visually. It does what it says it's going to do. We find this feature very helpful. The interactive mapping interface for scrolling, zooming, and drilling down on an element to learn about a network issue is good. When we see a network there will sometimes be a spot that has one link. You can go into a particular part of the topology map, scroll in, and see exactly which module it is. All the information is provided. This feature really helps. You can see the correlation between that link and what failed. This feature is very helpful. The interface is fairly intuitive. Some of our users used SolarWinds and Nagios, and WhatsUp is easy in comparison. Once you get set up, the look, feel, and configuration are good. Our network architect had never used it before but he was able to create the Visio and map. It was very simple. He has no problems with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"Our local support team provides excellent service."

"It handles the basics of monitoring."

"It is stable."

"Auto scanning is most valuable. It looks for rogue devices on your network."

"WhatsUp Gold is very easy to deploy."

"The documentation is very good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the visibility it offers of everything in the network and infrastructure."

"The installation and configuration process are easy."

More WhatsUp Gold pros

Cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"The initial setup of WhatsUp Gold is a medium range of difficulty levels. However, if it is your first time it could be difficult."

"Pricing is too high relative to how many devices we use. The price list is not linear to number of devices."

"I would like to see them do an enhancement to the application monitoring. A lot of other products do better application monitoring so they should do some improvements to the application monitoring."

"The licensing model could be improved. Right now, the levels are too far apart. This causes the solution to be more expensive than it needs to be."

"The tool should focus on increasing its market share, as it is the only area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The new release cadence needs to be improved. It takes a while for them to add new features and functionality. There should be a quicker turnaround with new versions."

"Integrations with other devices. I want to have a product that has full integration with my active directory so I can track user activity. I want to track my complete user activity, so I'm looking for a product to implement in the near future, which will have full integration with my network and active directory users. It became very difficult to track user activity."

"Adding on services increases the cost and on the version we have there is no option for ATM monitoring."

More WhatsUp Gold cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"The most valuable feature is the cost compared to other solutions."

"The price of WhatsUp Gold is good."

"The choice of version depends on the number of points, or devices, that you want to monitor, and this makes the product expensive."

"There are some subscription charges that are quite heavy. I need to pay for support every year and these charges can be quite expensive. Aside from the initial cost for the tool, you need to pay additionally for support."

"This is a well priced solution."

"It is per device, per year. The pricing is very clear. If you have a service agreement, you get all of your major upgrades and minor upgrades. It was under $10,000 to go all-in with all of the different add-ons for it."

"The tool's price is reasonable. WhatsUp Gold is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"The pricing can be on the expensive side when considering competing products."

More WhatsUp Gold pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

What do you like most about WhatsUp Gold?

The interactive mapping interface for scrolling, zooming, and drilling down on an element to learn about a network issue is good. When we see a network there will sometimes be a spot that has one l...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WhatsUp Gold?

Clients find the licensing calculator confusing, but we simplify this for them by collecting relevant information first. The licensing is based on devices, providing better cost-effectiveness than ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WhatsUp Gold?

Improvements are needed in integration, especially for WhatsApp call and messages. Our region heavily uses WhatsApp Messenger for communication, and integration with this platform would be benefici...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Grafana vs WhatsUp Gold

Compared 11% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs WhatsUp Gold

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs WhatsUp Gold

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs WhatsUp Gold

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs WhatsUp Gold

Compared 6% of the time

More WhatsUp Gold Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

WhatsUp Gold

July 2025

Download WhatsUp Gold product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Explore and manage your entire network infrastructure effortlessly with WhatsUp Gold's robust layer 2/3 discovery, creating a detailed interactive map from the edge to the cloud. Monitor devices, wireless controllers, servers, virtual machines, applications, and traffic flows across various environments. Real-time alerts ensure optimal performance, allowing you to meet or exceed SLAs. The platform offers customizable maps, dashboards, and alerts for easy network management. Quickly resolve issues with intuitive workflows, reducing Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR). WhatsUp Gold's integrated log management provides easy visibility and control of device log data, allowing monitoring, filtering, searching, and alerting on syslogs or Windows logs. Archive logs to comply with regulatory requirements and preserve historical data, all through a user-friendly interface. Streamline network monitoring and issue resolution with WhatsUp Gold, making network management efficient and hassle-free.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Artoni Trasporti, Austin Independent School District, Banca Marche, Burke County North Carolina, Cambridge University School of Clinical Medicine, Clayco, Community Integrated Care, Desca, Deutsche Bergbau, Flexi-Van, Gropper, Hamleys, Hammonds Furniture, Knowledge IT, Idras S.P.A., Sibeg, Swann Engineering, Trivium Lindenhof

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. WhatsUp Gold

July 2025

Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. WhatsUp Gold

Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. WhatsUp Gold and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. WhatsUp Gold report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.