ControlUp vs ITRS Geneos comparison

ControlUp and ITRS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ControlUp is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while ITRS is ranked #49 with an average rating of 5.0. ControlUp holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to ITRS’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ControlUp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

ControlUp

Read 12 ControlUp reviews

2,431 Views
1,288 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,056 Views
1,906 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ControlUp

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ITRS Geneos and ControlUp compete in the monitoring software category, each excelling in different areas. ITRS Geneos seems to have the upper hand in real-time financial monitoring due to its adaptability and comprehensive toolset for capital markets, while ControlUp shines with endpoint monitoring and integration capabilities.

Features: ITRS Geneos is notable for real-time monitoring and extreme customizability, essential for financial institutions managing transaction latencies. It offers comprehensive data capture and proactive alert generation, particularly in low-latency environments. The ability to ingest and customize scripts makes Geneos a versatile solution for enterprise needs. ControlUp is recognized for its endpoint monitoring capabilities and real-time insights using baseline analysis. It features extensive options for automated script actions, beneficial for network performance optimization, and is praised for superior data visualization and integration.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos needs to improve its historical data analysis and visualization tools, as users demand enhanced dashboards and easier navigation. Its flexibility causes a learning curve, and cloud monitoring capabilities are limited. Users call for better documentation and more intuitive setup options. ControlUp requires improvements in network infrastructure monitoring and reporting capabilities. Customers highlight the need for streamlined integration systems and a simplified interface to reduce clutter.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos focuses primarily on on-premises setups, which can be complex, but users praise its knowledgeable and responsive support teams. ControlUp benefits from easier hybrid cloud deployments, offering good customer service and technical support. Its deployment edge makes it appealing for enterprises favoring cloud-based ecosystems.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is considered expensive, though it delivers value through proactive incident management and standardized monitoring models. Despite high costs, users report that it enhances critical business processes and reduces incidents. ControlUp's competitive pricing is attractive, especially with special integrations for VMware solutions, though potential hidden costs exist in annual agreements. Overall, the pricing structure meets user expectations for infrastructure monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed ControlUp vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ControlUp vs. ITRS Geneos

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ControlUp

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

32nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (6th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

49th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (34th), Network Monitoring Software (69th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of ControlUp is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Richasvi Tripathi

Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies

Used to monitor several devices, but most reports do not give information of all the devices

We have approximately 10 to 20 feature requests pending on the vendor side. Most reports give information about the top 100 devices, but not all of the devices. In our case, we are monitoring 200000 devices. So, we need details for all those devices, but that is limited to 100, which they have improved to an extent in some reports. I'm thinking of one feature request for ISPs because the dashboard does not provide a detailed list of ISPs, and it provides the wrong list. I feel some firewall issues are blocking that, and the team cannot send that detail. That may be the case. One feature request pending on the vendor side is the data format change. Once you see a detail in the report, it is mentioned in some other format, which is hard to analyze sometimes.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integration with Netscaler and Scoutbees can provide a proper end-to-end analysis of the user's experience and give us a real ROI."

"When using ControlUp, the core feature that we have found valuable is its UI. It is a valuable tool to view the analysis reactions of a base core Level 2 or Level 1 team so that they can complete the necessary troubleshooting."

"ControlUp is beneficial as it provides a web interface through which you can access all your infrastructure—servers, devices, and VDI infrastructure—all on the same platform. It supports gathering all infrastructure components in a single, unified dashboard. This helps you identify performance issues or high resource utilization, allowing quick troubleshooting. I appreciate the solid interface that ControlUp offers."

"ControlUp has an easy installation process."

"Security, uptime, and reduced capital expenditures are the main reasons we use ControlUp. So basically, the money that we consume is based on the amount of time we are using a service."

"The visual look of the interface is very easy to understand what is happening and somewhat why it's happening."

"The most valuable feature is the granularity of visibility into the resources that are in use by our applications."

"The most valuable features in ControlUp are endpoint monitoring and the many features that are available."

More ControlUp pros

"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"The clean and colorful UI and easy to use options like snooze and active times."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"The biggest benefit of Geneos is the fact that we can clearly see, if we have an alert, where that alert has come from. We can see the data around that alert and anything that might be relevant is also shown. We can very easily right-click and see why we've received that alert. That's the best part about it, that you've got all the data there with the alerting."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"Integration is always a problem, and we feel that we are doing our best and the service provider thinks they are doing their best. I guess if ControlUp's system could be more capable or if people could understand the integration part, that would be better."

"We'd like to see the mobile app working again so that we can get alerts 24/7. This is especially useful for the person on call."

"It can be improved by including script-based scheduling."

"The graphical user interface needs to be improved from version to version."

"Something I would love to see from a partner perspective would be maybe a way to do this in a surface hosting provider."

"Solve is a quick and intuitive tool for quickly mapping data together, however, once you have the view of the data that you like, it is difficult to share this with colleagues."

"Most reports give information about the top 100 devices, but not all of the devices."

"There was some lag earlier, and reports pulled from the dashboard would sometimes be half an hour old. But now, the information provides real-time status, which is greatly appreciated. Overall, I've seen improvement in the product."

More ControlUp cons

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS. We have to send reporting to management every day. To do that we have to check the dashboard and then we have to report whether everything is fine or not. In the future, I want something, some reporting kind of feature in ITRS, where it can collect all the data and mention what is green, what is amber, what is red in a report."

"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."

"I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."

"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Based on my experience, ControlUp is not that expensive."

"Personally, I would say that the only thing I could compare it to is another monitoring tool that we use, Nagios."

"We are satisfied with the price compared to other solutions."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ControlUp Real-time?

Based on my experience, ControlUp is not that expensive. It is a cheap tool because it is deployed to many devices where I work.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ControlUp Real-time?

There is area for improvement, maybe in the reporting. It could use some work in reporting.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ControlUp Real-time?

My use cases include everything, and I don't mean that facetiously. I mean everything. We manage the servers, manage user sessions, manage everything. We monitor monitoring and take actual actions,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nexthink vs ControlUp

Compared 25% of the time

Citrix uberAgent Monitoring vs ControlUp

Compared 21% of the time

Zscaler Digital Experience (ZDX) vs ControlUp

Compared 8% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ControlUp

Compared 7% of the time

SysTrack vs ControlUp

Compared 7% of the time

More ControlUp Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 20% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ControlUp

August 2025

Download ControlUp product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

August 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Geneos

Overview

ControlUp is a digital experience monitoring management platform that makes it possible for IT teams to deliver a work-from-anywhere experience for employees. The solution makes fixing and preventing issues easy, enabling IT teams to make smarter decisions. It also provides monitoring performance, availability, and useful productivity metrics.

The ControlUp platform supports:

Any digital workstyle
Physical endpoints
Virtual desktops
Apps
SaaS
Web apps
Unified communications tools

ControlUp Features

ControlUp has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Out-of-the-box device and performance metrics
Custom metric and device data collection
Non-intrusive, secure agents with offline mode
Custom reporting
Easy-to-use dashboards
Scalable SaaS infrastructure
Built-in troubleshooting & remediation actions
Remote assist
Custom script actions
Multiple scripting languages
Automation and alerting

ControlUp Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing ControlUp. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Wide range of platform options: ControlUp offers multiple platform options including Windows, macOS, Linux, and IGE, independent of device location.

Powerful analytics: With ControlUp, you can analyze across your entire infrastructure or you can collect detailed individual device performance.

Optimizes performance: The solution enables you to remediate issues and optimize performance with its support of both manual and automated actions.

Minimize user downtime: ControlUp helps you catch common issues that lead to workflow interruptions. Self-correcting capabilities and comprehensive early-warning systems address issues before they impact employee productivity.

Resolve issues faster: The solution enables you to spend less time on support calls and more time driving value via its real-time troubleshooting and remediation solutions.

Increased visibility of remote environments: Gain real-time visibility across your entire network and find new ways to deliver the best end-user experience possible.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the ControlUp solution.

A Chair, IEEE Consumer Technology Society - Dallas,Texas, USA at a non-profit says, “In terms of the public cloud, ControlUp's features make us feel very secure. Security, uptime, and reduced capital expenditures are the main reasons we use ControlUp. So basically, the money that we consume is based on the amount of time we are using a service. ControlUp offers a return-on-investment type of approach that helps us.”

A VP Virtualisation and Citrix Engineer at BlackRock mentions, “Solve is quickly becoming one of the most-used features. Its interface allows us to connect to all 54,000 monitored endpoints in real-time. The script-based actions have allowed us to extend the core reporting capabilities. Combined with the triggers, we have been growing their usage to fix things before they become an issue. Lastly, the controller view allows us to compare the configurations of settings side-by-side which is extremely helpful when tracking down the RCA of an issue.”

A Senior Citrix Remote Access Engineer at Rabobank comments, “The high-level view of the estate coupled with powerful administration tools has been great. We can see real-time performance and trends and can create triggers for common issues with associated scripts that can automate a lot of the previous manual remediation steps.”

ControlUp

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

B/E Aerospace, North Carolina SECU, Vancouver Island Health Authority, University of Florida

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

ControlUp vs. ITRS Geneos

July 2025

Free Report: ControlUp vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about ControlUp vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ControlUp vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.