CloudSphere vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Why PeerSpot?

CloudSphere and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. CloudSphere is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. CloudSphere holds a 3.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudSphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

CloudSphere

Read 6 CloudSphere reviews

2,859 Views
772 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 360 HPE Zerto Software reviews

25,432 Views
2,543 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

CloudSphere

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

HPE Zerto Software and CloudSphere are competing products in the IT resilience and cloud management domains. HPE Zerto Software maintains the edge in disaster recovery solutions due to its seamless data protection, whereas CloudSphere shines in cloud management with extensive insights and efficiency. Still, CloudSphere’s comprehensive analytics make it a strong contender.

Features: HPE Zerto Software is notable for its continuous data protection, disaster recovery capabilities across virtual and physical environments, and its automation in processes, which reduces manual intervention. CloudSphere excels in asset discovery and management, offering insights into cloud costs, security compliance, and robust analytics capabilities for efficient cloud operations.

Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance its Hyper-V services, focus more on cloud-based analytics to reduce reliance on external analytics tools, and further automate orchestration for better user experience. CloudSphere may improve its initial service setup process, deliver more personalized support solutions, and enhance integration standards to align more closely with varied cloud ecosystems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software offers a straightforward deployment process with rapid installation and responsive customer service. CloudSphere provides flexible deployment with resources to handle complex environments efficiently, but it stands out for its customization capabilities in broader IT infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software requires substantial initial investment, but its high ROI through efficient data protection can offset costs. CloudSphere offers competitive pricing and scalable solutions, presenting clear ROI due to its comprehensive cloud management capabilities, which appeals to organizations seeking extensive cloud management with favorable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSphere vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Migration

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (29th)

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Migration

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

360

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Backup (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of CloudSphere is 3.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 4.5%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	4.5%
CloudSphere	3.0%
Other	92.5%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Asad-Ali

Dev Ops Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Cloud security assessments have improved cost control and vulnerability management across clients

The alerting system could be explored further, as it would help users integrate the alerting system more effectively. Additionally, an AI feature would be beneficial, as AI is prevalent nowadays and could integrate into environments to help customers. I would particularly like to see the AI feature added to CloudSphere so it automatically integrates into our environment and generates comprehensive reports, which would decrease workload from the engineer's perspective. If CloudSphere integrates AI and guides users on which security compliance they need to follow, AI could automatically scan everything and provide a report stating which areas need improvement and what points require attention.

Read full review

Aslah Faseel K

DevOps Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

"CloudSphere is very mature and very effective."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

"When I started using CloudSphere, it wasn't mature, and it had multiple issues. For example, my team experienced server issues while using the solution, but recently, I noticed how much CloudSphere has improved. There used to be some latency issues with CloudSphere. It even gave error messages in the past when you select an option such as "the web server is not responding", but it has improved a lot, and now I don't get any errors from CloudSphere. What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"To others, if a company is looking for a security vulnerability tool or governance and policy tools that help improve their environment, I would recommend CloudSphere because it is very helpful, easy to use, user interactive, and provides many functions and features."

"The scalability of the solution is a godsend."

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

More CloudSphere pros

"Once you set it up, it just works, providing continuous data protection with an intuitive, easy-to-use interface and low maintenance, set-and-forget operation for our mission-critical databases."

"The most valuable feature is Zerto's ability to precopy data to a remote destination prior to the actual live migration period. That saves us a lot of time and has been very helpful. For example, if we had migrations occurring in waves over a period of several weeks with a VPG or VPG setup of approximately 50 VMs, that is multiple gigabytes of data, even terabytes in many cases. Having that data already copied on the evening of the migration saves considerable hours of time. It easily saves us four to six hours a night."

"The features I appreciate the most about HPE Zerto Software are the automated failover and orchestration, and then the journal for point-in-time recovery."

"I really like how you can test the failover as often as you need."

"Zerto's ability to test failovers with a record of how long it takes to fail the motor is beneficial, as it allows us to know the timing in the event we have to do it live."

"The features I appreciate most about HPE Zerto Software include their journal replication, which is a faster replication technology than what else is available."

"A lot of that saved time has been allocated to value-add tasks; it's been great. We've been able to do other things."

"Live replication and up to the second type of failover are valuable. The fact that we can do test failovers and failbacks is important for our ISO certification."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

"The alerting system could be explored further, as it would help users integrate the alerting system more effectively."

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"Customer service is five out of ten. There is room for improvement. We need more local support."

"I have experienced issues with downtime, crashes, and performance with HPE Zerto Software. When we first deployed it, we were replicating to AVS, and we've done DR tests where we've left that test environment running for a significant period and had issues with the amount of storage space it was using."

"Whenever we do a failover, there's a confirmation box that shows up later. It's a little hard to see sometimes... A popup to continue would be a little bit better because then you're not sitting and waiting for something and it's already there."

"The long-term recovery is a little bit weak in its granularity."

"The syncing of the replication needs improvement. My experience has been that, every once in a while, when you go to do a failover, it tells you it's not syncing. Then you have to troubleshoot and figure out why it's not fully synced up."

"We would like some of the real fine or granular things. We've submitted a few minor things for enhancements such as being able to control bandwidth utilization for each facility you replicate to versus overall. We just need a little bit more granularity on some of the things, but there is not a whole bunch that is in need of tweaking."

"I would give technical support a nine out of ten. I'm taking away a point because, at times, they send emails for me to read when I need something done immediately."

"I would like to see some graphical improvements in Zerto's interface. There's an option to export a list of all of our servers, but the information isn't presented the way we want. We want it in a specified sequence broken down by region, etc. We can't manipulate the data when we export it. Maybe they could change it to look more like an Excel sheet, and we can customize the graphics and data. We suggested these improvements to Zerto through their portal."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

"The product is very expensive."

"The pricing is pretty competitive to that of other options out there. When we shopped around, it was in line with the price of other solutions."

"We find the Zerto pricing fits our budget."

"The pricing is based on virtual machines. They need to do better in regards to their tiering pricing rather than one price per VM. A lot of times we have VMs that are lower tier, such as Tier 2 or Tier 3, but we pay the same price as for Tier 1. I know they are developing this out, but it would be nice if they could provide a little better pricing in regards to their tiering protection."

"The pricing is straightforward."

"Nothing is cheap, but Zerto represents decent value."

"I would like to see different service levels. They're good, but it still takes a lot of our budget in ops."

"I know it is per server, but I am not fully aware of the price model. I know for our VDI environment, they are looking at something that is on the lower end and that they can use just for migrations and not so much a disaster recovery."

"They should adjust the pricing because I feel its price is too much. If they reduce the price, there will be more users and customers."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	94
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	207

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for CloudSphere?

My company relies on security assessments and vulnerabilities in our cloud environment in Azure, so we scan using CloudSphere. We work in MSP and Azure MSP with multiple clients, using two tools: P...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudSphere?

To others, if a company is looking for a security vulnerability tool or governance and policy tools that help improve their environment, I would recommend CloudSphere because it is very helpful, ea...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudSphere?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

HPE Zerto Software's GUI needs modernization to match the flexibility and user experience of other HPE software solutions, as there is still room for improvement in software-level flexibility and t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 7% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 6% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Tata Communications InstaCompute vs CloudSphere

Compared 2% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere

September 2026

Download CloudSphere product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

HyperCloud

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

CloudSphere

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. HPE Zerto Software

September 2026

Free Report: CloudSphere vs. HPE Zerto Software

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSphere vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudSphere vs. HPE Zerto Software report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.