CloudBees vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

CloudBees and OpenText are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. CloudBees is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. CloudBees holds a 2.5% mindshare in DSO, compared to OpenText’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

328 Views
1 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 21 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

749 Views
1 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

CloudBees

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and CloudBees both compete in the DevOps domain, with a focus on application security and continuous integration, respectively. CloudBees holds the upper hand with its comprehensive CI/CD solutions, despite OpenText's appealing pricing.

Features: OpenText is known for its effective vulnerability detection, comprehensive security assessments, and automation capabilities. CloudBees offers flexible CI/CD pipelines, rich integration options with various tools, and robust application delivery automation features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its user interface, documentation for complex setups, and integration with non-standard development environments. CloudBees might benefit from streamlining plugin version compatibility, enhancing log management, and offering clearer upgrade paths for instance and plugin synchronization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides quick deployment options and responsive customer support, aiding security initiatives. CloudBees excels in adaptability, offering seamless integration and strong customer service that accommodate varied enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers cost-efficient pricing, potentially leading to long-term savings. CloudBees requires a higher initial investment but justifies it with improved efficiency and faster time-to-market, resulting in a higher ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in DevSecOps

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (6th), Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd)

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 2.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 6.8%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudBees assists by automating tasks, previously done manually, in the pipeline setup."

"One recent product feature that stands out is the pipeline explorer, which is providing significant value for us right now."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its flexibility."

"CloudBees is the Jenkins tool for building and deploying. There's open-source Jenkins, which is free and can be used by any organization, but it offers a different architecture for Jenkins. If your organization is larger, you might choose the architecture. This way, you can have different masters for different applications, and different teams can manage their masters separately. However, a single person can still control all the masters, whoever manages it for the organization."

"The security audit product offered by CloudBees is particularly beneficial in automating audit processes, which reduces the time developers spend on audits."

"CloudBees's user interface is very simple and user-friendly."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

More CloudBees pros

"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."

"It is scalable and very easy to use."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."

"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."

"Fortify WebInspect is a scalable solution, it is good for a lot of applications."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

Cons

"I would like to see improved speed and availability."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

"It could improve the document upload process."

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. W"

"The user interface of CloudBees is good but could be even more intuitive. Improving the user-friendliness of the interface and having simpler setup configurations would greatly benefit new users."

"The setup is somewhat complicated. You need a cloud architect and engineer to set it up properly. The initial setup will take time, so you need a good engineer and architect to handle it."

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

More CloudBees cons

"We have had a problem with authentification."

"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."

"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

"It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application."

"The initial setup was complex."

"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."

"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This solution is very expensive."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"The price is okay."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Legal Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortify WebInspect?

The solution's technical support was very helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

The price of Fortify WebInspect is high, with the cost depending on the number of virtual users. It is approximately 25% higher than other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate. The cost of the license depends on the number of virtual users and, in comparison to...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 49% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 24% of the time

Tekton vs CloudBees

Compared 15% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 12% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 20% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 13% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

June 2025

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Overview

CloudBees DevOptics is a robust software utilized primarily to enhance CI/CD processes by offering real-time visibility into Jenkins pipelines. It facilitates effective monitoring, incident management, and decision-making through comprehensive data analysis. Users value its features like DevOps performance metrics and seamless tool integration, leading to improved operational efficiency and productivity in organizations.

CloudBees

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Aaron's

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.