CloudBees vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

CloudBees and OpenText are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. CloudBees is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. CloudBees holds a 2.9% mindshare in DSO, compared to OpenText’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

1,050 Views
294 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

3,107 Views
559 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

CloudBees

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 10, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and CloudBees compete in application security and DevOps automation, respectively. OpenText is preferred for its targeted security solutions, while CloudBees is favored for its extensive DevOps functionalities.

Features: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is known for its advanced vulnerability detection, automatic security updates, and integration with Fortify code scanner. CloudBees offers strong integration capabilities, continuous delivery pipelines, and a flexible CI/CD environment that automates end-to-end product life cycles.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve in ease of deployment and reducing the learning curve. CloudBees may enhance integration compatibility to avoid delays caused by version mismatches and could provide better plugin management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBees provides an easy deployment process and responsive customer service. In contrast, OpenText requires a more in-depth understanding for configuration, though it offers thorough security support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers cost-effective pricing for security-focused enterprises, aiming for high security ROI. CloudBees might involve a higher initial investment but provides long-term benefits with efficient software delivery, justifying the cost for enterprises focusing on optimizing DevOps workflows.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in DevSecOps

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (6th), Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 2.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 5.8%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudBees	2.9%
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	5.8%
Other	91.3%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security audit product offered by CloudBees is particularly beneficial in automating audit processes, which reduces the time developers spend on audits."

"CloudBees is the Jenkins tool for building and deploying. There's open-source Jenkins, which is free and can be used by any organization, but it offers a different architecture for Jenkins. If your organization is larger, you might choose the architecture. This way, you can have different masters for different applications, and different teams can manage their masters separately. However, a single person can still control all the masters, whoever manages it for the organization."

"CloudBees updates its features frequently, so if we need something like SSL login, they enable it."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

"I find the automation feature most valuable. CloudBees is highly scalable and supports both small and large teams. The deployment process is also faster when compared to on-premise."

"CloudBees operates seamlessly. Deploying to a cluster is straightforward—just one click, and the job is done."

More CloudBees pros

"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."

"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."

"The solution's technical support was very helpful."

"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."

"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."

"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

Cons

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"The setup is somewhat complicated. You need a cloud architect and engineer to set it up properly. The initial setup will take time, so you need a good engineer and architect to handle it."

"I think a preview of the errors would be good just at the point where the error occurs."

"There could be improvements in the ease of use."

"It could improve the document upload process."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

"We've noticed occasional issues with folder permissions changing unexpectedly. Specifically, permissions sometimes shift from the CloudBees user to the root user. This can cause pipeline failures, as pipelines require the correct CloudBees user permissions to execute properly."

"The user interface of CloudBees is good but could be even more intuitive. Improving the user-friendliness of the interface and having simpler setup configurations would greatly benefit new users."

More CloudBees cons

"There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan."

"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."

"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."

"We have often encountered scanning errors."

"The scanner could be better."

"It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application."

"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."

"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This solution is very expensive."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"The price is okay."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Legal Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 39% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 24% of the time

Jenkins vs CloudBees

Compared 20% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 17% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 18% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

October 2025

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Overview

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Aaron's

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.