CloudAware vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

The compared CloudAware and Zscaler solutions aren't in the same category. CloudAware is ranked #34 in CM , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.4% mindshare in the category. Zscaler is ranked #4 in SASE , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudAware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

CloudAware

Read 1 CloudAware review

416 Views
191 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 67 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

13,990 Views
6,156 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

CloudAware

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

CloudAware and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform compete in cloud security and management. Zscaler is often viewed as superior due to its comprehensive features that many believe justify its higher cost.

Features: CloudAware focuses on cloud management and compliance with integrations for Amazon, Microsoft, and Google cloud services. It automates enterprise IT workflows and provides comprehensive dashboards. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange emphasizes security with a zero-trust model that prevents unauthorized access and ensures secure connections. The main difference is CloudAware's broad management capabilities compared to Zscaler's focus on advanced security measures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudAware is known for straightforward deployment and effective customer service, especially during setup. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has a more complex deployment process due to its extensive security customization options. However, Zscaler's customer service effectively addresses setup complexities.

Pricing and ROI: CloudAware presents a more cost-effective setup and focuses on long-term ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange requires a higher initial investment but offers high returns through enhanced security measures over time, making it attractive for its long-term security ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudAware

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (34th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (27th)

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (9th), Application Control (6th), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (4th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. CloudAware is designed for Cloud Management and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), holds 9.5% mindshare, down 11.7% since last year.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudAware	0.4%
VMware Aria Automation	5.8%
Morpheus	4.4%
Other	89.4%

Cloud Management

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	9.5%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	11.8%
Cato SASE Cloud Platform	9.8%
Other	68.9%

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Featured Reviews

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Cloud cost visibility has improved and workload assessments now support stronger business cases

I am looking forward to more workload observability. The second thing is mostly looking forward to know cost optimization and how we can be able to manage multiple hyperscaler workloads from a single platform. I am looking forward to a monitoring solution that can monitor all hyperscaler services because AWS does have their 250 plus managed services offering. We have workload running in Kubernetes, Docker, EC2, RDS. I need a single platform that will monitor all these services which are being running in the cloud platform. Customer support is good. Whenever I have interacted with them, I got the required response from them. That is pretty much good. The organizations that are looking forward and have enterprise grade workload running in their public cloud platform, I would definitely recommend them to start using CloudAware because that is going to bring in value addition for them which they might not be aware of while using by themselves.

Read full review

Vibin Thomas

Team Lead, Technical Content Security at Valuepoint Systems

Zero trust access has transformed remote connectivity and now simplifies secure app usage

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, especially Zscaler Private Access, is very strong, though there are a few areas where improvements can be made. One challenge observed is around initial troubleshooting and visibility. While Zscaler Private Access provides logs, it can sometimes take time to pinpoint the exact cause of access issues, especially in complex environments with multiple policies and identity integration. Another area is the dependency on identity and connector health. Since Zscaler Private Access is heavily reliant on app connectors and identity providers, any issues with these components can impact user access, making proper monitoring critical. During the initial setup, policy configuration and application onboarding require careful planning, especially for larger environments with many applications. These challenges are manageable with proper design and monitoring. Overall, the platform delivers strong security and user experience. I would recommend a few improvements, especially around user interface, reporting, and troubleshooting experience. From a user interface perspective, while the platform is powerful, the policy configuration and navigation can feel complex, especially for new users. A more simplified and intuitive layout for policy mapping and application access would help reduce the learning curve. In terms of reporting, Zscaler Private Access provides logs, but having more built-in customizable dashboards and analytics would be very helpful. Better visibility into user access patterns, application performance, and real-time troubleshooting insights would improve operational efficiency. From a support and troubleshooting standpoint, it would be beneficial to have more granular centralized visibility, allowing for quick end-to-end tracing of a user request from authentication to application access without switching between multiple views. These improvements would make the platform even more efficient, especially for large-scale enterprise environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I utilized it in one of the use cases for workload assessment and definitely it has brought in the value as a return of investment to us, because that was the assessment I was doing for one of our end customers."

"The most valuable feature is the manageability of the micro tunnels."

"Before Zscaler, we used to use a lot of other products, however, when we were introduced to Zscaler we became confident it could meet the use cases."

"What I find most valuable in Zscaler Private Access is that it's a VPN. Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature."

"The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."

"The scalability of the solution is great."

"The in-line DLP feature is one of the most vital features"

"The most valuable features of Zscaler SASE include web filtering, application control, and the private access configuration."

"I like its ease of use. It has a single pane of glass for the ZIA and ZPA pieces. It is very manageable. It is also very easy to deploy for secure access, and it gives half-decent coverage for visibility in terms of what the users use and what data is being proxied through the access gateway."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"I am looking forward for a positive contribution because as per the research I did so far, it is going to benefit us if we start utilizing it, but I am a little concerned of whether it will fit in all our requirements."

"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."

"It has massive room for improvement. The Zscaler product itself is okay, but it doesn't give enough granularity for us as an organization to stipulate rules or processes, especially for data-driven services. For instance, we can stick on SSL inspection, but it's just a click box. It doesn't allow us to go any further into the detail of the SSL inspection. We also can't pull it out without having an additional logging server. It just doesn't give us enough granularity. They should give us more control over the interfaces because it is all backend. They weren't very open to discussing their backend architecture with us in terms of their own data centers. They can maybe a little bit more open about what components are there and how the backend infrastructure works alongside Zscaler. Its licensing can be better. Some of the additional licensing costs are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Their support should also be improved. I initially had a consultant from Zscaler for its deployment, but the support that I had throughout the deployment of the project wasn't the best."

"The pre-defined dictionaries could be improved."

"What could be improved in Zscaler Private Access is its notification. For example, if there's a speed issue, there should be a pop-up that alerts the user about it. If there is a network quality issue, for example, it isn't good enough to connect to, or the network quality is bad, there should be a notification from the solution. Zscaler Private Access also needs improvement in terms of its interface and security."

"Those folks will likely have some issues."

"They should work on a replica account. There could be alerts and replica files sent to the DLP team during data collection."

"The DX layer could be better if it had improved visibility."

"It has a limitation, if you are creating a rule or something for a web application or something, you could only add five users, not more than that. Five or four users are only included in a rule. If you want to create a rule for more than five or four users, you have to go through other methods, not particularly with the application. Working within the application with this method would be quite easy as compared to listing a URL or a normal IP address."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Zscaler SASE software is quite expensive compared to other solutions"

"Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"It's an affordable solution"

"The product is a little more expensive than other tools."

"It's expensive currently. But when purchasing for a large number of users, there's room to negotiate. It's really up to the procurement team."

"It is an auto-renewal subscription service."

"In the long run, cloud services are not inherently costly."

"The product is a bit expensive."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudAware?

That is pretty much good. I found it quite reasonable from the cost perspective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudAware?

I am not exactly using CloudAware. I am looking forward to know about what CloudAware is doing. I need some cost optimization solution for a workload running in AWS. I want better dashboards and al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudAware?

We have almost 1 million of ARR workload running in AWS which includes 100 to 200 virtual machines as EC2 and RDS. We are struggling to map what exactly the cost optimization strategy we need to fo...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler SASE?

The solution needs to improve a lot of aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs CloudAware

Compared 25% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CloudAware

Compared 24% of the time

AWS Control Tower vs CloudAware

Compared 19% of the time

Snyk vs CloudAware

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs CloudAware

Compared 15% of the time

More CloudAware Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download CloudAware product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

March 2026

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

CloudAware offers robust cloud management solutions, enabling efficient infrastructure monitoring, cost optimization, and compliance adherence across various platforms. Users appreciate its CMDB for resource tracking, automated security protocols, and enhanced cost management features, which collectively enhance operational efficiency and foster better team collaboration.

CloudAware

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

VPN-less Connectivity: Enables secure remote access without traditional VPNs.
Cloud-based Security: Offers scalable protection utilizing cloud infrastructure.
Single Sign-On: Integrates with multiple identity providers for streamlined access.
Dynamic URL Categorization: Provides real-time URL filtering to enhance security.
Advanced Threat Protection: Detects and mitigates sophisticated threats effectively.
Customizable Policies: Allows tailored security protocols to fit unique requirements.
Comprehensive DLP: Protects sensitive data through robust data loss prevention.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with cloud services and applications.

What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

Enhanced Security: Delivers consistent protection regardless of user location.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to data protection regulations.
Streamlined Access: Simplifies connectivity to private and cloud applications.
Scalability: Supports expanding organizational demands with cloud scalability.
Real-time Visibility: Provides instant insights into security incidents and network traffic.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

Sony, AOL, Thomson Reuters, Pearson

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.