Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs TeamViewer Pilot [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Citrix and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Access category. Additionally, 93% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

Citrix DaaS and TeamViewer Pilot both operate in the remote access and support sector. TeamViewer Pilot is perceived as having an edge due to its innovative augmented reality features, while Citrix DaaS is favored for its reliable enterprise integration.

Features: Citrix DaaS provides scalable virtual desktops, comprehensive application delivery, and seamless integration with enterprise IT infrastructure. It supports complex environments thoroughly. TeamViewer Pilot offers augmented reality features for remote visual assistance, effective troubleshooting, and solutions more suited for interactive support, focusing primarily on real-time remote guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix DaaS requires a more detailed setup process and significant initial IT involvement, optimizing support within structured enterprise environments. In contrast, TeamViewer Pilot is straightforward and offers quick setup, prioritizing ease of use and immediate operational capability, catering to quicker standalone deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix DaaS often entails higher initial costs associated with comprehensive IT infrastructure integration, but it promises substantial long-term ROI for enterprises seeking enterprise-grade solutions. TeamViewer Pilot, with typically lower initial costs due to its specific focus on remote support, offers a faster ROI for companies oriented towards solving immediate problems without extensive infrastructure investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Remote Access Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

Sorin Neacsu

Technical Lead on Virtual Desktop at Orange

Has delivered consistent desktop experiences across remote locations and has supported multimedia workloads efficiently

I have utilized the HDX protocol for compression and audio-video capabilities. When users need to conduct meetings with customers or colleagues, they can use Teams solutions and open a bridge where video and audio are encapsulated within the ICA protocol, which is protected by SSL and certificates for security. This provides secure communication at good quality through the HDX protocol. HDX protocol has improved application performance as it is specifically designed for multimedia applications. If processing audio or video files, such as in telecom where discussions are recorded and then prepared as video or audio, this does not consume excessive bandwidth during the operation compared to a normal remote desktop connection provided by Microsoft. Everything is compressed and provides sufficient bandwidth for multiple people to perform similar tasks without interruption or session disconnection. All multimedia-related activities, such as playing content on YouTube, deliver a better experience with this protocol overall. I use multi-factor authentication for opening sessions to the data center where users access their machines or software. Multi-factor authentication has helped secure applications because users typically have two-way authentication software on their phones. They use a password first and then authenticate themselves through their mobile application to grant access to resources. This approach is effective because if a hacker attacks a user, they need more than just the password and username. They must also possess the device that provides authentication. The device typically has facial recognition, a password, and provides better security overall.

Read full review

UdaySiddu

Software Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Good tech support

The location markings can appear incorrectly. If the customer shows his location on camera, on our machinery, but then moves it to another location and, subsequently, back to the original one, the location markings will appear incorrectly. We are talking about the augmented reality features. While I recommend the solution, the customer may face difficulties with screen sharing, such as occurs with our customers when it comes to working in an infrastructured area like a factory. We regularly get confused, as we also provide remote technical support. The initial setup is complex.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user experience is good; we could work and deploy many controls through Microsoft Intune."

"The most reliable feature is the integration with Microsoft XDR, which grants administrators and solution architects like me the ability to bring value to a business."

"Regarding Advanced Endpoint Analytics connected with Microsoft Intune, it is absolutely important to me because you just grab value; it is the way you take real value from your data."

"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."

"The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."

"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."

"It is a cloud solution, and you can easily scale as your needs grow."

"It works pretty well for us."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"It has improved delivering applications to remote locations with its lower bandwidth utilization, giving better performance to the user even with the lowest bandwidth."

"It is a good product. I don't have any complaints."

"You can try XenDesktop as an alternative to VMware View, and the Express edition allows you to use up to 10 machines or users."

"The user experience when using the solution's technology remotely is definitely superior to our VPN and/or Windows Remote Desktop. It's a much better user experience for those folks."

"First of all, the manageability of the applications for publishing is valuable. Second, it is about being able to run the applications on all main platforms. Third, its licensing is valuable. You can either switch to the cloud and keep on-prem. You can work with this hybrid scenario."

"Citrix Virtual Apps is the most valuable feature. Many customers use this feature to publish only applications, and not the full desktop. They can publish the internal resource or allow the end-user to reach a site or an application without having the full desktop. That's why they love this feature. It helps them save on resources."

"If you're a medium-scale or a small-scale business, it works great."

"It provides the flexibility of being used on any device which makes the employee experience better, in terms of ease of use."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do a virtual reality kind of presentation where you're able to annotate scenes to illustrate what you mean when you're talking to a customer."

"Technical support has good responsiveness."

"Technical support has good responsiveness, although they have recently made modifications to their licensing model."

"It's easy enough to use."

Cons

"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."

"Setting up Intune Autopilot can be a little complicated."

"Every day, we see a new feature that we want to apply, but what will be great for Intune is to be able to deploy apps in a simple fashion."

"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."

"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."

"This limitation in Microsoft Intune is a significant drawback; we cannot produce overall reports on an organizational level."

"I rate Microsoft customer service six out of 10. While some technicians go above and beyond, there is inconsistency, and connecting with the most helpful representatives is occasionally challenging."

"I am not involved in the day-to-day with Intune, but we have gone with a different product for updating mobile device software. We do not integrate many of our mobile devices that are not Microsoft-based devices, such as Dell laptops, with Intune."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"This solution is resource-intensive, it takes a lot of Bandwidth and a lot of the resources of the server."

"The video conferencing feature needs to be improved."

"I think improvement around the Analytics piece is super important. There has been a lot of maturity over the last year in that area, though a lot more needs to be done. Also, a lot more of the value of those Analytics needs to be sold to end users. Citrix is working on a lot of things that are ahead of the curve and a lot of organizations aren't quite there yet with implementing those technologies and capabilities."

"At the moment, if you want better monitoring, you need to buy a third license."

"The solution's technical support is not so good."

"In terms of support they are lagging. They take a lot of time to respond."

"We would like to be able to provide VDI, a full desktop, to each of our users."

"I have noticed that the current compatibility issue with the latest version of Windows 11 is a concern for me and my client. While the client has support for Windows 11, it appears that the Citrix Workspace is only compatible with Windows 10, which does not support the newest version. This is an area that I believe could be improved upon."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) cons

"It's quite power-hungry and some customers complain that it drains the batteries on their smartphones very quickly."

"The location markings can appear incorrectly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For organizations that are a Microsoft shop, the pricing is compelling."

"We spend a lot of money on Intune licensing, and some of our users have to be double licensed just because of how our dev and corporate environments are segmented."

"Pricing can be improved."

"Microsoft Intune is more expensive than other solutions, but it offers a wider range of features and control."

"I recently got to know that the AD P1 license is compulsory to use Intune Autopilot, which was surprising for me. Earlier, this was not the case. It is the wrong thing to do. We now need to purchase AD P1 licenses for us and for our customers. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing."

"The price could be better."

"Microsoft Intune's pricing is reasonable."

"It's affordable. It's cheaper if you have an Office 365, E5, or E3 subscription because everything is there."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the tool's price a three."

"The solution is affordable."

"I don't quite remember the specifics of what we had. I believe we had a 25-user license, and I don't recall it being overly expensive."

"It is quite expensive, but so are the competitors on the market."

"I suggest using the concurrent user licensing scheme."

"Citrix solutions cost a lot in comparison with competitors, like Azure Virtual Desktop or VMware Horizon. Those solutions cost around 50 to 60 percent less, per month per user, than Citrix."

"Based not only on the cost of Citrix, but additional costs like firewalls, IPS, and other solutions, the total cost of switching users from using normal laptops with VPNs to connection via Citrix were so huge that the CEO of our company decided to postpone the deployment process."

"You can buy an on-cloud or on-prem license. You can switch between on-cloud users and on-prem users. Its licensing is cheap. It is from $8 to $15 per user. It is not that expensive when you compare the cost of buying new hardware with the cost of the license. For example, at $15 per user, it costs around $180 for a year, which is cheaper than buying a $600 PC that at a certain stage, you will again have to change because its hardware is not supported. It may also get damaged or stolen. So, you can compare the cost of the actual hardware that you have to buy and the time spent in supporting the clients with the cost of its license."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pricing and cost advice

"It is not an expensive product."

"We pay for the licensing monthly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	195
Midsize Enterprise	64
Large Enterprise	190

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	69

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Workspace?

Citrix DaaS is considered expensive, especially for companies that do not require multi-cloud. Tiered pricing based o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Citrix Workspace?

The pricing of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) since the company was taken over by th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Citrix Workspace?

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is typically used by mobile workers and remote employ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 13% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Azure Virtual Desktop vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 4% of the time

Horizon Cloud Service vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 4% of the time

Horizon 8 vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 4% of the time

Rocket Exceed TurboX vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 3% of the time

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Competitors

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer Pilot [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

N-able Take Control vs TeamViewer Pilot [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

TeamViewer vs TeamViewer Pilot [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

ScreenConnect vs TeamViewer Pilot [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs TeamViewer Pilot [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More TeamViewer Pilot [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

October 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

October 2026

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) report

Download Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

October 2026

Download TeamViewer Pilot [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

XenDesktop, XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps), Citrix Workspace

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Citrix

Demo not available

TeamViewer

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Citrix DaaS provides centralized administration, high security, and app and desktop flexibility, offering excellent user experience and robust remote access. It is known for low bandwidth seamless performance and ease of use, ensuring consistent experience on diverse devices.

Citrix DaaS is a comprehensive service for virtual application delivery and remote access, ideal for distributed teams and mobile workers. Its support for application virtualization, data regulation compliance, and business continuity makes it valuable in remote work environments. Organizations use it for centralized management and secure remote workflows, benefiting from low-bandwidth delivery in multi-city deployments. However, enhancements in speed, performance, and scalability are necessary, along with better monitoring and pricing improvements. Users face cloud compatibility challenges, and improvements in virtual desktop functionality and multimedia experience are desired.

What are the key features of Citrix DaaS?

Centralized Administration: Streamlined management of virtual desktops and apps from a single console.
High Security: Advanced protection features for data and applications.
Flexibility: Customizable publishing options for apps and desktops.
Robust Remote Access: Reliable performance even on low bandwidth connections.
Device Support: Broad compatibility ensures seamless deployment across devices.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Business Continuity: Ensures consistent access to apps and data remotely.
Low Bandwidth Efficiency: Maintains performance in limited connectivity scenarios.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over remote resources.
Remote Work Enablement: Facilitates secure access for distributed teams.

In healthcare, Citrix DaaS supports secure access to patient records and applications essential for telemedicine. Financial services benefit from compliance with data regulation and secure workflows. In education, virtual desktops offer accessible learning resources, aiding remote teaching initiatives. Retail uses it for streamlining operations across dispersed locations, ensuring quick access to inventory systems and data management.

Citrix

TeamViewer Pilot [EOL] offered augmented reality technology to support remote assistance across multiple industries. Designed to connect people needing help with experts who provide guidance visually via smart devices.

TeamViewer Pilot [EOL] facilitated remote troubleshooting and maintenance by allowing technicians to view and interact with a user's environment through their smartphone or tablet camera. Leveraging AR, it enabled experts to annotate live video feeds, making problem-solving more efficient. Ideal for fields requiring hands-on advice and complex maintenance challenges, it bridged communication gaps between locations, enhancing efficiency and support quality.

What were the most valuable features?

Augmented Reality Guidance: Provided real-time visual assistance through live video and AR annotations.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Supported use on multiple devices and operating systems for wide accessibility.
Secure Data Transmission: Ensured that communications were encrypted for secure interactions.
Scalable for Teams: Designed to be easily integrated into workflows, accommodating team sizes and structures.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Efficiency: Reduced downtime through fast and effective problem resolution.
Cost Savings: Minimized the need for on-site visits, leading to reduced travel expenses.
Enhanced Collaboration: Fostered better teamwork with clear and direct visual communication.
Customer Satisfaction: Led to higher satisfaction with quicker service response times.

TeamViewer Pilot [EOL] found applications in industries like manufacturing, where it helped maintenance teams troubleshoot machinery. In technical support, customer service teams used it to resolve issues needing expert visuals. Healthcare professionals leveraged it for remote diagnostics and consultations, enhancing patient care and operational efficiency.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Exelon, Aeronamic, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Alameda County Medical Center, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Aloysius Stichting, Amarchand Mangaldas, AmBev, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arval

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Apache and others in Remote Access. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.