Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs Veracode comparison

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Read 208 Veracode reviews

27,682 Views
7,197 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Veracode and Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis are prominent players in the application security space. Veracode appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and flexible integration capabilities.

Features: Veracode provides robust cloud-based scalability, thorough vulnerability detection, and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous feedback for developers. It also offers superior source composition analysis and comprehensive live customer support. Checkmarx excels at ensuring the security of open-source components, offering detailed insights into library vulnerabilities and integrating seamlessly with development environments to provide user-friendly guidance on vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Veracode users face challenges such as high false positives, costly pricing, an outdated user interface, limited language support, and cumbersome report generation. Response times and scanning inefficiencies are additional concerns. Checkmarx users experience a confusing licensing model and share concerns about high false positives and pricing. Both solutions could enhance dynamic analysis and user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode's support for a wide range of deployment models, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, makes it versatile for various businesses. Customer support receives mixed reviews, with responsiveness being an issue for some. Checkmarx supports public and private clouds but lacks the deployment flexibility of Veracode. Users are generally satisfied with the training and support, despite occasional delays in responses.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode is pricey, with varying costs based on scale and features, which can be a barrier for smaller businesses. However, it offers ROI through risk management and reduced testing costs. Checkmarx is increasingly expensive compared to competitors but provides strong ROI by reducing open-source vulnerability risks and improving development efficiency. Both products face scrutiny over licensing complexities and costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Veracode Report (Updated: June 2026).

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs. Veracode

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veracode

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Container Security (12th), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is 2.5%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 6.0%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	6.0%
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis	2.5%
Other	91.5%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Tharindu Malwenna

Senior Application Security Engineer at a newspaper with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient library identification and upgrade suggestions improve application security

We have many third-party libraries in our organization. I used Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis to identify all the libraries we use and determine whether they are used or unused within the application Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis provides identification of libraries and…

Read full review

reviewer2753535

DevSecOps Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Integrates security into the development process and improves team collaboration

Veracode helps organizations develop software by reducing the risk of security vulnerabilities through developer enablement and applications focused on governance. You can utilize different levels of processes to achieve better performance or a more scalable service. Since I started working with it in 2022, I’ve found it to be cost-effective as well. Overall, Veracode is a user-friendly security tool. It includes features such as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA). During the development phase, we can identify vulnerabilities in the application. This process occurs in the staging environment during development. When we're ready to go to production, we conduct a final check. Essentially, this tool helps identify vulnerabilities during the code development stage, including both high-level vulnerabilities and those related to open-source software composition. We utilize specific methodologies for this purpose. Additionally, it offers a feature that allows us to set up policies based on client requirements. This means we can customize the tool to meet the specific needs of our clients, ensuring that they receive the appropriate level of security in their applications. Veracode is user-friendly as well. Compared to other tools, their scans take 15 minutes or under. If you have a large scale of libraries or data, it might take longer, but based on my personal experience, the scan usually runs within fifteen minutes. For my case study using the Veracode tool, I worked on an internal project following industry standards. We used Veracode to improve our security posture and speed up the time to market by streamlining the development process. This enhanced collaboration between developers, operations, and security teams. The automated scanning process helped identify and fix vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. We maintained compliance with regulatory requirements, avoided fines, and built customer trust by integrating security into the development process. When we conduct this scan, we receive data on a list of vulnerabilities. This information improved our communication and increased transparency, which leads to better reports about the efforts being put in. This results in a more effective and efficient collaboration process, making it user-friendly for all involved. When considering costs, if we resort to manual processes, it can be time-consuming. Therefore, we utilize automated scans to identify and fix security issues. This allows us to address vulnerabilities early in the development process, as we discussed previously. This applies both to our in-house code and third-party libraries, using Software Composition Analysis (SCA) agent-based scans. In the future, we will also implement SCA agent-based scans as a separate feature within Veracode, which can help organizations avoid the expensive and time-consuming consequences of security issues. Furthermore, we have seen an increase in compliance, helping to maintain adherence to regulatory requirements and industry standards, thereby avoiding fines and reputational damage associated with noncompliance. Additionally, by integrating security into the development process, we enhance customer trust in our organization and its products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is the comprehensive security scan."

"The integration part is easy...It's a stable solution right now."

"One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The customer service and support were good."

"I appreciate the user-friendly interface. The GUI is excellent, providing detailed information on outdated versions, including version numbers and the flow of library calls. This allows me to plan and prioritize library changes based on potential vulnerabilities, even if the affected library is indirectly used in my project. The tool offers specific guidance on addressing these issues."

"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist."

"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is that it provides security from the start. In the traditional approach, an enterprise or company validates the solution before launching to a production environment, but in the modern approach, security must be checked and provided from the beginning and from the design, and this is where Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis comes in. The solution helps you make sure that every open-source application that you use is secure, and that there's no vulnerability inside that open-source application."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis pros

"It is a good product for creating secure software. The static code analysis is pretty good and useful."

"This static analysis helps ensure a secure application rollout across all environments."

"My experience with Veracode across the board every time, in all products, the technology, the product, the service, and the salespeople are fabulous."

"Veracode helped with policy compliance."

"We have found the static analysis to be useful in Veracode Static Analysis. However, we are in the process of testing."

"They have provided AppSec best practices and guidance to our security and development teams through our support agreement, weekly meetings, and annual review."

"It is a cloud-based platform, so every organization or every security team in the organization is concerned about uploading their code because ultimately the code is intellectual property. The most useful thing about Veracode is that if you want to upload the code, they accept only byte code. They do not accept the plain source code as an input. The code is converted into binary code, and it is uploaded to Veracode. So, it is quite secure. It also has the automation feature where you can integrate security during the initial stages of your software development life cycle. It is pretty much easy with Veracode. Veracode provides integration with multiple tools and platforms, such as Visual Studio, Java, and Eclipse. Developers can integrate with those tools by using Jenkins. The security consultation or the support that they provide is also really good. Its user management is also good. You can restrict the users for a particular application so that only certain developers will be able to see the code that has been scanned. Their reporting model is really good. For each customer, they provide a program manager. Every quarter, they have their reviews about how much it has scanned. They also ensure that the tool has been used efficiently."

"When we do have errors, Veracode is always available, their consultants, to help us either mitigate the error, or provide technical assistance on pointing exactly where the problem is and how we could probably fix it. I'm always amazed at how knowledgeable they are."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"Some of the recommendations provided by the product are generic. Even if the recommendations provided by the product are of low level, the appropriate ones can help users deal with vulnerabilities."

"I have received complaints from my customers that the pricing could be improved."

"Instant updates for end users to identify vulnerabilities as soon as possible will make Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis better. The UI of the solution could also be improved."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced."

"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten."

"In terms of areas for improvement, what could be improved in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is pricing because customers always compare the pricing among secure DevOps solutions in the market. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has a lot of competitors yet its features aren't much different. Pricing is the first thing customers consider, and from a partner perspective, if you can offer affordable pricing to your customers, it's more likely you'll have a winning deal. The performance of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis also needs improvement because sometimes, it's slow, and in particular, scanning could take several hours."

"An area for improvement in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is for the updates to be fast."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis cons

"Because our application is large, it takes a long time to upload and scan."

"Their platform is not consistent. It needs a lot of user experience updates. It's slow performing, and they log you out of the system every 15 minutes, so using the platform is challenging from a developer's perspective because you always have to log in."

"I found that there were far too many warnings and some false positives."

"There are times when certain modules cannot be scanned automatically, requiring us to manually select these modules and initiate the scanning process on our side."

"It's taking too much time to do a quality scan."

"It needs better APIs, reporting that I can easily query through the APIs and, preferably, a license model that I can predict."

"There might be room for improvement in the in-app guidance and the tips and tricks for the developer about how to progress. We would like more insight into the development environment, where they would get guidance on how to avoid flaws."

"Straightforward to set up, but the configuration of the rules engine is difficult and complicated."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license model is somewhat perplexing as it comprises multiple aspects that can be confusing for customers. The model is determined by the number of registered users and the number of projects being scanned, along with a third component that adds to the complexity."

"We don't have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage."

"It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive."

"My customers need to pay for the licensing part, and they need to opt for an annual subscription."

"Pricing for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis needs to be competitive."

"I know that Veracode is a semi-pricey solution. If you are serious about security, I would recommend that you use an open-source option to learn how the scanning process works and then look into Veracode if you want to really step up your game and have an all-in-one solution."

"Veracode provides value for the cost, with no additional charges apart from the standard licensing fee."

"Pricing seems fair for what is offered, and licensing has been no problem. All developers are able to get the access they need."

"Licensing is pretty flexible. It's a little bit weird, it's by the size of the binary, which is a strange way to license a product. So far they've been pretty flexible about it."

"Veracode's price is reasonable."

"Veracode is costly. They have different license models for different customers. What we had was based on the amount of code that has been analyzed. The license that we had was capped to a certain amount, for example, 5 Gig. There would be an extra charge for anything above 5 Gig."

"We're very comfortable with their model. We think they're a good value. We worked very closely with Veracode on understanding their license model, understanding what comprises the fee and what does not. With their assistance in design, we decomposed our application in a way where we are scanning a very significant amount of code without wasting their capacity and generating redundant reported issues. You scan in profiles, per se. And we work with them, in their offices, to design the most effective approach. So the advice I would have for customers is, you can get up and live fast, but work closely with Veracode to refine the method you use for scanning and the way you compile the applications. There's a concept called entry-point scanning, and that's probably not used well by the rest of their customers. We see our licensing as a good value because we leverage it heavily."

"Without getting too specific, I'd say the average yearly cost is around $50,000. The costs include licensing and maintenance support."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Pricing is complex and high for small organizations but offers great benefits for larger organizations. It is notably different compared to competitors like GitHub Advanced Security.

What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

The solution could improve by determining the success factor of an upgrade, which is currently lacking.

What is your primary use case for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

Black Duck SCA vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 13% of the time

CAST SBOM Manager vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 12% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 7% of the time

Semgrep vs Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Competitors

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

Invicti vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

GitLab vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis

August 2026

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis report

Download Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis product report

Download Veracode product report

July 2026

Also Known As

CxSCA

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis offers robust features for identifying vulnerabilities in open source components. It integrates seamlessly into development processes, ensuring security from the start with its user-friendly interface and AI-enhanced suggestions. Ideal for .NET and Java applications.

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is an essential tool for developers looking to manage and secure open-source components. Known for its ease of integration and user-friendly design, it excels in providing comprehensive security by detecting vulnerabilities and offering actionable solutions. Developers gain from its configurability and visibility into library vulnerabilities. It further supports development with version upgrade suggestions and detailed insights, ensuring secure open-source component integration. Enhancing its effectiveness, AI-powered suggestions minimize false positives and improve scalability. While optimization of speed, performance, and pricing are anticipated, its strong integration capabilities within CI/CD pipelines make it a preferred choice for secure software development.

What are the key features of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and enhances usability for developers.
Incremental Scan Capability: Allows efficient continuous security assessments.
Vulnerability Detection: Provides detailed insights and solutions for identified issues.
AI-powered Suggestions: Minimizes false positives and enhances efficiency.
License Management: Assists in handling and managing license issues effectively.

What benefits can users expect from Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?

Enhanced Security: Maintains robust protection against vulnerabilities in open source components.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Visibility and Insight: Offers detailed insights into potential risks within libraries.
Scalability: Supports large-scale integration without compromising on performance.

In industries like banking and insurance, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis proves instrumental. Utilizing static code analysis, it assists these sectors by identifying security weaknesses in software. Its integration capability with CI/CD pipelines ensures that applications adhere to strict industry compliance and security standards.

Checkmarx

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.