"It is very easy and user friendly. It never requires any kind of technical support. You can do everything on your own."
"One of the strong points of this solution is that it allows you to incorporate it into a CICB pipeline. It has the ability to do incremental scans. If you scan a very large application, it might take two hours to do the initial scan. The subsequent scans, as people are making changes to the app, scan the Delta and are very fast. That's a really nice implementation. The way they have incorporated the functionality of the incremental scans is something to be aware of. It is quite good. It has been very solid. We haven't really had any issues, and it does what it advertises to do very nicely."
"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is its ability to identify vulnerabilities in open-source components, especially if some critical issues exist."
"What's most valuable in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is that it provides security from the start. In the traditional approach, an enterprise or company validates the solution before launching to a production environment, but in the modern approach, security must be checked and provided from the beginning and from the design, and this is where Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis comes in. The solution helps you make sure that every open-source application that you use is secure, and that there's no vulnerability inside that open-source application."
"Good reporting functionalities."
"It can have better licensing models."
"Its pricing can be improved. It is a little bit high priced. It would be better if it was a little less expensive. It is a good tool, and we're still figuring out how to fully leverage it. There are some questions regarding whether it can scan the MuleSoft code. We don't know if this is a gap in the tool or something else. This is one thing that we're just working through right now, and I am not ready to conclude that there is a weakness there. MuleSoft is kind of its own beast, and we're trying to see how we get it to work with Checkmarx."
"In terms of areas for improvement, what could be improved in Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is pricing because customers always compare the pricing among secure DevOps solutions in the market. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis has a lot of competitors yet its features aren't much different. Pricing is the first thing customers consider, and from a partner perspective, if you can offer affordable pricing to your customers, it's more likely you'll have a winning deal. The performance of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis also needs improvement because sometimes, it's slow, and in particular, scanning could take several hours."
"Instant updates for end users to identify vulnerabilities as soon as possible will make Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis better. The UI of the solution could also be improved."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
More Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis Pricing and Cost Advice →
Enjoy a free DevOps platform cloud subscription
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is ranked 10th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 4 reviews while JFrog Xray is ranked 9th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 1 review. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is rated 9.0, while JFrog Xray is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis writes "Has a straightforward setup, identifies vulnerabilities, and offers good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "Stable, scalable and offers great reporting functionalities". Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is most compared with Black Duck, Fortify Static Code Analyzer, FOSSA, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and Mend, whereas JFrog Xray is most compared with Black Duck, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle, Fortify Static Code Analyzer and FOSSA.
See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
