We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Check Point Intrusion Prevention System has great profiles, and we can continuously create, modify, activate, deactivate or configure any specific setting to allow the profile to focus on just one thing or for certain attacks.""IPS easily allows follow-up flags on recently updated patterns. If, in rare cases, a false positive does occur, it is quickly detected and an exception can be easily created.""I can generate reports for management automatically based on the threats of the last day/week/whatever is needed.""IPS signatures can be set quite granularly depending on your environment. You can filter on performance impact, severity, and confidence which makes sizing and adapting easier.""The number of the IPS protections is amazing - after the latest update I see more than 11000 in the SmartConsole.""The most valuable feature is that it protects us against hundreds of different attack vectors, like ransomware. The protection is always being triggered. People try to access websites that are categorized as malware, so when the users do a DNS request for the IP of those malware websites, the IPS Blade replaces the real IP of the website that is malware with a bogus IP. The user gets an IP that doesn't exist and when he tries to access, it won't work.""This is a very stable product.""There's an automatic update after every 2 hours which makes sure that the database is up to date and providing zero-day vulnerability protection."

More Check Point IPS Pros →

"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention.""Edge protection is a valuable feature.""Everything has been okay with the solution. We are using all of the features.""For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto.""I like the solution's interface."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Pros →

Cons
"It is generally good, but improving the performance would be the one thing I'd take a look at right now.""In my opinion, the Check Point software engineers should works on the performance of the blade - when it is activated with the big number of the protections in place, the monitoring shows us the significant increase in the CPU utilization for the gateway appliances - up to 30 percents, even so we are cherry-picking only the profiles that we really needed.""Sometimes protections are 'aggregated' into a single threat name when you look at the logs. I would prefer to see all protections named individually (for example, right now, 'web enforcement' is a category that contains several signatures).""There is a performance impact on the NGFW post-enabling the IPS blade/Module, which can even lead to downtime if IPS starts to monitor or block high-volume traffic.""After the R80 release, there are almost all feature sets available under IPS Configuration. However, further to this, adding a direct vulnerability scan based on ports and protocol for every zone (LAN, DMZ, or Outside) will make Check Point very different compared to other vendors on the market.""The cost is a bit high but it is worth it.""Threat Prevention policies are not very easily manageable as there are several profiles/policies/etc. Therefore, there are several ways to add exceptions and check the configuration.""I am not aware of a preview channel or some repository to have a preview on upcoming signatures, however, this would be nice to have."

More Check Point IPS Cons →

"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved.""The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive.""The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are.""In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support.""The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement."

More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that the price of support is around $40,000 USD or $50,000 USD per year."
  • "The price of this product should be reduced."
  • "Enabling IPS does not require any additional license purchase from OEM, as it comes by default with the NGFW bundle."
  • "The pricing for Check Point IPS is competitive and brings good value for the money."
  • "The module has a considerable cost but you can save by purchasing a package with several modules instead of making a single purchase."
  • More Check Point IPS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
  • "The pricing could be lower."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    I can generate reports for management automatically based on the threats of the last day/week/whatever is needed.
    Top Answer: 
    I'd advise users to bundle the things they want; so they get a cheaper offer.
    Top Answer: 
    Sometimes protections are 'aggregated' into a single threat name when you look at the logs. I would prefer to see all protections named individually (for example, right now, 'web enforcement' is a… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The resource consumption should be addressed. The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement. The pricing could be better.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,503
    Comparisons
    2,100
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    729
    Rating
    9.2
    Views
    5,932
    Comparisons
    5,106
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    269
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) combines industry-leading IPS protection with breakthrough performance at a lower cost than traditional, stand-alone IPS software solutions. IPS delivers complete and proactive intrusion prevention – all with the deployment and management advantages of a unified and extensible Next Generation Firewall solution. Learn more about IPS Software.

    Threats do not discriminate between application delivery vectors, requiring an approach that has full visibility into all application traffic, including SSL encrypted content, with full user context. Threat Prevention leverages the visibility of our next-generation firewall to inspect all traffic, automatically preventing known threats, regardless of port, protocol or SSL encryption.

    Offer
    Learn more about Check Point IPS
    Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention
    Sample Customers
    Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
    University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Logistics Company18%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm11%
    Healthcare Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Government6%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point IPS is ranked 4th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 13 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is ranked 12th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews. Check Point IPS is rated 9.2, while Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point IPS writes "Protects us against hundreds of different attack vectors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention writes "Easy to configure and easy to operate with great stability". Check Point IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco NGIPS, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Vectra AI, whereas Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate IPS and Vectra AI. See our Check Point IPS vs. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.