

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) compete in the cybersecurity sector focusing on intrusion detection and prevention. Based on the feature set, Palo Alto seems to have the upper hand with user-friendly interfaces and strong threat detection capabilities.
Features: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention offers next-gen firewall capabilities, content filtering, and advanced threat prevention. The WildFire sandboxing and machine learning for threat detection are notable. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) features strong intrusion detection and prevention, with valuable integrations like Talos for intelligence sharing and anomaly detection, noted for flexibility and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could improve its integration with email filtering, licensing setup, and support documentation. Resource consumption and initial setup complexity are other concerns. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) needs enhancements in ease of configuration, GUI design, and reduction of false positives. It is costly, with licenses needed for full functionality, and could enhance machine learning capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks is available in on-premises and public cloud environments, known for its flexible deployment despite configuration complexities. Its support is rated favorably, with suggested improvements in communication. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is mainly used in on-premises and hybrid cloud setups; it is stable, with reliable support, although faster technical assistance is desired.
Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks is regarded as expensive, challenging for smaller organizations. Users acknowledge its strong security features as a worthwhile investment. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is also expensive, with significant licensing fees. Users find value in its security capabilities, providing reliable performance, though cost is a concern when evaluating against security needs.
It offers insights into security threats, despite the inability to quantify its impact in numbers.
Fortinet, on the other hand, offers quicker response times and same-day RMAs, which gives them an edge in customer service.
Compared to SonicWall security services, Cisco's technical support has no competition.
The response was fast, and they provided experts to solve our issues quickly.
Overall, I find the technical support from Palo Alto Networks quite good, although getting a hold of the TAC can be challenging and sometimes requires long phone calls.
I have proof of this rating - when I escalate a case, I receive a reply from TAC support after two days.
I rate technical support from Palo Alto as eight out of ten.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is scalable and works well wherever enforcement points exist.
The software situation with Cisco is problematic.
I recommend it to other users, but I am concerned about stability, as the stability is not adequate.
Proper sizing of the firewall models ensures that the system does not experience crippling performance issues.
CLI is very important in professional working, and it was an unwise decision by Cisco to remove it.
Incorporating AI capabilities would enhance its functionality.
I am aware that we are not measuring some metrics or tracking access through Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS).
Palo Alto needs to focus on how to bring that technology to end users and how easy it is to use, especially in a hybrid environment where users work from various locations.
The behavioral detection capabilities could be expanded to address all threats at the perimeter, reducing the reliance on endpoint detection and response systems.
It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscription costs.
I would rate the price for Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) as high.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate firewalls.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) helps me with the visibility component, providing visibility across more than 3,000 applications using Firepower IPS.
They can discover new versions of malware, which is very beneficial.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is quite powerful for threat detection and includes botnet detection.
As traditional signature-based mechanisms become less effective due to the evolving nature of attacks, this solution's focus on behavioral analysis is crucial.
We are satisfied with the analytic capabilities of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, especially the reporting features available in the Palo Alto portal in terms of their application visibility interface, which is very good for us to get visibility on all critical applications and the associated users, as well as the risks associated with every category of traffic.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) | 3.5% |
| Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention | 3.9% |
| Other | 92.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 26 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) provides advanced threat detection, intrusion prevention, and malware protection. Its strengths lie in automated infiltration detection, centralized management, and interoperability with Cisco's security offerings, catering to sectors like banking requiring robust network security.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) empowers network security through features like DDoS protection, anomaly detection, and enhanced network visibility. It delivers application-level visibility and fortifies firewall capabilities. Known for its scalability and cost-effectiveness, NGIPS integrates with Cisco systems to bolster threat detection across perimeters, data centers, and campuses. While appreciated for technical support and documentation, NGIPS is evolving to improve its interface, SSL inspection scalability, and cloud integration. Users seek enhancements in threat detection, SIEM integration, and dashboard functionality, aspiring for better documentation and AI capabilities over time.
What are the key features of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)?In industries like banking, Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is predominantly deployed on-premises to ensure high-security levels, integrating seamlessly with Cisco's broader security tools. It is essential in sectors needing superior threat detection and management at critical network points.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention provides comprehensive security with application control, real-time threat detection, and seamless integration with cloud services. Known for its high performance and ease of use, it addresses diverse security challenges for modern organizations.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention integrates machine learning, behavioral analysis, anti-malware protection, and WildFire sandboxing to deliver proactive defense against threats. Its features include advanced firewall capabilities, comprehensive bandwidth management, and robust reporting. Integration with cloud-based URL filtering enhances organizational security efforts. While the tool offers significant protection, areas like pricing, ease of use, false positive management, and documentation clarity require improvement. Expanding AI capabilities and optimizing support will enhance threat prevention and user experience.
What are the most important features?Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is implemented across industries for server protection and LAN/WAN traffic security, providing solutions for network testing and application control. Organizations benefit from features like GlobalProtect VPN, anti-spyware, and vulnerability protections, ensuring security through efficient deployment both on-premises and in the cloud.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.