Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Check Point IPS offers peace of mind, cost savings, and efficient protection, providing significant ROI through enhanced security and reduced downtime.
Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Secure IPS improves threat detection, though setup costs impact ROI recognition, yet users acknowledge enhanced network protection.
Efficiency has improved, as we've seen a reduction in attack investigations and also seen efficiency in systems administration, security-wise.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Check Point IPS support is generally reliable and responsive, although some users experience delays due to detailed resolution processes.
Sentiment score
7.3
Cisco Secure IPS customer service is responsive and expert, though regional variability suggests room for improvement in initial response times.
The customer support for Check Point IPS is great.
Our technical teams have personal relationships with our account executives and direct support people.
Fortinet, on the other hand, offers quicker response times and same-day RMAs, which gives them an edge in customer service.
The response was fast, and they provided experts to solve our issues quickly.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Check Point IPS scales well across network sizes, supporting both on-premises and cloud deployments, enhancing performance and flexibility.
Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Secure IPS scales well for various organizations but faces hardware constraints and high costs affecting flexibility.
We have moved to a hyper-scale master environment, allowing us to scale by adding additional gateways to the clusters.
Check Point IPS's scalability is good, as it can handle growth easily if our organization expands.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Check Point IPS is praised for stability and reliability, with minor hardware concerns and high user ratings.
Sentiment score
7.6
Cisco Secure IPS is generally stable and reliable, though some users report bugs and mixed feelings about its dependability.
Check Point IPS provides a very stable and reliable environment.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point IPS users need better detection, performance, support, documentation, integration, and automation, with concerns about cost and licensing.
Cisco Secure IPS users desire better SIEM integration, user-friendliness, third-party tools support, and enhanced management with AI and cloud integration.
Automated attack path correlation in SmartEvent to improve situational awareness.
I believe they can improve on the algorithms to better identify and predict attacks, and they can also add its binaries to reduce false positives.
Visual analytics and automated attack path correlation in SmartEvent to enhance situational awareness and attack identification.
Incorporating AI capabilities would enhance its functionality.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point IPS pricing is costly, but offers value with bundling, simple licensing, and justifiable costs through performance benefits.
Cisco Secure IPS is costly but valued for strong security, with potential deals and discounts available through vendor negotiation.
Comparisons with Fortinet show that Check Point IPS is relatively more expensive, but we found it cheaper to retain it rather than switch.
It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscription costs.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point IPS is praised for its protection, ease of use, integration, and effective threat management with minimal false positives.
Cisco Secure IPS offers robust threat detection, seamless integration, and adaptable security features for comprehensive and cost-effective network protection.
The integration with Check Point ThreatCloud ensures the IPS engine is updated with the latest attack signatures.
The solution employs behavioral heuristic analysis to block zero-day attacks using AI-powered engines.
It made audits easier by helping us pass an audit check, and it also helped to reduce attacks; we've seen actually, ever since we got it, we've not yet gotten any attack, but we've been able to identify possible attacks to our organization.
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is quite powerful for threat detection and includes botnet detection.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point IPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
68
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Check Point IPS is 5.3%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 4.5%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Devroede - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable tool that provides its users with intrusion protection functionalities
Based on what I hear from my full-time firewall administrators, the upgrade process or the maintenance of the devices for each firmware upgrade requires one to break the cluster and run a specific moment at a time, a single node concept. I hear from my admin that the firmware upgrade process is quite cumbersome. Our company has made Check Point very well aware of the cumbersome firmware upgrade process, including the other customers as well. The aforementioned details can be considered for improvement. The price of the product needs to be improved since it is an expensive solution. All the components of Check Point IPS are expensive, while licenses of the product exceed all its other expenses. If you have a data center without infrastructure, you will suffer from losses on a monthly and yearly basis due to DDoS attacks, which we know about since we have the data for ourselves. It is up to each customer to determine how long he can lose his data center, and then you count if it is possible to lose it for that amount of time, and if you don't, then pay the price for the firewall.
Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga - PeerSpot reviewer
Effectively identifies malicious behavior while future automation and AI advancements hold potential
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) ( /products/cisco-secure-ips-ngips-reviews ) is quite powerful for threat detection and includes botnet detection. It effectively blocks unwanted software, hashes, and suspicious behaviors. The tool is easy to integrate with other IT security solutions due to similar protocols. The system offers effective threat detection features, although automation capabilities are not yet fully utilized.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
University
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point IPS?
The most valuable feature of the solution is called tunneling. Tunneling is one of the major security features that hackers cannot penetrate through.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point IPS?
Comparisons with Fortinet show that Check Point IPS is relatively more expensive, but we found it cheaper to retain it rather than switch.
What needs improvement with Check Point IPS?
I believe Check Point IPS can be improved by making it more proactive and predictive and fine-tuning the false positives. When I say more proactive and predictive, I believe they can improve on the...
What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco NGIPS?
Cisco is one of the top brands known for cost-effectiveness, making it worth the money. It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscri...
What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?
In the future, I hope to see automation features like automatic blocking and rule creation. Additionally, incorporating AI capabilities would enhance its functionality.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.