We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"They offer free trials, which is quite appreciative and grabs more attention from new users and businesses."
"We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."
"The most valuable feature we have found in Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its rich logging capabilities."
"It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."
"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."
"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"It offers high performance and improved productivity for users."
"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."
"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."
"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."
"GitHub's version control is valuable."
"We use GitHub as a repository."
"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."
"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."
"GitHub provides the SFH key to protect our passwords and connection."
"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."
"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."
"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."
"For the next release, I would suggest considering features like enhanced threat intelligence integration."
"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security needs to improve updates on integrations. It also needs to incorporate real-time monitoring features."
"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."
"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."
"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."
"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."
"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."
"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"Scalability is an area with a shortcoming, because of which it has room for improvement."
"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."
"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."
"GitHub could add some more security features."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 29 reviews while GitHub is ranked 13th in Application Security Tools with 64 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Fortify on Demand. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
