Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs GitHub comparison

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
2,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and CloudGuard WAF are prominent tools in their respective categories, with GitHub focusing on code collaboration and CloudGuard WAF on web application security. Based on the comparison, GitHub has the upper hand in user-friendly branch management and community support, whereas CloudGuard WAF excels in security features and compliance.

Features: GitHub includes robust source code management, seamless integration with SSH keys, and valuable collaboration tools, which facilitate efficient branch management among teams. CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security measures like AI-driven threat detection, Intrusion Prevention Systems, and compliance with protocols including PCI-DSS, enhancing application and cloud security.

Room for Improvement: GitHub should enhance its integration with CICD tools, provide better support for large files, and tackle UI complexity issues. Improving functionality for multiple branches is also recommended. CloudGuard WAF needs to focus on enhancing documentation quality, resolving latency issues, and offering more cost-effective cloud security integration, alongside improving update and support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is widely used on Public and Hybrid Clouds, benefiting from community support and a straightforward deployment process. Official support is satisfactory but could improve responsiveness. CloudGuard WAF is employed across diverse cloud environments, including Private Clouds, and while deployment is typically smooth, its technical support requires improvement in responsiveness and overcoming language barriers.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub presents a cost-effective solution, offering a free version and reasonable pricing for private repositories, with users noting time-saving benefits and a positive ROI. In contrast, CloudGuard WAF, despite its comprehensive security offerings, is perceived as expensive, with complex pricing structures and initial high costs, although it provides satisfactory ROI through robust security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. GitHub

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.7

Organizations experienced significant ROI with Check Point CloudGuard WAF, enhancing security, reducing costs, and improving NIST compliance.

Sentiment score

5.0

GitHub provides efficient code management, cost benefits, secure code, and organizational advantages, enhancing market delivery and user experience.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at Odyssey Software

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.4

Mixed feedback on CloudGuard WAF support; praised for effectiveness but some users report delays and suggest improvements.

Sentiment score

6.5

Users primarily rely on community resources for support, but some desire quicker access to GitHub's technical support.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

I have not used GitHub's technical support extensively because there are many resources and a robust knowledge base available due to the large user community.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.5

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers excellent scalability and flexibility, efficiently handling traffic and supporting multi-cloud environments seamlessly.

Sentiment score

7.7

GitHub efficiently supports global teams with scalable, cloud-based infrastructure, ensuring performance and stability for diverse user and project sizes.

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It handles increasing traffic easily because we can extend our demands based on our needs.

Hailemichael Yigrem

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at Deliver ICT and Telecommunication Technology PLC

We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.

reviewer899619

Consultant at Boxpeg

GitHub is more scalable than on-prem solutions, allowing for cloud-based scaling which is beneficial for processing large workloads efficiently.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly stable and reliable, with minimal downtime and quick issue resolutions, crucial for finance.

Sentiment score

8.7

GitHub is stable, supports over 1,000 users effectively, with transparency and reliable updates appreciated, despite minor issues.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

It provides a reliable environment for code management.

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

GitHub is mostly stable, but there can be occasional hiccups.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost reduction, improved support, simpler UI, better integration, enhanced protection, and comprehensive reporting.

GitHub needs improved security, integration, AI enhancements, UI/UX, search, docs, automation, and support for better user experience.

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It's not something you manipulate, it's not an antivirus where you deal with signatures, updates, and upgrades every day.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

I would say that the more automation this product has, the easier it will be to work with it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing competitive despite initial costs, valuing features, support, and flexible packages.

GitHub provides cost-effective subscription options with a free basic version, ideal for public use, and competitive pricing for enterprises.

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.

Raj Test

Lead Software Engineer at The 5 Chairs

The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Platform Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers scalable management, AI-driven security, seamless integration, reduced maintenance, and enhanced compliance with real-time alerts.

GitHub offers robust community support, security, version control, integration with DevOps tools, and flexibility for distributed teams.

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Amministratore Della Sicurezza Di Rete at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

The pull request facility for code review.

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub report

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment.

Aeron Gonzales

Quality Assurance Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (11th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The initial cost of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is high.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

There are improvements that can be made regarding pricing since it has a high initial cost. If they could reduce that, it would be beneficial. Additionally, it has a complex initial configuration. ...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

August 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Download GitHub product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent