Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs GitHub comparison

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,347 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are competitors in the software tools market, focusing on source code management and application security, respectively. GitHub seems to have the upper hand for collaboration due to its extensive integrations and community support.

Features: GitHub's notable features include Git Hooks, SSH keys, and advanced security, offering robust options for managing code efficiently and securely. Its cloud-hosted services and seamless integrations with tools like Jenkins and Jira enhance its collaborative capabilities. On the other hand, Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels with AI-driven threat prevention, automated policy management, and seamless cloud integration, effectively supporting complex security needs.

Room for Improvement: GitHub encounters challenges with limited project management features, integration complexities, and UI issues. Users often mention slow upload speeds and a notably steep learning curve. For CloudGuard WAF, desired improvements include better documentation, faster support, and enhanced integration capabilities. Some users find its setup process cumbersome and report inconsistencies in its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub benefits from strong community support, which reduces the need for direct technical assistance, although official support can be inconsistent. Similarly, CloudGuard WAF is praised for its customer service and technical assistance but could improve support responsiveness and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub is recognized for its cost-effectiveness, particularly with its free and open-source offerings, offering significant value to organizations using premium versions despite cumbersome account management. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is considered costly; however, its comprehensive security features justify the price. Users acknowledge its benefits in providing substantial security ROI relative to some alternatives.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. GitHub

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (13th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides security for our customers and our products."

"The solution offers sophisticated security techniques with unique characteristics that can be particularly valuable for the financial sector, which is where we develop apps."

"Overall, it's a good solution, and it fulfills all our core purposes, providing complete visibility and security."

"The tool performs device health checkups and updates us. It helps us to be compliant with regulatory policies."

"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."

"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."

"The first valuable feature is that it is not a complex process to get it up and running. It was not complex at all. We were in a close relationship with the team that developed the app, and it worked in a few hours. The second valuable feature is the information that comes out of it."

"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"The solution can scale."

"I have found GitHub stable."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"GitHub is easy, secure, and widely documented."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"Has great integration with third-party tools."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement."

"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."

"Pricing is high, although possibly justified by the service received."

"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."

"I have encountered issues with Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's technical support. It also has missing configuration features."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations."

"I would like it to be able to analyze more complex functions, although I did not examine the case study of more complex implementations. Things like forum fields, etc seem to need a little more focused protection of the fields scheme validation."

"When I migrate the traffic from our mobile application to CloudGuard, we are not getting what we expected."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"I use the free version of the tool."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

I am less knowledgeable with prices because I only define the requirements and look at the execution. I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits ...

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

I would like it to be able to analyze more complex functions, although I did not examine the case study of more complex implementations. Things like forum fields, etc seem to need a little more foc...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 16% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

May 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Download GitHub product report

April 2025

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF (Web Application Firewall) is a cloud-native security solution designed to protect web applications and APIs from known and unknown threats. It employs contextual AI and machine learning to prevent zero-day attacks without relying on traditional signature-based detection methods, ensuring that applications remain secure even as new threats emerge.

CloudGuard WAF offers preemptive protection against vulnerabilities by using machine learning to identify and block zero-day threats like Log4Shell and Spring4Shell. It provides precise detection capabilities, minimizing the need for constant fine-tuning and reducing false positives. Designed for cloud-native environments, CloudGuard WAF integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, supporting automated deployment and configuration through infrastructure as code (IaC) or APIs.

Key Features of CloudGuard WAF:

ML-Based Threat Prevention: Stops application-layer attacks, including those listed in the OWASP Top 10, with minimal tuning and no reliance on signature updates.
API Discovery and Security: Identifies and secures APIs, preventing misuse and enforcing API schemas to protect against unauthorized access.
Bot and DDoS Prevention: Detects and mitigates automated attacks that can disrupt services or degrade customer experiences.
Intrusion Prevention (IPS): Provides protection against over 2,800 web-related CVEs using Check Point’s award-winning IPS technology.

Benefits of CloudGuard WAF:

Zero-Day Protection: Mitigates risks from newly discovered vulnerabilities without waiting for signature updates.
Reduced Operational Overhead: Eliminates the need for constant manual tuning and exception handling, simplifying security management.
Comprehensive API Security: Enhances control over your attack surface by discovering and securing all APIs, including shadow, rogue, and deprecated endpoints.
Fast and Easy Deployment: Deployable within minutes via WAF as a Service (WAFaaS), requiring only a one-time DNS configuration for immediate protection.

CloudGuard WAF is particularly suitable for organizations using modern, cloud-based architectures that require robust, automated security measures for both applications and APIs. Its capabilities are valuable for industries that handle sensitive data, such as finance or healthcare, where compliance and data protection are critical. Pricing and support are typically customized to the specific needs and scale of the deployment, with options for continuous updates and maintenance through Check Point's managed services.

CloudGuard WAF by Check Point provides advanced, AI-driven protection for web applications and APIs, offering automated, precise threat prevention and easy integration with cloud-native environments, ensuring robust security without the need for extensive manual configuration.

Check Point Software Technologies

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent