Carbonite Server vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Quorum are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #54, while Quorum is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quorum’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

5,008 Views
3,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quorum OnQ

Read 22 Quorum OnQ reviews

5,985 Views
4,070 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Quorum OnQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Carbonite Server and Quorum OnQ both compete in the data protection solutions category. Quorum OnQ stands out due to its advanced features and comprehensive data protection capabilities.

Features: Carbonite Server offers efficient backup capabilities, ease of use, and affordability. Quorum OnQ provides quick recovery times, comprehensive data protection, and advanced disaster recovery features.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could improve performance speed, expand integration options, and enhance documentation. Quorum OnQ could benefit from a more streamlined setup process, improved documentation, and a simpler user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Quorum OnQ has a more complex deployment process but is praised for strong customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server is cost-effective, providing significant value for its price. Quorum OnQ has higher upfront costs but offers better long-term ROI due to advanced features and performance reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Quorum OnQ

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

54th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quorum OnQ

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

46th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

35th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quorum OnQ is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Quorum OnQ	0.9%
Carbonite Server	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

reviewer2594778

Senior Application Analyst at a non-profit with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enhanced filtering for advocate emails

Quorum provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history. This is an extreme feature that will help our advocacy department a lot. It encompasses the ability to formulate emails and calls to action across regions. Their platform is more advanced than our previous one. It provides a smooth training experience and easy terminology for those in the advocacy world.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

More Carbonite Server pros

"Mostly, onQ gives us confidence, knowing that we're really covered if we really have to bring the systems up."

"It provides a smooth training experience and easy terminology for those in the advocacy world."

"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."

"Whether it is a single server failure, storage failure, network failure, a digital attack or a ransomware, or whether it's an application crash or a database corruption, or any kind of natural disaster or data center failure, Quorum ensures the recovery of the complete business process."

"The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and the speed is incredible. My large Exchange Server went from 5- to 6-hour backups down to 22 minutes."

"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery, as it instantly boots up the protected VM and this product is easy to use."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

More Carbonite Server cons

"I don't love the scheduler, as I think that interface could use an overhaul."

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs."

"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

"I would really like it if they followed comparable products from other vendors and had an option where you could offload to tape. I know it sounds incredibly antiquated, but the benefit I see is that there would be a better air gap than you have with backing up to an online source."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive."

"The one thing they could do is some tweaking on the web solution that's supposed to monitor everything from one page, rather than having to bring each server up on its own webpage. It doesn't always accurately show what the system's state is at the time, and we have to restart that process now and then."

"The cost could be reduced."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."

"When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quorum OnQ?

We launched all of our advocacy departments through Quorum next month. We are in the process of uploading all of our data and creating custom fields.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 6% of the time

HYCU vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

October 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

October 2026

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

OnQ

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Quorum OnQ offers disaster recovery and high availability with fast recovery, ensuring continuity by quickly spinning up virtual machines. It supports secure data management with 256-bit AES encryption and provides streamlined backup processes, enhancing data safety against threats like ransomware.

Quorum OnQ is designed for users needing efficient server restoration and data management. It allows seamless server recovery, automated testing, and versioning capabilities. Users benefit from a user-friendly interface and the ability to test virtual environments without operational disruption. Quorum OnQ enhances data safety through secure encryption and efficient backup processes. While it streamlines server monitoring with a "Single Pane of Glass" feature, improvement is needed in its scheduler design, enhanced disaster recovery testing, and OS support. The upgrade process can be lengthy, and better integration with cloud services like Azure is desirable. Quorum OnQ's pricing and support response times should be improved, and additional backup options for NAS and tape security are needed.

What are the key features of Quorum OnQ?

Quick Recovery: Ensures minimal downtime with fast server restoration.
One-Click Restoration: Simplifies server recovery to enhance efficiency.
Automated Testing: Validates backup systems through automated processes.
Secure Data Management: Utilizes 256-bit AES encryption for data protection.
Virtual Machine Spin-up: Allows non-disruptive testing of environments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and system management.
Seamless Server Monitoring: "Single Pane of Glass" provides centralized management.

How does Quorum OnQ Impact ROI?

Fast Recovery of Business Processes: Minimizes downtime and restores operations quickly.
Enhanced Data Security: Protects essential data from threats like ransomware.
Efficient Integration: Supports seamless interactions with existing systems.
Operational Efficiency: Suits disaster-prone regions through reliable performance.

Quorum OnQ is used in industries where disaster recovery and data availability are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, making it versatile for backing up production and operational servers, including file, email, and financial servers, ensuring minimal business disruption.

Quorum

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Quorum OnQ

November 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Quorum OnQ report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.