Carbonite Server vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus comparison

OpenText and IBM are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.8. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,029 Views
857 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Read 30 IBM Spectrum Protect Plus reviews

1,837 Views
1,332 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus and Carbonite Server are prominent data protection solutions. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus has the upper hand with advanced features and robust support, while Carbonite Server stands out for cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment.

Features: IBM Spectrum Protect Plus users value comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities, integration with virtual environments, and a robust feature set. Carbonite Server users find simplicity, quick recovery times, and straightforward deployment beneficial.

Room for Improvement: IBM Spectrum Protect Plus users highlight complexity, occasional performance issues, and a steep learning curve. Carbonite Server users seek enhanced scalability, versatile data recovery options, and broader functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Spectrum Protect Plus has a more involved deployment process but offers strong customer service. Carbonite Server provides easier deployment and adequate customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Spectrum Protect Plus has higher initial setup costs but delivers substantial ROI through extensive capabilities. Carbonite Server is cost-effective, offering reasonable ROI given its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (21st)

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Dale Dirkes

President at DIAD Consulting, Inc.

A simple, efficient, reliable product

The efficiency and convenience are excellent. The pricing is very good. It shows you what has been updated via little green dots. The solution is very automatic. I don't have to worry about it. It was easy to set up. Technical support has been helpful in the past. The solution has been problem-free.

Read full review

Atif Najam

Chief Information Officer and Program Lead at Gatron Industries Ltd

Has very good integration features and can quickly backup data and optimize storage

I would like to see continuous data protection (CDP). If there is machine failure, you don't have to go to the backup copy that you took 12 hours ago. You can actually go back to the backup copy made half an hour ago. That is, it would be good to have certain-point-in-time recovery. I would like them to add global deduplication. With deduplicate backups, deduplication will work only with the data of a certain machine or a certain backup set. Usually, the data is repeated across the data of the backup sets. However, if IBM Spectrum Protect Plus provides a global deduplication option it will ultimately result in better storage savings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The API is very good."

"There is protection against disasters with good, fast, reliable recovery options."

"The initial setup of IBM Protect Plus is simple and not complex."

"Large-scale recoveries are very straightforward."

"Some of the features we find very valuable and use a lot, are retention sets."

"A full-featured data protection solution that is reliable and stable."

"This is a multi-platform backup solution where you can take a backup from AIX, Windows, or Linux servers and restore from CD, disk, or tape."

"The solution is scalable and can be fitted for any customer."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus pros

Cons

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The software's technical support could improve its response time for different time zones."

"Not particularly user friendly."

"The tool needs to increase the number of threats."

"The backup support for IBM Power Virtualization needs to be added."

"The replication feature is not available."

"I think the graphical reports are a shortcoming of the tool since it fails to provide my company with what we want in terms of reporting. Due to the product's inability to take care of its reporting part, we have to use third-party software."

"The one issue we are facing is related to file restores."

"In the future, I would like to see support for global deduplication."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"I rate the price of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus a one on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is very cheap."

"There are a few options available for purchasing the solutions. Overall, the price of the is high."

"Clients prefer to buy a perpetual license, but the majority opt for a yearly subscription."

"If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive."

"The initial cost of the product is perpetual but the support fees are billed annually."

"Depends on the licensing options that you choose."

"There is an annual license required to use IBM Spectrum Protect Plus. The cost of the license could improve, it is expensive."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, we paid for implementation and training."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Carbonite Server?

I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Server?

The ability to perform instant recovery would be a game changer. For a large user base, the creation of user accounts at this time is a little cumbersome, there isn't any Single-Sign-On (SSO) integ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Server?

I work for a managed services provider, and we supply the solution for various sized customers.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that the product works and helps with restoration areas whenever there is a need to restore something.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

It is probably based on the number of CPUs. They are fairly expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

With ransomware protection and cyber protection, more improvement is possible. IBM provides these through a third party, so enhancement is needed. There's significant room for improvement. They are...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 34% of the time

Zerto vs Carbonite Server

Compared 29% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Carbonite Server

Compared 11% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 10% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

IBM Spectrum Protect vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 57% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

April 2025

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

April 2025

Download IBM Spectrum Protect Plus product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is a data protection and availability solution for virtual environments that can be deployed in minutes and protect your environment within an hour. It simplifies data protection, whether data is hosted in physical, virtual, software-defined or cloud environments. It can be implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data governance with scale and efficiency.

IBM

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

PT Wings Surya, Tectrade, State of Ohio

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

April 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.