We performed a comparison between Camunda and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is stable."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The flexibility is great."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."
"The content management is great."
"The solution is scalable."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"It's very easy."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."
"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 27th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Camunda vs. IBM Case Foundation report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
