Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Calabrio ONE vs Deepgram comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Calabrio ONE
Ranking in AI Scheduling & Coordination
9th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Workforce Engagement Management (4th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (10th)
Deepgram
Ranking in AI Scheduling & Coordination
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Text-To-Speech Services (4th), Speech-To-Text Services (1st), AI Customer Support (5th), AI Sales & Marketing (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Scheduling & Coordination category, the mindshare of Calabrio ONE is 3.8%. The mindshare of Deepgram is 5.8%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Scheduling & Coordination Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Deepgram5.8%
Calabrio ONE3.8%
Other90.4%
AI Scheduling & Coordination
 

Featured Reviews

GS
Customer Service Analyst/Scheduler at Tucson Electric Power
The Copy Schedule Activities reduces time spent for changing activities. Agents are not able to cancel an approved request in the Time Off Request area.
I cannot speak about the difference for the QM software. My main use is of the WFM software. A few of the features were "nice to have" features, but version 9.3 had some "deficiencies". The main problem was not being able to run scenarios in a pseudo scheduling area, so the way Calabrio is now, agents can possibly see test scenarios. Another problem is the Time Off Request area. Agents are not able to cancel an approved request through this area. The sorting/filtering could be improved upon greatly. We are scheduled to upgrade to version 10.0, which will resolve many of the issues we do not like about the current version that we are using. Update: We are still on version 9.3 and looking forward to upgrading.
Arunkumar HG - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Architect & Hands-On Leader | Prototyping, Automation, AI/LLM Integration | 20+ Years in at Regalix
A Powerful, Adaptable, and Constantly Evolving STT Solution for Voice Automation
Honestly, Deepgram has been exceptionally proactive in addressing the primary area that needed improvement. My main challenge was with the real-time detection of when a user has finished speaking in a live conversation, which is critical for a responsive voice bot. They directly solved this by releasing their Flux model. Because Flux is a recent release, I haven't yet had enough time to thoroughly test it and identify new limitations. At this stage, any "improvement" would be more of a "nice-to-have" feature rather than a fix for an existing problem. The core service is already very robust and meets all of our current needs. What additional features should be included in the next release? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Looking toward the future, here are a few features that could add even more value to an already excellent platform: * Advanced Built-in Analytics: While I can get the raw transcript and build my own analytics pipeline, it would be powerful to have features like sentiment analysis, emotion detection, or automatic summarization offered directly through the API. This would save significant development time. * More Granular Speaker Diarization: For calls with multiple participants, enhancing the real-time speaker diarization (labeling who is speaking) to be even more precise would be a fantastic addition for creating detailed call analyses. * Tighter Integration with TTS: Since Deepgram is also expanding into Text-to-Speech (TTS), offering a more seamlessly integrated STT-to-TTS pipeline could simplify the development stack for creating voice agents from start to finish. * Specialized, Pre-Trained Industry Models: While the general models are highly accurate, offering even more specialized, pre-trained models for specific industries like finance, healthcare, or legal-which are heavy on specific jargon-could push the accuracy even higher for those niche use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Copy Schedule Activities has been a favorite tool. It reduces time spent when I need to make changes which are identical to multiple agents' schedules."
"The most valuable capabilities of Deepgram that I've found so far include low latency, as it offers less than 200 milliseconds, which is not provided by any other text-to-speech models."
"The best thing with Deepgram is they are continually evolving and doing a lot of market research, and they take feedback seriously."
"Deepgram's low latency transcription has greatly impacted my ability to deliver reliable voice agents and provided very good transcription."
"The best features of Deepgram for me are the level of transcription accuracy it provides and the amount of time it saves."
"The features that I have been using in the tool have been very stable."
"Deepgram's transcription stands out compared to other solutions primarily due to its speed and accuracy; those are important points for me because not all providers or tools handled Spanish well, but Deepgram adjusted perfectly for that use case, and we also chose 11Labs voice, a South American voice, which worked very well with Deepgram."
"Deepgram is able to handle large volumes of audio data without compromising accuracy."
"The solution's Speech-to-Text conversion feature is really awesome."
 

Cons

"Being able to "publish" or rerun the schedule for only one agent would be ideal."
"Give agents the ability to cancel approved requests for time off. Vacation plans do actually change in the real world."
"I would like it to be more accurate."
"The traditional Speech-to-Text doesn't understand when the user is done speaking in bot conversations."
"Regarding improvements for Deepgram, I think the quality of the transcriptions could be enhanced, as the Spanish accent poses challenges, making it harder to transcribe some words, and considering additional accents from Chilean or Argentine speakers could improve the model's performance with local words."
"When I had an AI interview for coding, Deepgram didn't capture the names of programming languages or well-known LLMs accurately all the time."
"We've had issues in the past where it generates the transcript, and a lot of the text is duplicated."
"The area of live transcription could be improved. Sometimes, Deepgram's WebSocket is disposed due to redundancy."
"We haven't seen a return on investment with Deepgram so far; we have been building POCs for the last two years but recently switched to AWS in the last two months due to scalability issues with the pay-as-you-go model."
"Deepgram is currently restricted to only the English variants, but it should include other languages, such as German or French."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"When using Deepgram, one needs to pay for the hours or minutes for which the transcription is needed."
"The pricing is moderate."
"Deepgram is a cheap solution."
"The solution’s pricing is cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Scheduling & Coordination solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise29
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deepgram?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as I found it to be cheaper without any problems.
What needs improvement with Deepgram?
Even though Deepgram has many customization options, I wish that Deepgram had voice cloning customization to a much larger extent. I also wish that the price were a bit lower if possible.
What is your primary use case for Deepgram?
My main purpose for Deepgram was to convert meeting voices to text very easily, and the other purpose was for content creation. I mostly use Deepgram for those two purposes.
 

Also Known As

Calabrio
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Polaris, Equifax, Fedex, Rabo, Paychex, Virteva, VITAS Healthcare Corp, Keurig Green Mountain, AT&T, Esurance, Subaru, Boeing, Tiffany & Co., Thomson Reuters.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Calabrio ONE vs. Deepgram and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.