Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] vs ScienceLogic comparison

Broadcom and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.
ScienceLogic
Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews
  • 3,857 Views
  • 424 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, IBM and others in IT Operations Analytics.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: October 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
October 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Digital Operational Inte...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ScienceLogic
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (26th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (10th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1273302 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good performance, efficiency, and focuses on monitoring
When you choose a solution, you compare the bad points and the good points with the requirements that are needed. DOI does have some bad points. The real bad part is that it's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud. In the beginning, I first started to check on-premise solutions to integrate in the future with Cloud models. So when we chose DOI, we knew the bad point was its obligation to use the Cloud or the SaaS model. But it's not a bad point now because Cloud and SaaS computing is the future of IT. But it's too early to really know about the security and what the other companies are seeing and changing. Monitoring information is critical for a company - information about the IPs, names that we keep, and some technical information. Also critical is the security of the monitoring itself. Broadcom manages the security of the data well. If you have securable monitoring and your team is already using Century or other products, DOI is not a good choice because DOI is not open-source. DOI is a static solution so you will not have access to the code. It is difficult with Sharepoint, too. If you are not in the habit of managing your static Broadcom relationship, it's not easy. The support is in India and it's already closed by the midday shift. The Broadcom support is very bad. I had a previous integration of Broadcom and their static software. But I was able to manage the support. But for new customers, it's quite difficult to create this relationship. Please keep in mind, Broadcom is a very huge company and when you're small or medium, about 1,000 or so employees, if you don't have the team, monitoring will be difficult. If you start a new company or are a startup, don't use Broadcom software. You don't have the weight to negotiate with Broadcom. It's not a bad point with DOI, just a bad point with the Broadcom relationship. But if you only choose DOI, keep in mind that the product is not only its technical capabilities, but also it's support relationship with the enterprise. We already plan to integrate automatic recognition in future releases. Now we don't use a major part of the automatic recognition. The plan is to create or automatically correct some command execution or re-run of the image and to integrate the VPN. The next step is to use the automatic recognition and to bypass the human intervention and to have automatic intervention of the critical system.
Read full review
Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The features that I have found most valuable are the machine learning and the algorithm. We tried seven solutions. The good points of DOI are performance and efficiency under machine learning systems."
"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."
More ScienceLogic pros
 

Cons

"It's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
"They should improve their support process and add chat."
"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."
More ScienceLogic cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."
"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."
"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."
"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."
"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."
"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."
"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."
"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."
More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ScienceLogic?
The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?
I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] Competitors
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic Logo
Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic
Compared 12% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic
Compared 10% of the time
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic Logo
Zabbix vs ScienceLogic
Compared 9% of the time
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic
Compared 6% of the time
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs ScienceLogic
Compared 6% of the time
More ScienceLogic Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
October 2025
CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] reportDownload CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
ScienceLogic
September 2025
ScienceLogic reportDownload ScienceLogic product report
 

Overview

CA Digital Operational Intelligence enables IT operations teams to make smarter, faster decisions for enhancing user experience and improving IT service quality and capacity through cross-domain contextual intelligence. Built on an open, powerful engine, it is the leading advanced analytics solution in the market that provides users with comprehensive insights by ingesting and analyzing a diverse data set including metric, topology, text and log data. The machine learning–driven analytics, along with out-of-the-box visualization and correlation, helps drive a superior user experience and deliver significant operational efficiencies.

Broadcom

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
  • PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
  • Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
  • Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
  • Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
  • Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
  • Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
  • Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
October 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, IBM and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: October 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.