Bonita vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

Bonitasoft and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while ServiceNow is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. Bonitasoft holds a 4.2% mindshare in PA, compared to ServiceNow’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,086 Views
2,376 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ServiceNow Orchestration

Read 16 ServiceNow Orchestration reviews

2,029 Views
1,988 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bonita

ServiceNow Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Bonita and ServiceNow Orchestration are both prominent products in the business process management and automation category. ServiceNow Orchestration is often seen as superior due to its advanced automation capabilities, which cater to complex enterprise needs better than Bonita.

Features: Bonita offers customizable workflow and process automation, robust open-source options, and detailed documentation that aid ease of use. ServiceNow Orchestration provides advanced integration tools, comprehensive process automation, and service mapping, making it suitable for large-scale enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could benefit from reducing its implementation time and enhancing its platform versatility to cater to more environments. ServiceNow Orchestration might be improved by simplifying integrations and reducing complexities in the deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita is known for its quick setup and efficient support, which is advantageous for small to mid-sized projects. ServiceNow Orchestration, while requiring a more complex implementation, offers extensive support options, making it ideal for larger enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita presents an affordable upfront cost with potentially high ROI due to its lower initial expenses, making it attractive for cost-sensitive projects. ServiceNow Orchestration, despite its higher setup costs, provides a significant return on investment for organizations requiring extensive integration and automation features, making it suitable for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Process Automation

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th), Business Process Management (BPM) (18th)

ServiceNow Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 4.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Orchestration is 4.0%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

Dinesh Kumar Raghu

Senior Software Engineer at NewRocket

Fastest upgrading technology in the market currently

In each upgrade, ServiceNow is enhancing its product across various areas. They continuously improve different aspects one by one, ensuring that their service evolves with the changing needs. However, frequent upgrades may negatively impact the performance of instances. Therefore, for now, I don't recommend any additional upgrades. The current version fulfills everyone's requirements, and ServiceNow automatically updates annually, keeping pace with industry standards. They've been performing well, so I see no need for further upgrades, especially considering their consistent updates.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"Development of forms and flows."

"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."

"The user interface is easy to use."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

More Bonita pros

"It has competitive AI capabilities."

"It is a very stable product, highly affordable."

"The solution effectively automates business processes."

"It's probably the best product out there."

"The product has a flexible interface for development."

"Great with IT processes and business processes."

"Provisioning of new systems is among the most impactful features for automating complex workflows with ServiceNow Orchestration."

"It's scalable."

More ServiceNow Orchestration pros

Cons

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"Installation could be made easier."

"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

More Bonita cons

"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."

"It is a highly complex platform to work on."

"The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."

"From my space, the only thing that I can say is the spinning up with Google Cloud Services."

"There can be gaps in integration."

"Efficiency of some features could be improved."

"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."

"Frequent upgrades may negatively impact the performance of instances. Therefore, for now, I don't recommend any additional upgrades."

More ServiceNow Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"You pay an annual fee and can have an unlimited number of processes and users."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"It is not very expensive."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about ServiceNow Orchestration?

The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in l...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Orchestration?

The cost of ServiceNow Orchestration is considered medium; it is expensive but powerful. I would rate the pricing experience as a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ServiceNow Orchestration?

The third-party integrations are challenging when the tools are not from ServiceNow ( /products/servicenow-reviews ) partners. This presents issues when integrating solutions from other vendors.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 46% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 13% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Camunda vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 47% of the time

Control-M vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 16% of the time

Temporal vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More ServiceNow Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

August 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

ServiceNow Orchestration

July 2025

Download ServiceNow Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

No data available

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

July 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.