Camunda vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Logo
19,156 views|11,568 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
ServiceNow Logo
2,743 views|1,749 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Camunda and ServiceNow Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model.""Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes.""We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.""It has an open BPM""One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility.""Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate.""The graphical interface is very beneficial.""The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."

More Camunda Pros →

"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time.""The solution effectively automates business processes.""It's scalable.""This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge.""The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations.""The product has a flexible interface for development.""Great with IT processes and business processes.""The data visualization is good."

More ServiceNow Orchestration Pros →

Cons
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks.""I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java.""While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning.""In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese.""The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training.""The product does not have a dictionary.""When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly.""The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."

More Camunda Cons →

"There can be gaps in integration.""I would like a user experience module to be added.""There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly.""There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion.""The deployment requires awareness among the project staff.""We cannot perform GUI automation using the tool.""ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to include improvements in a similar manner that they did in Sweden.""The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."

More ServiceNow Orchestration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."
  • "This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."
  • "ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."
  • "The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."
  • "It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."
  • "The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."
  • "It is not very expensive."
  • More ServiceNow Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Top Answer:The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in… more »
    Top Answer:The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to… more »
    Top Answer:ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    19,156
    Comparisons
    11,568
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    911
    Rating
    8.2
    13th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    2,743
    Comparisons
    1,749
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

    Sample Customers
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews while ServiceNow Orchestration is ranked 13th in Process Automation with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while ServiceNow Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Orchestration writes "Fastest upgrading technology in the market currently". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Visio, whereas ServiceNow Orchestration is most compared with IBM BPM, Control-M, Nintex Process Platform, BMC TrueSight Orchestration and F5 BIG-IQ. See our Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.