BMC AMI DevX vs Docker comparison

Read 57 Docker reviews

3,376 Views
304 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC AMI DevX and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, Pega, Camunda and others in AI Software Development.

To learn more, read our detailed AI Software Development Report (Updated: January 2026).

Download the complete report

AI Software Development

January 2026

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (7th), Database Development and Management (18th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (6th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (6th)

Docker

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Development Platforms (1st), Container Management (4th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd), AI Software Development (4th)

Featured Reviews

RobertSamson

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization

Using BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS has greatly improved our database administration tasks. Although we don't test the database before production, we have experienced benefits in disaster recovery situations and capacity management. For instance, when facing capacity issues during peak transaction times, I've been able to quickly allocate additional resources to ensure smooth operations. This has been crucial, especially during times when the demand surges, such as peak flight hours.

Read full review

reviewer2787357

Site Reliability Engineer at Granicus Inc.

Containerization has standardized deployments and drives faster, more reliable delivery

As Docker is already a very mature tool, there are areas where it can be improved based on real-world usage. One area I consider is the Windows container experience. The pain point here is that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers because I have worked in both environments and felt that Windows containers are heavier and slower than Linux containers. This also limits the ecosystem and tooling maturity compared to Linux containers. Improvements could include performance optimization and better parity with Linux container features. Apart from that, observability and debugging is another area. The pain point is the limited native metrics available and limited logging and tracing features. Improvements could include adding a good amount of metrics, logging, and tracing, as well as better built-in observability features and easier container introspection. Network complexity is also present. I face issues with Docker networking that can become confusing in complex setups, and debugging container-to-container issues is not always intuitive. Improvements can be made with simpler networking abstractions and better built-in troubleshooting tools. Docker is excellent for containerization and CI/CD, but it can be improved in areas of built-in security, network simplicity, and observability. These points should be kept in mind and worked on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Test data management capabilities are good."

"Once we got the configurations and deployment rolled out, it was very stable. I haven't had any major issues with Eclipse or the Topaz Workbench plugins."

"From a user perspective, the GUIs make it easier for people to see and interact with files on the mainframe."

"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

"We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter. It's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

"The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is beneficial in application development."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The most valuable features of Docker are its security, detailed documentation, and ease of use, and the Docker Swarm is not as complex as Kubernetes."

"The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server."

"The solution is easy to install."

"The most valuable feature of Docker is automation. When I deploy the solution I am confident it will work anywhere. It is reliable and easy to use."

"We find the auto scaling and auto healing functionality of this solution very good."

"The most valuable feature of Docker is its portability, ease of security management, and low resource usage."

"The stability is excellent."

"I think the best feature is to replicate anything in our local machine using a simple command."

More Docker pros

Cons

"It would be nice to have an audit trail to see what mainframe developers are using what."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"The ability to edit source code that has special characters is limited. The ability to incorporate or convert REXX into macros that are usable under the Topaz software is not there. And the REXX macros that I have developed over 40 years of work are useless, so I have a toolbox I can't use or deploy using the Topaz technology, while I can use it under MVS."

"It's a very complicated tool."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"We'd like knowledge transfer to be easier."

"The solution is not easy to manage and it is one of the reasons why people introduce orchestration tools to manage it."

"Docker can improve the integration with Microsoft Windows. It does not support native installations."

"Docker needs to improve its pricing."

"I would like to see a single package image orchestration bundled together."

"In terms of communication between services, perhaps the configuration within networks between containers could be improved."

"The Kubernetes blocks need improvement since Docker has many holes in it."

"They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process."

More Docker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"The price point is great."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"I use the solution's open-source version."

"Docker has made some changes and there is an enterprise version that is affordable."

"The current cost for us is nothing as an open source."

"For commercial use, it's about $30 per month. The license itself isn't expensive, but if there are many users, the price becomes high."

"I would rate the pricing of Docker as ten out of ten"

"Docker is a free open-source solution."

"The offering and service are quite free."

"The solution offers an open-source version that is free and includes a lot of functionality."

More Docker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Compuware File-AID?

The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is ...

What needs improvement with Compuware File-AID?

We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its...

What is your primary use case for Compuware File-AID?

We use the solution clone test files.

What do you like most about Docker?

We are using Docker to host applications.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker?

The setup cost has balanced out, and I find Docker's pricing reasonable. Docker Engine is free and open source for Linux, and Docker Desktop is free for individual developers and small teams, but a...

What needs improvement with Docker?

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Docker

Compared 10% of the time

Portainer vs Docker

Compared 9% of the time

Minimus vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Docker

Compared 7% of the time

Codespaces vs Docker

Compared 6% of the time

More Docker Competitors

Product Reports

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

BMC AMI DevX

February 2026

Download Docker product report

February 2026

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

No data available

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Docker provides a robust containerization platform, enabling identical environments across machines. With features like portability, fast deployment, and minimal resource consumption, Docker supports development, facilitating multitier architectures and integrating seamlessly with Kubernetes.

Docker offers an advanced containerization solution that enhances application management through automation and security measures. By isolating environments and managing dependencies, Docker supports platforms for scalable application development. Its integration with orchestration tools like Kubernetes and independence from host operating systems enable developers to create lightweight applications effectively. Although known for its cost efficiency and flexibility, Docker could improve in areas such as stability, command-line usability, and Windows performance integration. Users also point out the need for enhanced documentation, simplified management tools, and better persistence storage options, along with stronger marketing and easier user adoption.

What important features does Docker provide?

Containerization: Creates consistent environments across machines.
Portability: Runs on different hosts with ease.
Fast Deployment: Speeds up application launches and updates.
Security: Offers isolation and management of dependencies.
Scaling: Supports application scaling and multitier architectures.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Docker?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces resource usage with lightweight containers.
Flexibility: Integrates with orchestration tools like Kubernetes.
Performance: Enhances resource utilization and onboarding.
On-premises Management: Simplifies managing cloud and local setups.

Industries leverage Docker for application packaging, deploying microservices, and CI/CD processes. It supports DevOps, enhances backend service management, and enables resource-efficient development environments. Docker's compatibility with tools such as Jenkins ensures seamless integration and orchestration in modern IT workflows.

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Information Not Available