We performed a comparison between Codespaces and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product allows us to implement feature-related changes or improvements on time. Whenever I write a section of the code or create a new code, it automatically integrates with the former code."
"The most valuable features of the solution are Copilot and Advanced Security."
"Codespaces' most valuable feature is the repository, which helps the developers to work together. Its data commands are also useful."
"Docker is perfect for what I do...The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is its portability, ease of security management, and low resource usage."
"The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is its integration with other solutions, such as KVM and AlmaLinux."
"We find the auto scaling and auto healing functionality of this solution very good."
"The solution is stable."
"Containerization is the most valuable feature. I can communicate to the Docker containers using other containers."
"Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."
"We get merge conflict errors and need to resolve them."
"The technical support could respond faster."
"The product indicates incorrect statistics."
"Unfortunately, base images are not currently available."
"Deployment could be quicker."
"The security layer is very vulnerable, although they are working to improve the system hardening and email hardening."
"There may not be much room for improvement with Docker as it has greatly evolved. However, one area that could be improved upon is the documentation on their website which was once easy to follow but has become quite terrible with numerous versions being released. As an example, the installation process for Docker now requires more than just a one-line command, causing inconvenience. Additionally, based on my experience as a college instructor, teaching students to install Docker was a difficult task due to the lack of straightforward and easy-to-follow documentation. Docker should focus on improving their documentation to make it more user-friendly for all."
"I have encountered network issues while connecting with microservices. I want to optimize the application layers over the bucket. It should also have better documentation."
"Docker could improve by having more advanced features."
"Management can be improved with the necessary tools for orchestration."
"They should provide proper documentation to understand the solution's cgroup process."
Codespaces is ranked 5th in Development Platforms with 3 reviews while Docker is ranked 2nd in Development Platforms with 40 reviews. Codespaces is rated 8.6, while Docker is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Codespaces writes "Used to integrate into the CI/CD process and streamline the editing and updating of code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". Codespaces is most compared with AWS Cloud9, Replit, JetBrains IDEs, RStudio and dbForge Studio for MySQL, whereas Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Codespaces vs. Docker report.
See our list of best Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
