BMC AMI DevX vs Endevor comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #3. BMC holds a 15.6% mindshare in SCM, compared to Broadcom’s 18.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews

4,709 Views
989 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Endevor

Read 45 Endevor reviews

1,854 Views
1,780 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Endevor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Endevor and BMC AMI DevX compete in software configuration management for mainframe environments. Data indicates that BMC AMI DevX offers superior overall value due to its comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Endevor is known for solid change management, version control, and process automation features. BMC AMI DevX offers advanced integration capabilities and enhanced analytics tools, providing detailed insights and support for modern development practices.

Room for Improvement: Endevor could enhance its footprint checking process and ease of use for new features. BMC AMI DevX might improve by simplifying initial setup and reducing the complexity of its extensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Endevor offers straightforward deployment with consistent customer support, fitting more traditional workflows. BMC AMI DevX involves a more complex setup but is backed by well-regarded customer service, aiding in the transition.

Pricing and ROI: Endevor provides a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations seeking decent ROI. BMC AMI DevX compensates for its higher cost with advanced features, offering potentially higher ROI for enterprises needing extensive integration and analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. Endevor Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Endevor

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

1st

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (7th), Database Development and Management (18th), Test Data Management (6th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (6th)

Endevor

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

3rd

Ranking in Mainframe Application Development

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 15.6%, down from 29.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Endevor is 18.5%, down from 34.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Configuration Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BMC AMI DevX	15.6%
Endevor	18.5%
Other	65.9%

Software Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

RobertSamson

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Improves disaster recovery processes and offers an efficient CPU cycle optimization

Using BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on z/OS has greatly improved our database administration tasks. Although we don't test the database before production, we have experienced benefits in disaster recovery situations and capacity management. For instance, when facing capacity issues during peak transaction times, I've been able to quickly allocate additional resources to ensure smooth operations. This has been crucial, especially during times when the demand surges, such as peak flight hours.

Read full review

Haim Ben Zagmi

R&D Team Leader at First International Bank of Israel

A highly stable tool for managing mainframe software development projects that require significant expertise

We use the basic feature set of Endevor to control and track all of the sales operations within our company. It is a very good product that allows safe management of the individual components. The tools are specifically designed for mainframe environments, providing features tailored to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a user perspective, the GUIs make it easier for people to see and interact with files on the mainframe."

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."

"I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information."

"We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter. It's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"Test data management capabilities are good."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"They've got plug-ins now to run it through Eclipse, they've got a lot of APIs, they handle UNIX files. I can't really think of any serious lack that they haven't addressed."

"We can make it do pretty much whatever we want, depending on just how complicated we want it to be, as it is pretty flexible."

"The tools are specifically designed for mainframe environments, providing features tailored to the unique requirements of the systems, ensuring there are no mistakes."

"The developers can very easily see what has changed on a particular piece of source code or a program, and others can look at that as well so they can coordinate their changes. It makes it much easier to promote a piece of code up to production."

"It offers security and audit of changes in information assets (software)."

"The most valuable feature of Endevor is customization and ease of use."

"It was an easy install. Since it was all set up, it pretty much runs itself now."

"It's the audit-level tracking. If something has gone wrong I can go back and figure out what happened, who did it."

More Endevor pros

Cons

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing. I know they have some out there that we are not licensed for at this time, but it seems like some of the Eclipse tools that are used for other programming languages, they're all just built-in and they're a little more intuitive to the developers. Making those testing tools as intuitive as possible, and as integrated as possible into the workbench, would be really beneficial."

"Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs."

"It would be good if the vendors would work together or at least have some collaboration between them, so they would know what would work and what wouldn't work. Right now, the way things are working, they're relying on the customer to make everything work."

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"It often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"The initial setup can be less complex and has room for improvement."

"Learning the tool for the first time was extremely difficult, and it could be because of all the other processes we had around it. But knowing you can do these things in batch, you can do things in the foreground or online mode, and then these, you have to have a package for. There are these rules, and some of the concepts inside the tool are not clear, like what is the CCID? Why do I have to have one? What is that? And how is it used? As a developer, it's not important to me - I don't know what a CCID is, and I don't care - but apparently it's important to someone."

"Interfacing with some change control products that are not CA's, it's a little glitchy on the approvals of changes. It requires special needs for the users for approvals."

"I would like to have better integration with other products."

"There are a lot of screens in it. The process for moving out my other solutions, it could be more convenient. There are a lot of steps to go through and a lot of screens to go through to get it accomplished."

"One feature of Endevor is its Backout feature. If there is a problem, it can back out the executables. The only problem with that is that it will not back out the source in Endevor. For example, you can do a back out and it will back out the executable to the previous version, but it doesn't back out the source version in Endevor. It would make it much better if when you did a back out of Endevor, it would back out both the source and the executable and keep them in sync."

"If I had to comment on an area of improvement or something new in the next or future version, I would like to see AI-assisted coding and impact analysis for mainframes."

"They need to ditch the Eclipse plugin and just make the development environment for Z the standard Eclipse interface."

More Endevor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"The price point is great."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"Just make sure if you are going to license, ensure you license the right features."

"Licensing is fairly simple, you don't need multiple licenses."

"The solution is very expensive."

"It's competitively priced and, as far as I know, it's just an enterprise license. We have found it is worth the money."

"The product is expensive."

"It's worth the value. The pricing is fairly good, justifiable for the return on investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Compuware File-AID?

The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Compuware File-AID?

We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Compuware File-AID?

We use the solution clone test files.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 9% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs Endevor

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Endevor

Compared 13% of the time

CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs Endevor

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Endevor

Compared 5% of the time

More Endevor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

February 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Endevor

February 2026

Download Endevor product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA Endevor Software Change Manager, Endevor Software Change Manager, CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe, CA Endevor SCM

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Endevor is a comprehensive tool designed for managing source code within mainframe environments, known for its robust version control, data security, and audit trail capabilities, all contributing to efficient application life cycle management.

Endevor offers extensive customization, automation that reduces manual tasks, and seamless integration with Enterprise DevOps, which makes it suitable for managing complex development processes. It simplifies version tracking and history logging, enhancing traceability, which is crucial for audits. Security controls ensure code safety and the integrity of application migrations. However, users see room for improvement in streamlining the setup complexity and enhancing the graphical interface to cater to non-mainframe platform users.

What are the key features of Endevor?

Data Security: Offers strong security measures to protect code and data.
Audit Trail: Provides comprehensive monitoring of changes for audit readiness.
Version Control: Maintains robust version management for code consistency.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Enterprise DevOps for streamlined workflows.
Customization: Allows flexible modifications to suit specific needs.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Standardized Processing: Ensures consistent operations across environments.

What benefits should users seek in Endevor reviews?

Efficiency: Reduced manual tasks leading to cost-effective project management.
Consistency: Standardized operations improve reliability and performance.
Traceability: Enhanced version tracking supports thorough audits and compliance.
Security: Robust protections safeguard valuable code against unauthorized access.
Flexibility: Customization options meet unique development demands.
Integration Capabilities: Complements existing dev workflows effectively.
Scalability: Supports large-scale development projects with ease.

In industries reliant on mainframes, Endevor is pivotal for managing source code efficiently. It facilitates application migration, software change management, and automates compilation processes. Organizations value its role in maintaining code integrity and providing the necessary security and auditing capabilities. Implementation often involves development teams utilizing it for managing testing cycles, coordinating multi-client applications, and ensuring seamless production deployments.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

Blue Hill Data Services Inc.

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. Endevor

January 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. Endevor

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. Endevor and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. Endevor report.

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors and best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.