BlazeMeter vs IBM Rational Test Workbench comparison

Perforce and IBM are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #20. Perforce holds a 10.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to IBM’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,544 Views
3,862 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

459 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Rational Test Workbench and BlazeMeter are competing in software testing tools. BlazeMeter seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and integration with open-source tools.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench offers extensive test automation for web, desktop, and mobile, excellent integration within IBM’s ecosystem, and robust functional testing capabilities. BlazeMeter provides powerful load testing, seamless Agile and DevOps integration, and cloud-based test execution, allowing for easy simulation of realistic world traffic and continuous testing with minimal setup.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench could improve by simplifying its complex setup, enhancing cloud support, and streamlining customer onboarding. BlazeMeter may enhance its test data management features, support more detailed functional testing, and improve reporting integration within teams lacking advanced technical skills.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying IBM Rational Test Workbench can be complex and require significant time due to its wide feature set, though it offers comprehensive support. BlazeMeter’s cloud-based architecture ensures quick deployment and seamless integration, with efficient customer service and support through cloud flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench generally involves higher upfront costs but provides substantial ROI for businesses seeking extensive automation features. BlazeMeter offers a subscription-based model with lower initial expenses and scalable pricing, providing cost-effectiveness for companies focused on performance testing and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in API Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th), Load Testing Tools (3rd)

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in API Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 10.5%, down from 16.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Good integration with other tools, stable, scales easily

There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation. This includes the workbench as well as the other tools. In the future, I would like to see the other types of tests supported, that are not already covered in the DevOps approach. This would include, for example, penetration testing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its most valuable features are its strong community support, user-friendly interface, and flexible capacity options."

"BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."

"BlazeMeter has provided me with a vast cloud platform to run JMeter script files, eliminating the need for storage or load providers."

"The user interface is good."

"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."

"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."

"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time."

More BlazeMeter pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

Cons

"The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating. I would rate it as a seven because they respond once they are available."

"The reporting capabilities could be improved."

"The product could improve in areas such as mobile testing and the integration of AI analytics."

"BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for."

"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."

"We encountered some minor bugs, and I would like to have the ability to add load generators to workspaces without having to use APIs. We can't do that now, so we're beholden to the APIs."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports."

"The only downside of BlazeMeter is that it is a bit expensive."

More BlazeMeter cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"The solution is free and open source."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 41% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 19% of the time

Perfecto vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 17% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

August 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

August 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

July 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. IBM Rational Test Workbench report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors, best API Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.