Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

BlackBerry and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #79, while Trellix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8. BlackBerry holds a 0.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Blackberry Dynamics Apps
Read 2 Blackberry Dynamics Apps reviews
  • 64 Views
  • 3 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 7,629 Views
  • 1,575 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Blackberry Dynamics Apps are products competing in the cybersecurity space, each with unique strengths. Data comparisons show Blackburny leads with its feature set, justifying its higher price point.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers advanced threat detection, comprehensive endpoint management, and seamless integration with existing systems. Blackberry Dynamics Apps focuses on mobile security with a container-based approach, ensuring data protection and excelling in mobility and data security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix provides straightforward deployment focusing on integration and customer support. Blackberry Dynamics offers a flexible deployment model tailored to complex mobile environments with reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive pricing with a focus on maximizing security ROI through efficient endpoint protection. Blackberry Dynamics, while costing more, delivers significant ROI in mobility and data security enhancements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Blackberry Dynamics Apps
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
79th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 4.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee - PeerSpot reviewer
A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app
I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.
Read full review
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."
"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."
"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."
"The performance is good."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros
 

Cons

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."
"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."
"The solution's technical support should be improved since we faced a lot of issues with the support. There were some delays in responses from the technical support."
"The resolution time should be faster."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"Every time we open a ticket with McAfee, their response differs and they are not consistent."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."
"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."
"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"The product is expensive."
"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."
"We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"The pricing is more or less the same as the other tools in the market."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
20%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 17% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 8% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
January 2025
Blackberry Dynamics Apps reportDownload Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
June 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

BLACKBERRY DYNAMICS PLATFORM
THE FOUNDATION FOR POWERFUL AND SECURE MOBILE APPS
Built for the most demanding businesses and delivering high availability, disaster recovery and industry-leading scalability, BlackBerry® Dynamics offers an advanced, mature and tested container for mobile apps.

BlackBerry

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Buyer's Guide
Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
June 2025
Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.