Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

BlackBerry and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #77, while Trellix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.4. BlackBerry holds a 0.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Read 2 Blackberry Dynamics Apps reviews

60 Views
30 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,728 Views
1,103 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response and Blackberry Dynamics Apps are prominent cybersecurity solutions. Users tend to prefer Blackberry Dynamics Apps due to its comprehensive security capabilities, while Trellix EDR is favored for easier deployment and superior customer service.

Features: Trellix EDR provides proactive threat detection and response, detailed analytics, and an intuitive management system. Blackberry Dynamics Apps offers strong encryption, secure communication tools, and integration with multiple business apps, especially excelling in mobile security.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, a more flexible pricing model, and sometimes find its interface less user-friendly. Blackberry Dynamics Apps could benefit from improved integration with non-Blackberry products, a more streamlined interface, and better user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive support team. Blackberry Dynamics Apps has a more complex setup due to its extensive features, but it offers solid customer support as well.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is seen as more cost-effective with a quicker ROI due to lower setup costs and shorter implementation time. Blackberry Dynamics Apps, while more expensive, justifies its price by its extensive capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

77th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app

I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the solution's technical support team a nine and a half or ten out of ten."

"If there is any malicious behavior in the workstation or server, the tool stops or isolates it automatically and generates alerts."

"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."

"The most valuable feature I found in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the guided analytics or guided EDR investigation."

"The dashboard makes it easier and more effective to analyze data."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."

"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."

"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."

"I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements."

"The solution lacks the ability to integrate with external platforms. In future releases of the solution, I would like to see the solution increase its integration capabilities with external platforms."

"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."

"The CPU utilization of the product is quite high compared to its competitors."

"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."

"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."

"I'd like the tool to become more like an XDR, with one management system and endpoint activation."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"The price is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 49% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

April 2025

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

BLACKBERRY DYNAMICS PLATFORM
THE FOUNDATION FOR POWERFUL AND SECURE MOBILE APPS
Built for the most demanding businesses and delivering high availability, disaster recovery and industry-leading scalability, BlackBerry® Dynamics offers an advanced, mature and tested container for mobile apps.

BlackBerry

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

April 2025

Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.