Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs Microsoft Defender XDR comparison

BlackBerry and Microsoft are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #78, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. BlackBerry holds a 0.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Microsoft’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Read 2 Blackberry Dynamics Apps reviews

62 Views
31 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender XDR

Read 100 Microsoft Defender XDR reviews

6,401 Views
4,928 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Microsoft Defender XDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Microsoft Defender XDR and Blackberry Dynamics Apps are two prominent products in enterprise security solutions. Microsoft Defender XDR holds the edge in integration with Microsoft products and cloud infrastructure, while Blackberry Dynamics Apps is favored for its robust security features and mobile device management.

Features: Microsoft Defender XDR provides seamless integration with Microsoft 365, comprehensive threat detection, and unified visibility across various endpoints. Blackberry Dynamics Apps offers top-notch encryption, secure mobile communications, and advanced mobile device management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender XDR could improve in simplifying configuration settings, enhancing compatibility with non-Microsoft platforms, and bettering user interface design. Blackberry Dynamics Apps could enhance user experience design, provide broader cross-platform support, and offer better integration with third-party applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender XDR is praised for its straightforward deployment process for organizations already using Microsoft services, although customer service responsiveness could be better. Blackberry Dynamics Apps offers robust deployment but can be more complex for new users, with customer service rated higher in effectiveness and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender XDR is generally regarded as offering competitive pricing, particularly advantageous for businesses invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, providing quicker ROI. Blackberry Dynamics Apps, while perceived as more expensive, offers significant ROI for industries requiring stringent security measures, justifying the higher cost for those prioritizing data protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Microsoft Defender XDR

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

78th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Defender XDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

100

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (4th), Microsoft Security Suite (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender XDR is 3.2%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app

I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.

Read full review

Gabor Nyerd

Enterprise mobility and security evangelist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Includes four services and four products, which can help organizations a lot

We found that sometimes integrations work, but testing them can take some time. Sometimes, configurations take much longer than expected. We have a configuration in place that needs to be synchronized with another server. However, the servers are four hours apart, so this can cause delays. In general, I believe that the time it takes to configure and test a service should be shorter. Sometimes, it can take a couple of hours to test a single configuration setting. Other times, it is only ten or fifteen minutes, which is normal. However, sometimes, even immediate actions can be triggered by configuration changes, and some settings can take up to eight hours to complete. I believe that this time can be improved. Microsoft is making a lot of improvements to its services in a short period of time. This is a good thing, as it means that the services are constantly being updated and improved. However, it can be challenging for customers to keep up with the changes. For example, a customer may read about an update, understand it, and share it with their colleagues and boss. However, it may take days or weeks to test the update and get the necessary approvals. This can be especially challenging for large customers with many users or machines. In some cases, Microsoft may change a service before the customer has had a chance to implement the previous update. This can be frustrating for customers, as it means that they have to constantly learn new things and adjust their workflows. On the one hand, it is important for Microsoft to keep updating and improving its services. This helps to ensure that the services are meeting the customers' needs and that they are staying ahead of the competition. Microsoft should also be mindful of the challenges that these changes can create for customers. One way to address this challenge is to provide customers with more time to implement changes. Microsoft could also provide more information about upcoming changes so that customers can plan ahead. Ultimately, Microsoft needs to strike a balance between keeping its services up-to-date and providing customers with a smooth transition to new features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."

"The unified view of the threat landscape on a central dashboard is the most valuable feature."

"I like that it's fully integrated with Windows, Microsoft 365 Exchange Online, and Outlook. It is better than other antivirus solutions because it's fully integrated with all Microsoft products. It's easy to integrate them and onboard all Windows devices from SCCM."

"It has been great for us. Previously, we didn't have a solution to protect us, especially from malware, whereas now, we are getting protection up front, especially from the malware attacks coming through emails or endpoints."

"Microsoft XDR's system of analysis and investigation is super convenient for our customers. It integrates with other Microsoft solutions like Defender for 365 to protect email traffic from malicious external web links and phishing."

"It reduces the risk of users accidentally clicking on phishing emails."

"I rate Microsoft Defender XDR 10 out of 10."

"The EDR and the way it automatically responds to ransomware and other attacks are valuable features."

"What I like most about the product is its all-in-one solution. With Microsoft Defender XDR, we get coverage for various aspects like endpoint security, cloud security, and image-related cases, all within a single platform. This eliminates the need for multiple products or technical controls to address incidents. The main benefit became evident immediately after deployment, especially in its ability to analyze files and phishing emails quickly. By submitting suspicious files or emails, we receive quick results on whether they are legitimate, suspicious, or malicious, saving time."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pros

Cons

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."

"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."

"Stability could be improved by avoiding frequent changes to the interface."

"It would be beneficial to reduce the number of clicks required to navigate between blades, as the current navigation and breadcrumb system can be a bit confusing. Some inconsistencies exist between blades, which could be improved for a more seamless user and UI experience."

"In the future, it would be beneficial for Microsoft to consider making the product more user-friendly or simplified for those who are interested in using it. Currently, it requires a high level of technical expertise, making it challenging for beginners or less experienced individuals."

"The price could be better. It'll also help if they can continuously update and upgrade the solution. Every day there's a new virus uploaded into the network, and we have to keep updating it to identify all these things."

"Microsoft could improve on threat hunting and build more on threat detection and handling. The cybersecurity and cloud security posture features are a bit lesser than standard security products."

"There are a few technical issues with Defender XDR that can be improved. Sometimes, the endpoint devices are not reporting properly to the Defender 365 portal. When you're getting all the information from the Microsoft portal, the devices are sometimes not in sync. We have hundreds of endpoint devices, some needing to be onboarded again."

"In the beginning, it's difficult to navigate the system because it is quite large. Just trying to find your way and understand how the system works can be hard. After spending quite a lot of time searching it's a lot easier, but I wish it were a bit more user-friendly when you're trying to find things."

"The solution does not offer a unified response and standard data."

More Microsoft Defender XDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."

"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."

"Understanding the subscription model has been a bit challenging, as every feature or requirement comes with an additional cost."

"365 Defender is billed per account. I don't know the exact price, but my supervisor told me that Microsoft Defender is cheaper than the alternatives. It's bundled, so you get all the features in one place."

"The product is fairly priced for what we get from it."

"365 Defender can get expensive because you pay per gigabyte of data ingested. On the other hand, much of the data available in the other Microsoft security solutions are made available relatively cheaply—sometimes at cost or for free. Integrating only a limited set of third-party solutions with Sentinel would be cost-effective. It's much more affordable if companies only have Microsoft stuff."

"Defender XDR is included in the E5 license, but it's a bit too expensive."

"While Microsoft Defender XDR carries a higher cost, its ease of use compared to Defender may justify the investment."

"The most valuable licensing option is expensive, so pricing could be improved. Licensing options for this solution also need to be consolidated, because they frequently change."

"We have a lot of problems in Latin America regarding the price of Microsoft 365 Defender, because the relationship between dollars and the money of the different countries, it's is a lot. Many customers that have small businesses say that they would like the solution but it is too expensive. However, large companies do not find the cost an issue."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Microsoft 365 Defender?

Microsoft Defender XDR provides strong identity protection with comprehensive insights into risky user behavior and potential indicators of compromise.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Defender?

Licensing is somewhat confusing, particularly when presenting our pitch decks to stakeholders and leveraging key features in premium SKUs, but we managed with some assistance from Microsoft.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Defender?

There is nothing I can think of at the moment that needs improvement. I am a contractor and finishing up soon, so I haven't encountered any issues requiring enhancements.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 18% of the time

Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 10% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Defender XDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender XDR

April 2025

Download Microsoft Defender XDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender

Overview

BLACKBERRY DYNAMICS PLATFORM
THE FOUNDATION FOR POWERFUL AND SECURE MOBILE APPS
Built for the most demanding businesses and delivering high availability, disaster recovery and industry-leading scalability, BlackBerry® Dynamics offers an advanced, mature and tested container for mobile apps.

BlackBerry

Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.

It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.

Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Microsoft Defender XDR

April 2025

Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Microsoft Defender XDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Microsoft Defender XDR and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. Microsoft Defender XDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.