Basecamp vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Basecamp Logo
436 views|316 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
1,033 views|868 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Basecamp and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Basecamp vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ken Shaurette
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to network informally is great for communicating with colleagues.""The ease of use is valuable."

More Basecamp Pros →

"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable.""SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Pros →

Cons
"The product isn't easy to use. It's not very intuitive.""The solution could be more user-friendly."

More Basecamp Cons →

"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket.""The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The licensing costs are approximately $900 annually. I rate the price a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive.
Top Answer:The recent update on the solution has made it a little bit complex. For example, to create a team and a project, there is a separate button that you need to click. Recently they updated it with only… more »
Top Answer:The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of… more »
Top Answer:We use it for end-to-end project management as per the received requirements. There is a customized module called the Project Management System (PMS) where we receive the requirements. Once a… more »
Top Answer:SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs.
Ranking
22nd
Views
436
Comparisons
316
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
349
Rating
9.0
Views
1,033
Comparisons
868
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
945
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Portfolio and Project Management
Learn More
Overview
Basecamp is a web-based project-management tool developed by Basecamp and launched in 2004, with a new version being launched in 2012. Basecamp offers to-do lists, wiki-style web-based text documents, milestone management, file sharing, time tracking, and a messaging system. Basecamp Classic also offers integration with Basecamp's own Campfire product, and features APIs that are used by a host of web and mobile apps. Basecamp Classic's interface is available in different languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Italian, German, Finnish and Japanese). The newer version of Basecamp currently only supports English as the interface language.
Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.
Sample Customers
Ashland Addison Florist Co., Victory Auto Wreckers, Ideal Box Co., Hollymatic Corp.
Joy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Computer Software Company8%
Government5%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise75%
Buyer's Guide
Basecamp vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Basecamp vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Basecamp is ranked 22nd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews. Basecamp is rated 7.6, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Basecamp writes "Easy to navigate and good for communications but needs better documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "End-to-end project management capabilities and offers seamless vendor and client contract alignment". Basecamp is most compared with Planview Portfolios, Jira, Smartsheet and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Asana and Planisware. See our Basecamp vs. SAP Portfolio and Project Management report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.