Bacula Enterprise vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Bacula Systems and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Bacula Systems is ranked #24 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Bacula Systems holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

1,062 Views
907 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,381 Views
837 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Bacula Enterprise are two data protection solutions with different strengths and user experiences. Bacula Enterprise seems to have the upper hand in versatility and cost-efficiency, while OpenText Data Protector excels in user-friendliness and consistent performance.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is highly regarded for its automated backup schedules, robust security features, and efficient data recovery. Bacula Enterprise stands out for its flexibility, compatibility with a wide range of systems, and extensive customization options.

Room for Improvement: Users of OpenText Data Protector often cite the need for a more intuitive troubleshooting process, faster updates, and a more refined user interface. Bacula Enterprise users seek enhanced documentation, a more streamlined setup process, and improved user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector offers a straightforward deployment model that users find convenient, and they note the responsive customer service. Bacula Enterprise’s deployment is seen as more complex, though it allows broader system integration. Bacula’s customer service is helpful but occasionally slow to respond.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector users often mention that the pricing is on the higher side but justified by its reliable performance, leading to good ROI. Bacula Enterprise users highlight its cost-effectiveness, especially for larger-scale implementations, and feel they get substantial ROI through its flexible licensing.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (17th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Bacula is pretty stable."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"The solution has extensive documentation and a very active community."

"The most valuable features are the special plugins such as SAP HANA databases, Microsoft SQL, and various types of virtualization."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"The solution is easy to use."

"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its ease of management. It was not complex. In terms of features, I can mention a couple of things. For example, if you need to restore a VM, you can do it with multiple streams in OpenText Data Protector, which is an advantage over Commvault, from what I've noticed, having worked with multiple tools. Another thing is the Oracle backups; configuring Oracle backups is much easier in OpenText Data Protector."

"Integration with HP storage is a very strong point for Micro Focus Data Protector. It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore. Zero downtime backup (ZDB) is one very important feature, which is basically the integration with the storage array. It is a very strong feature. We're using storage with snapshots with this integration."

"This solution is quite stable because we have only three users."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"A more user-friendly interface (GUI) can be developed."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"Easier setup and configuration, perhaps including a GUI, would be an improvement."

"The scheduler setup could be better. We are facing some issues scheduling the job based on our requirements."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."

"We face challenges with its stability."

"The solution is not intuitive enough. I think they should work on the user experience and the graphical interface. These can be a lot better."

"We faced some certification issues after we upgraded to version 10.2."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."

"We have a perpetual license."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 51% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 65% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

April 2025

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.