We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very easy to use."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the snapshot capability."
"This solution works really well and it is simple to deploy."
"The most valuable features are the fast replication and recovery of data."
"The most valuable feature of Veeam Cloud Connect is the server backups, such as the Microsoft Windows server. Additionally, the updates provide useful enterprise functionality."
"I've found flexibility to the most valuable feature. I also like that it's scalable and that the stability is okay."
"The most valuable quality of Veeam Cloud Connect is its reliability."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very elastic. It's adaptable because it's very flexible and modular."
"One of the most valuable features of Veeam Cloud Connect is it does not require the use of an extremely fast internet connection for it to work. The backup process is automated which is great."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"It would be helpful if the enterprise edition was more complete. It's not as complete as the enterprise plus edition is. For instance, in the enterprise version, we can only use one accelerator with the cloud provider. It means if I have my Cloud Connect, I cannot connect another site of mine with another cloud connect and use an accelerator of Veeam. They should change this."
"The pricing is much higher than what our clients expect it to be."
"We were interested in investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in VMware. VMware right now is one of the biggest solutions in the world, in terms of the IT environment. But for Cloud Connect it's not. I think they need the cloud version to reach more customers, to enable the cloud version to be used by more people."
"Doesn't back-up from KVM."
"The solution needs to be more scalable. There should be no reason to set up Veeam Cloud Connect and have 10 servers in order to have a cloud backup. The initial setup could be easier."
"We need the solution to offer IT storage."
"The security of encrypted data could be better."
"I would like to see more advanced training courses made available to cover complicated use cases."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 23 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] writes "Simple and flexible backup solution". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, whereas Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.