Azure Site Recovery Logo

Azure Site Recovery pros and cons

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
111 followers
Post review
 

Azure Site Recovery Pros review quotes

Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2024
Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
Peter Maklin Aquino - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 29, 2023
Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems.
it_user1295826 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 16, 2020
They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dani Bachour - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2023
What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations.
HV
Feb 23, 2020
The solution is very easy to use.
Muhammad Saad Zahoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 16, 2022
What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution.
Rajesh Patel Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 30, 2023
Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR).
MikeChacker - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 12, 2021
The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.
RS
Nov 1, 2023
Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery.
AF
Apr 20, 2020
It is a very stable product and very scalable.
 

Azure Site Recovery Cons review quotes

Mike Douthitt - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2024
The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required.
Peter Maklin Aquino - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 29, 2023
The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing.
it_user1295826 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 16, 2020
It could include more of a backup and recovery.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dani Bachour - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 5, 2023
One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately.
HV
Feb 23, 2020
When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.
Muhammad Saad Zahoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 16, 2022
In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement.
Rajesh Patel Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 30, 2023
The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional.
MikeChacker - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 12, 2021
It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support.
RS
Nov 1, 2023
It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location.
AF
Apr 20, 2020
We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.