Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure NetApp Files vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Azure NetApp Files boosts performance, eases deployment, reduces downtime, and optimizes costs, despite higher initial expenses than on-premises.
Sentiment score
4.7
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is secure, cost-effective, and highly rated for code backup and deployment, despite modest financial returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Azure NetApp Files receives mixed feedback on support, praised for integration and ease, but some users seek more specialized assistance.
Sentiment score
4.6
Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers satisfactory support, with mixed reviews on response times and expertise, improved by premium subscriptions.
They have top-notch people.
I have a premium subscription for Oracle Cloud, which ensures a high level of support.
When issues arise, it takes them at least three to four hours to respond.
We implement security features such as WAF and virtual networks to protect information.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Azure NetApp Files is scalable, flexible, and cost-effective for large setups, but pricing concerns exist for smaller setups.
Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is praised for its scalable, flexible management, allowing seamless resource adjustment and efficient growth.
The scalability of Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it can be scaled easily.
We can adjust the number of CPUs as per our need and reduce the load.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Azure NetApp Files is rated highly for stability due to its reliability and consistency under increased workloads and migrations.
Sentiment score
7.3
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is highly stable and reliable, consistently rated positively for availability and performance by users.
The system is stable, especially when set up in a single region.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure NetApp Files needs improved features, cost efficiency, easier deployment, regional integration, and strengthened security to meet user demands.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs enhanced security, improved integration, better usability, and features similar to Azure and AWS.
I would like for them to have more compression so that it can avoid using more storage.
The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed.
The retrievability for Oracle Cloud Object Storage could be made simpler through the implementation of a GUI interface to retrieve data.
I am also interested in learning about the Oracle Cloud Storage data durability and high availability features of the product.
 

Setup Cost

Azure NetApp Files pricing is premium yet justified by features like management, scalability, and flexible licensing options.
Opinions on Oracle Cloud Object Storage pricing vary, with options for subscriptions, credits, and flexible payment models impacting costs.
It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it is very inexpensive.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud is comparable to other cloud providers.
It is an expensive product.
 

Valuable Features

Azure NetApp Files enhances performance, scalability, and management with integrated features for backup, recovery, and seamless Azure integration.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides scalable, secure storage with high availability, cost-effectiveness, and comprehensive features like multi-region support.
The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes.
It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly.
I find manageability, scalability, and security of the product most valuable.
The system protects information through implementation of security features such as WAF and virtual networks.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (9th)
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 7.6%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oracle Cloud Object Storage3.9%
Azure NetApp Files7.6%
Other88.5%
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13 - PeerSpot reviewer
Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs
The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.
PriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewer
A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement
There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?
Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...
What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?
The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...
What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The pricing for Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it is very inexpensive.
What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The usability of Oracle Cloud Object Storage could be enhanced, as retrieving data can be complicated unless one knows the correct method. For instance, when taking a backup for cloning purposes, t...
 

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic
Brinks
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.