Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8. Microsoft holds a 2.4% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Read 56 Microsoft Azure Object Storage reviews
  • 569 Views
  • 558 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Read 10 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews
  • 841 Views
  • 757 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage compete in the cloud data storage category. Oracle Cloud Object Storage has the upper hand due to its extensive features, especially in data management and analytics.

Features: Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers seamless integration with existing Microsoft services, high scalability, and strong security features. Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides comprehensive data management tools, efficient tiered storage, and advanced analytics capabilities. Oracle Cloud tends to have a stronger feature set, particularly in data management and analytics.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Object Storage could enhance its cost management and provide more detailed performance analytics. Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs improvement in technical documentation and reduction in support response times. Even though both products have improvement areas, the feedback is more critical for Oracle Cloud's documentation and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users report smooth deployment experiences due to comprehensive support and detailed onboarding resources. Oracle Cloud Object Storage users find the deployment process straightforward but occasionally less responsive customer service hampers it. Microsoft Azure is more favorable for deployment with better customer service response.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users report reasonable setup costs with good ROI when leveraging existing Microsoft investments. Oracle Cloud Object Storage users note higher initial setup costs justified by superior performance and advanced features, yielding high ROI. Microsoft Azure is seen as cost-effective, while Oracle Cloud offers better long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 871,469 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.4
Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides scalable cloud storage with mixed reviews on ROI and market fit; financial benefits vary.
Sentiment score
4.7
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is secure, cost-effective, and highly rated for code backup and deployment, despite modest financial returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Azure Object Storage support is generally effective but varies by plan and location, with room for improvement.
Sentiment score
4.6
Oracle Cloud Object Storage offers satisfactory support, with mixed reviews on response times and expertise, improved by premium subscriptions.
If I want to change something on my resources or directly access it via the portal, there is not a service level agreement of 100%, and sometimes it's quite difficult to access.
Technical support from Microsoft is good.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Object Storage report
When issues arise, it takes them at least three to four hours to respond.
I have a premium subscription for Oracle Cloud, which ensures a high level of support.
Oracle is more cost-effective than competitors.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Cloud Object Storage report
Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewer
PS
PriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewerSATHISH KUMAR DEENADAYALAN - PeerSpot reviewerTapas Karmakar - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Azure Object Storage excels in scalability, overcoming minor challenges, effectively supporting diverse user needs and large-scale growth.
Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is praised for its scalable, flexible management, allowing seamless resource adjustment and efficient growth.
The storage is very scalable, so you can effortlessly scale it.
The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes.
Most of the time, it fits the requirement, but for drastic demands, we may need to provide quotas and other requirements to Microsoft for them to manage forecast and capacity planning.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Object Storage report
The scalability of Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it can be scaled easily.
We can adjust the number of CPUs as per our need and reduce the load.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Cloud Object Storage report
Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewerAnimesh.Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
PS
SureshKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
MK
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is stable and reliable, with minimal issues mainly during initial implementation or due to partners.
Sentiment score
7.3
Oracle Cloud Object Storage is highly stable and reliable, consistently rated positively for availability and performance by users.
The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes.
From a security standpoint, there is a question mark due to past cyber attacks.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Object Storage report
The system is stable, especially when set up in a single region.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Cloud Object Storage report
Animesh.Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
PS
SATHISH KUMAR DEENADAYALAN - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs performance, cost, support, user interface, API stability, integration, pricing clarity, scalability, auto-scaling, and security improvements.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs enhanced security, improved integration, better usability, and features similar to Azure and AWS.
When using Data Lakes for analytics and frequently pulling data from our source database to Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, there should be faster methods to download large data from Microsoft Azure Storage Blob to different locations.
They need enhancement in security aspects. Security alerts and integrations could be improved as part of lifecycle management, especially for archives and restoration requirements.
The improvement needed for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is to reduce the transactional charges, as these read and write operation charges are higher.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Object Storage report
The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed.
I would like to know about integration with other Oracle Cloud services and whether it is easy to integrate Oracle Cloud Object Storage with other Oracle Cloud solutions.
The retrievability for Oracle Cloud Object Storage could be made simpler through the implementation of a GUI interface to retrieve data.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Cloud Object Storage report
Animesh.Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
PS
AK
PriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewerTapas Karmakar - PeerSpot reviewerSureshKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure Object Storage's pricing is competitive but can be confusing and high for intensive use, with extra support charges.
Opinions on Oracle Cloud Object Storage pricing vary, with options for subscriptions, credits, and flexible payment models impacting costs.
It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value.
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers.
Regarding pricing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage, I find it reasonable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Object Storage report
The pricing for Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it is very inexpensive.
It is an expensive product.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud is comparable to other cloud providers.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Cloud Object Storage report
Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewer
AK
RY
SureshKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewerPriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewerSATHISH KUMAR DEENADAYALAN - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides scalability, cost efficiency, security, and integration features with strong metadata and disaster recovery capabilities.
Oracle Cloud Object Storage provides scalable, secure storage with high availability, cost-effectiveness, and comprehensive features like multi-region support.
Since I work mostly with AI/ML, data piping, data integrations, and ETL tools, these features are valuable.
When talking about storage accounts, customers utilize Azure file as a replica of the file server, allowing them to access file shares or storage accounts from their systems, making it easy to use while automatically syncing data with the cloud.
The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Object Storage report
High availability, a large dataset, and stability are our main criteria for using this solution.
I find manageability, scalability, and security of the product most valuable.
It also provides multi-region support, enhancing data accessibility and safety.
For more quotes and insights, download the Oracle Cloud Object Storage report
Animesh.Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
AK
Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewerPriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewer
MK
SATHISH KUMAR DEENADAYALAN - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oracle Cloud Object Storage3.9%
Microsoft Azure Object Storage2.4%
Other93.7%
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides versatile data storage solutions with a simple setup and easy to use
It's similar to S3 for AWS. The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial. For example, you can transform data from relational databases, flatten it, and store it in Object storage to save space within the databases. If I want to save data and do not require legacy access, it's a good solution, for instance, to migrate archives from databases to Object storage. This can also be used for business intelligence purposes. Having a storage solution for data makes it the best place to store it. Azure has its own solution for StatsQ Web Apps.
Read full review
PriyankShrivastava - PeerSpot reviewer
A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement
There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The layout of Microsoft is professional.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers. They also get multiple servic...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The improvement needed for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is to reduce the transactional charges, as these read and write operation charges are higher. If reduced, we could engage more customers. M...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
The pricing for Oracle Cloud Object Storage deserves a perfect ten as it is very inexpensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?
We have support but haven't had a reason to use the backup and recovery features.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 33% of the time
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 23% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Competitors
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 34% of the time
Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 13% of the time
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 12% of the time
Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Compared 6% of the time
More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
October 2025
Microsoft Azure Object Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure Object Storage product report
Buyer's Guide
Public Cloud Storage Services
September 2025
Oracle Cloud Object Storage reportDownload Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
No data available
 

Overview

REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

  • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
  • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
  • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
  • Power big data analytics
  • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
Microsoft

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Brinks
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
September 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.