Google Cloud Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are prominent cloud storage solutions with distinct strengths. Users tend to prefer Google Cloud Storage for its comprehensive features and ease of deployment, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage impresses with its high performance and ROI.
Features: Google Cloud Storage is praised for its scalability, data management, and integration capabilities. Oracle Cloud Object Storage is noted for its performance, security features, and reliability.
Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage users suggest enhancing support services and reducing complexity in navigating services. Oracle Cloud Object Storage receives feedback for improving documentation and lowering costs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is favored for its straightforward deployment process and extensive documentation. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, while robust, demands more technical expertise.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage offers competitive pricing and an appealing ROI. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, though more expensive, delivers higher performance.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
I have a premium subscription for Oracle Cloud, which ensures a high level of support.
Sometimes, the expertise of those who come on call is not adequate.
Oracle is more cost-effective than competitors.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
We can adjust the number of CPUs as per our need and reduce the load.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
The system is stable, especially when set up in a single region.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed.
I am also interested in learning about the Oracle Cloud Storage data durability and high availability features of the product.
I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS.
Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
The pricing for Oracle Cloud is comparable to other cloud providers.
It is an expensive product.
We have to pay the price, and the cost is higher.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
I find manageability, scalability, and security of the product most valuable.
High availability, a large dataset, and stability are our main criteria for using this solution.
It also provides multi-region support, enhancing data accessibility and safety.
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.
Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.
Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements
Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
