Google Cloud Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. Google holds a 9.7% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 78 Google Cloud Storage reviews

3,266 Views
2,146 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Read 6 Oracle Cloud Object Storage reviews

896 Views
804 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage are prominent cloud storage solutions with distinct strengths. Users tend to prefer Google Cloud Storage for its comprehensive features and ease of deployment, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage impresses with its high performance and ROI.

Features: Google Cloud Storage is praised for its scalability, data management, and integration capabilities. Oracle Cloud Object Storage is noted for its performance, security features, and reliability.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage users suggest enhancing support services and reducing complexity in navigating services. Oracle Cloud Object Storage receives feedback for improving documentation and lowering costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is favored for its straightforward deployment process and extensive documentation. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, while robust, demands more technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage offers competitive pricing and an appealing ROI. Oracle Cloud Object Storage, though more expensive, delivers higher performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (2nd)

Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 9.7%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Cloud Object Storage is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai

Managing Partner at Cloud Analytics Sdn Bhd

User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks

While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.

Read full review

PriyankShrivastava

Sr Quality Engineer at Accenture

A workhorse that enables high availability but support has room for improvement

There is always room for improvement. When a product is marketed, many claims are made, but in reality, it does not always perform as expected. The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced. The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Any developer can study and implement what we do for cloud operations with the database side. It's not a big deal for developers. They can implement things using Google Cloud Storage."

"The responses from the technical team are fast...It is a stable product...We do have plans to increase the number of users since it is a scalable product."

"You do not need to install anything."

"There's no implementation process."

"Google Cloud Storage's most valuable features are that it's easy to use and navigate, and it's not expensive."

"From a stability standpoint, the solution is excellent. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is reliability."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage is valuable for storing unstructured data, such as text documents and word documents."

"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."

"We use it mostly in the cloud. It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

"The technical support for the solution was very nice."

"It is stable, requires high availability, and works with large datasets seamlessly."

"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

Cons

"I'd like the solution to integrate better with other clouds, including the Apple cloud."

"The user interface could be more intuitive."

"I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics."

"The implementation is not as easy as Microsoft, and the process could be improved."

"The problem I face right now is that my data warehouse is being hosted on Google Cloud, however, integration between Google Cloud to Microsoft Azure is a big problem."

"The user experience needs to be simplified."

"Google Cloud Storage could improve by being more user-friendly."

"I don't find the solution very user-friendly."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"I could not find a load balancer in OCI similar to the support provided by Microsoft Azure and AWS."

"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."

"The usability and real-time capabilities could be enhanced."

"Cost-wise, it is not an affordable tool if you allocate space, and try to use it some other day."

"The product can be difficult to use compared to how it is marketed. Technical support also lacks a timely response."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."

"I use the free version and have never paid for any extra storage. I have been able to manage in whatever free spaces are given."

"The solution was very cheap compared to other products."

"I am paying a yearly subscription fee."

"The price of Google Cloud Storage is reasonable when compared to other similar solutions."

"There are no licensing fees."

"There is a license needed to use Google Cloud Storage at our university."

"The tool is not expensive."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly subscription for the product."

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."

"Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."

"During the billing cycle, if I use the tool only for a day, I still need to pay you for a month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

70%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

It is an expensive product. We do not use a monthly plan; instead, we opt for a quarterly or semi-annual licensing model, which we negotiate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Object Storage?

See all answers

Comparisons

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Akamai NetStorage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 45% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

May 2025

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

May 2025

Download Oracle Cloud Object Storage product report

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Google

Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

Oracle

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

Brinks

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.