

Find out in this report how the two Open Source Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
It offers at least 25 percent cost savings compared to maintaining on-premises databases.
Now, we use embedded PostgreSQL vectors, which will undoubtedly reduce the TCO by using a much more cost-effective solution.
We've reduced our total ownership cost because we are not spending on expensive SQL server licenses.
What was projected for a three-year hardware lifespan extended to five years, yielding a return on investment of more than two times from migrating from MySQL to Percona Server.
I have seen a return on investment from using Percona Server, especially in terms of time, as time to resolve issues and time to get notified mean that time is a lot of money.
Once we open a support case, we have people engaged within about 20 minutes, especially for a Sev 1 issue.
On a scale from one to ten, I rate customer service and technical support a nine because they are quick in responding and in working with me to rectify any issues we come across.
The documentation and training we've received through Microsoft Learn on how to migrate, deploy, and manage the solution is exceptional.
Percona Server's customer support is excellent with very responsive and friendly service.
support was quite helpful in assisting us with archivers, replicators, and other commands.
We do not have to buy everything and build it. It is already there.
However, we can see how well it scales after we deploy it for some large enterprise customers or big government organizations.
The scaling options with FlexServer provide us with the flexibility we need based on application complexity.
Percona Server's scalability is very strong, as it features thread pooling for over 10,000 connections.
We find it is easy to scale out and scale in using Percona Operator, Percona XtraDB toolkits, and PXC XtraDB Cluster.
Percona Server's scalability meets our needs well, as we use it in Docker and scale the way we want with multiple MongoDB servers rather than one huge server.
It is the go-to database if seeking performance and capacity.
I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues; it has been very stable.
There is a stability issue where, if the database usage peaks quickly, it may crash and require intervention to restore functionality.
Percona Server is perfectly stable and reliable.
Percona Server is very stable in my experience.
Percona Server is stable based on my experience.
It does not presently support knowledge graph functionalities as Neo4j does.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved by allowing quicker scaling without blips.
I believe there could be improvements in the mirroring part and Change Data Capture (CDC).
It would be helpful to clarify the metrics related to disk I/O latency so we could understand where our bottlenecks are.
I believe it would be great to have tools to deploy Percona Server in Docker so that we can split a huge database server into many small servers, which are easier to maintain and delegate to junior administrators.
The introduction of materialized views in Percona Server would be a significant help, as this feature has been requested for a long time.
We've reduced costs by 60 percent compared to maintaining on-premises solutions.
We chose it because it is more cost-effective than Microsoft SQL.
Once you are comfortable and ready to make some commitments, you get about 30 percent saving if you are going with one-year or three-year reservation cost.
What I appreciated was that they packaged support with the licenses, ensuring that we ended up with a working database.
we received the enterprise features for free
My takeaway as a CTO is that they're comfortable with the security posture, the features, the observability, alerts, and now it integrates into the rest of the Azure landscape.
The query analyzers help me find out what's happening in each of the queries.
If a database has any task that has been interrupted or any connection issue, it will alert LogicMonitor, and we have a centralized panel for all the alerts.
Percona Kubernetes for MongoDB is a unique offering since no other companies provide a proper Kubernetes operator that supports deployment, maintenance, and backup.
Percona Server has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to save a ton of money by not having to use RDS or Aurora in Amazon.
Whenever there is an issue, Percona Server notifies us, and we resolve the issue immediately.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Database for PostgreSQL | 1.9% |
| Percona Server | 2.4% |
| Other | 95.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.
With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.
What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.
Percona Server is a MySQL alternative offering improved performance and scalability for databases used in demanding environments. It is tailored for companies requiring reliable data management, ensuring efficiency and flexibility in operations.
Percona Server enhances MySQL with numerous features that boost database performance, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. Known for its ability to handle heavy workloads, users count on Percona Server to maintain operational consistency even under significant demand. Its security and compatibility with MySQL are additional benefits, providing a seamless transition for existing MySQL users. Organizations focused on cost-efficiency and high performance often consider Percona Server as a strong, open-source solution.
What are Percona Server's features?In industries such as e-commerce, telecommunication, and finance, Percona Server is implemented to maintain high transaction volumes and ensure robust data security. Its utility in managing complex database demands makes it a preferred choice in sectors where data integrity and performance are crucial.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.