

Amazon RDS and Azure Database for PostgreSQL compete in the cloud-based database service market. Amazon RDS has the upper hand due to comprehensive features and deployment flexibility, while Azure focuses on seamless integration and ease of use.
Features: Amazon RDS offers deployment agility, an on-demand service for various databases, and turnkey setup with multi-availability zone features for high availability. It supports multiple databases, making it easy to implement a microservices architecture and automate tasks like backups, enhancing DBA efficiency. Azure Database for PostgreSQL provides seamless integrations, strong networking capabilities, and supports AI features, with robust monitoring and observability tools.
Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS struggles with complex migrations, limited shell access, and default settings requiring user activation. Pricing and technical support need improvement, alongside SQL patching and sandboxing. Azure Database for PostgreSQL could improve performance monitoring, cost management, and user addition capabilities. Flexibility in server resources and anomaly detection are also areas for development.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS supports public cloud deployments and private and hybrid setups. Its customer service quality varies, with premium support being better. Azure Database for PostgreSQL is optimized for public cloud use, with positive feedback for support despite some desire for faster responses and initial support quality.
Pricing and ROI: Both Amazon RDS and Azure Database for PostgreSQL use a pay-as-you-go pricing model, minimizing initial hardware investment. Amazon RDS is cost-effective with strategic provisioning but challenging due to high prices and hidden costs. Azure offers cost savings with flexible pricing that scales, supporting smaller scale-ups with competitive options. Strategic provisioning is essential to optimize costs for Amazon RDS, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL is ideal for smaller enterprises due to competitive pricing.
It offers at least 25 percent cost savings compared to maintaining on-premises databases.
Now, we use embedded PostgreSQL vectors, which will undoubtedly reduce the TCO by using a much more cost-effective solution.
We've reduced our total ownership cost because we are not spending on expensive SQL server licenses.
The documentation is quite good.
The official AWS technical support for Amazon RDS is helpful, providing 24/7 assistance for all business support cases with tools such as the health dashboard and AWS trusted advisor.
I would rate the support from AWS very high, maybe nine, but it also depends on what kind of support you have signed in your contract, whether the premium support or the standard support.
Once we open a support case, we have people engaged within about 20 minutes, especially for a Sev 1 issue.
The documentation and training we've received through Microsoft Learn on how to migrate, deploy, and manage the solution is exceptional.
We handle most implementations in-house, without extensive reliance on Microsoft's technical support.
Its automated scaling, both in storage and instances, is vital as it eliminates manual interventions.
The installation of Amazon RDS is quite easy and quite scalable.
Despite being a strong feature, scalability could be improved due to the lack of full functionality in autoscaling.
However, we can see how well it scales after we deploy it for some large enterprise customers or big government organizations.
The scaling options with FlexServer provide us with the flexibility we need based on application complexity.
We can scale up compute and scale it down, but once storage is allocated, there is no way to scale it back down.
Amazon RDS is very stable when deployed correctly across different zones with the right configurations.
It is a stable product overall, with very few issues.
Amazon RDS is quite stable, and the SLAs are sort of 99.98%.
There is a stability issue where, if the database usage peaks quickly, it may crash and require intervention to restore functionality.
We have generative AI applications, and we have not noticed any latency.
Overall, I have not encountered any real latency issues or stability concerns.
Simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments.
Having native Change Data Capture (CDC) support would be beneficial, allowing for seamless integration with Kafka without relying on external technologies like Debezium.
Enabling performance insights to view query formats where the bottlenecks occur, identifying the fixes, slow queries, and missing indexes.
It does not presently support knowledge graph functionalities as Neo4j does.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved by allowing quicker scaling without blips.
I believe there could be improvements in the mirroring part and Change Data Capture (CDC).
While Azure provides great services, long-term plans on AWS are 20% to 30% cheaper.
I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model.
I rate the price for Amazon as eight on a scale from one to ten.
We've reduced costs by 60 percent compared to maintaining on-premises solutions.
The pay-as-you-go pricing model positively affects database-related costs by allowing us to start small and scale as needed.
The pay-as-you-go model works well for us.
Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS.
Database management is effective in Amazon RDS because it offers automated backups, high availability, read replicas, and support from multiple database engineers, while also providing security, monitoring and metrics, scalability.
In some cases, we are using the read replica feature, and it does improve our application performance because we do not allow any downstream system to come to the main storage or main databases and perform a query.
My takeaway as a CTO is that they're comfortable with the security posture, the features, the observability, alerts, and now it integrates into the rest of the Azure landscape.
The query analyzers help me find out what's happening in each of the queries.
The most valuable features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL are its networking capabilities, which allow for integration with other Azure services.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon RDS | 19.1% |
| Azure Database for PostgreSQL | 2.9% |
| Other | 78.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.
With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.
What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.
We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.