EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs Percona Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?

EnterpriseDB and Percona are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. EnterpriseDB is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Percona is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. EnterpriseDB holds a 2.3% mindshare in OSD, compared to Percona’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of EnterpriseDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Percona users who would recommend it.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Read 12 EDB Postgres Advanced Server reviews

2,093 Views
2,093 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Percona Server

Read 12 Percona Server reviews

1,588 Views
1,588 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Percona Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Percona Server and EDB Postgres Advanced Server compete in the database solutions category. Percona Server appears to have the advantage in cost-effectiveness and deployment simplicity, while EDB Postgres Advanced Server leads in advanced functionality.

Features: Percona Server provides enhanced performance, secure integration, and a proactive support model. EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers high-end security features, Oracle compatibility, and enriched data management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Percona Server is known for a straightforward deployment process and solid community support, though its service can sometimes lack customization. EDB Postgres Advanced Server may be more complex to implement but offers structured support packages tailored for personalized service.

Pricing and ROI: Percona Server is recognized for its lower setup costs, benefiting businesses focused on minimizing expenses. EDB Postgres Advanced Server requires a higher initial investment but provides long-term value with its advanced features and dedicated support.

To learn more, read our detailed EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. Percona Server Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. Percona Server

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Percona Server

Ranking in Open Source Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of EDB Postgres Advanced Server is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Percona Server is 2.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Percona Server	2.4%
EDB Postgres Advanced Server	2.3%
Other	95.3%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Shardul Borhade

Database Engineer at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees

Centralized management has reduced database overhead but pricing and documentation have needed work

What I appreciate about EDB Postgres Advanced Server is that it offers management tools such as PEM and CNPG under one umbrella, providing enterprise features that eliminate the need for multiple engineers to maintain PostgreSQL databases, although it is somewhat expensive. I evaluate the technical support and customer service of EDB Postgres Advanced Server as really good, as I have sought their help three to four times regarding issues with PEM configuration, and they respond quickly and solve issues promptly. I would rate the technical support of EDB Postgres Advanced Server an 8 out of 10. EDB Postgres Advanced Server's high availability and disaster recovery features, specifically the introduction of CNPG based on Kubernetes, are good, but they require significant infrastructure overhead, which I believe necessitates a lightweight integration model for better performance. I rate the efficiency improvements from EDB Postgres Advanced Server a 10 out of 10 when it comes to Oracle compatibility. Its native support for Oracle's PL/SQL syntax makes evaluating and migrating legacy workloads incredibly smooth, bypassing the typical headaches of manual code rewrites.

Read full review

Pieter Geelen

Freelancer at geelen.io

Reliable open-source database has supported our migration and improved e-commerce performance

Percona Server seems great to me overall. If I had to think of any small area for improvement for Percona Server, it would be around the proxy story. When adding a proxy to manage traffic better, we first tried SQL Proxy, but it never really worked for us, which was unfortunate because SQL Proxy offers better optimizations for read performance. We did have success with HAProxy, but it works on a network level, while SQL Proxy was designed to be SQL-aware and distribute parts of the query across the database cluster. The performance gain we were hoping for with SQL Proxy did not materialize, so we remained on the network level with HAProxy. Databases can be finicky regarding the performance they need. We had some disk I/O latency issues, which led us to use different types of nodes in our Kubernetes cluster where we provisioned Percona Server explicitly. There is a lot of IOPS happening under the hood, and while I suspect the application was not very efficient, it was also challenging to identify that we were experiencing performance issues due to disk performance. It would be helpful to clarify the metrics related to disk I/O latency so we could understand where our bottlenecks are.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives us a solid, less expensive alternative to deploying with Oracle."

"Postgres is highly compatible with many software and programming languages. Its compatibility is excellent, covering nearly everything related to data engineering or migration."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server has positively impacted my organization by being cost-saving compared to databases such as Oracle, while providing smooth performance that simplifies production operations with less downtime and effort, especially in a cloud environment where we can utilize containerized services."

"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."

"This product has allowed us to reduce costs in some parts of our infrastructure without losing functionality."

"The number of indices available in Postgres is remarkable."

"The backup utility tools such as pg_restore and pg_dump are really convenient and efficient tools to handle backup and recovery."

"I would highly recommend EDB Postgres Advanced Server to others."

Cons

"For improvement purposes, I think EDB Postgres Advanced Server needs some enhanced monitoring since the current default monitoring is not sufficient; an EDB monitoring tool could provide useful metrics to help end users avoid production issues."

"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."

"The lack of additional security features is really the thing that makes the product less useful."

"Setting up MySQL is slightly more straightforward than Postgres."

"The product currently fails to offer a mobile application."

"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."

"Lighter integration model for containerized deployment. Effectively, there still remain some issues with a containerized deployment, so we have opted for a non-containerized deployment."

"Postgres performance is suffering and the product model is not doing enough to keep current."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have been working on the community edition."

"The product is either free with community support or very inexpensive with a small yearly fee for paid support."

"Pricing is significantly lower than competing products."

"It is an open-source product."

"EDB Postgres Advanced Server is open source, so I don't pay for licensing."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

26%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

We obtained EPAS through our partnership with EDB using an enterprise deployment model on-premises. From a pure testing perspective for a startup like DBtune, the licensing can feel quite expensive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Beyond the aspects that I mentioned about the enterprise manager PEM and UI complexities, I would like to see improvements in the pricing structure to accommodate startups and clearer centralized d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

The main use case for EDB Postgres Advanced Server (EPAS) is within my work at DBtune, an AI-driven SaaS product for database optimization. I am responsible for developing and testing our platform'...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Percona Server?

Since I used the free tier, my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that it was the best model available at the time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Percona Server?

I have limited experience to provide detailed insights about needed improvements. Visibility and advertisement are the improvements I think Percona Server needs.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Percona Server?

I was using Percona Server as a MySQL database replacement for an application that needed a database in the background to manage tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 18% of the time

YugabyteDB vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 8% of the time

MySQL vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs EDB Postgres Advanced Server

Compared 6% of the time

More EDB Postgres Advanced Server Competitors

MariaDB vs Percona Server

Compared 19% of the time

MySQL vs Percona Server

Compared 18% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Percona Server

Compared 11% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Percona Server

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs Percona Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Percona Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server

September 2026

Download EDB Postgres Advanced Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Percona Server

September 2026

Download Percona Server product report

Overview

EDB Postgres Advanced Server offers robust database solutions with standout configurations and flexible support, ideal for demanding environments.

EDB Postgres Advanced Server addresses diverse database needs with advanced tools and configurations. Efficiently managing distributed databases and supporting high availability with Patroni cluster deployment, it provides superior backup solutions and cost-efficient licensing compared to Oracle. Its compatibility with Oracle and vector database management for AI make it suitable for middle and lower-tier clients. However, areas like performance enhancement for large-scale operations, containerized deployments, and better monitoring require attention.

What are the key features of EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Standout Configurations: Offers flexibility and a wide range of indices for varied needs.
Patroni Cluster Deployment: Ensures high availability for critical applications.
JSONB Support: Provides enhanced management of JSON data.
Cost-Efficient Licensing: More affordable than Oracle for budget-conscious organizations.
Built-In Scripting: Simplifies automation tasks with ease.
PgAdmin Metrics Insights: Delivers valuable database performance metrics.

Why should users consider EDB Postgres Advanced Server?

Oracle Compatibility: Smooth transition for users familiar with Oracle systems.
AI Database Management: Accommodates vector databases crucial for AI workloads.
Multitenancy: Supports multiple users, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.
Impressive Speed: Facilitates quick data processing for demanding tasks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overall database expenditure.

Organizations deploy EDB Postgres Advanced Server to replace Oracle RAC and manage tasks requiring multiple servers and distributed data access. Educational institutions utilize it for examining architecture and development, with global data centers harnessing its capabilities for engineering endeavors. Academic purposes include teaching database fundamentals and aiding Oracle migrations, while aligning with on-premises deployments due to specific restrictions.

EnterpriseDB

Percona Server is a MySQL alternative offering improved performance and scalability for databases used in demanding environments. It is tailored for companies requiring reliable data management, ensuring efficiency and flexibility in operations.

Percona Server enhances MySQL with numerous features that boost database performance, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. Known for its ability to handle heavy workloads, users count on Percona Server to maintain operational consistency even under significant demand. Its security and compatibility with MySQL are additional benefits, providing a seamless transition for existing MySQL users. Organizations focused on cost-efficiency and high performance often consider Percona Server as a strong, open-source solution.

What are Percona Server's features?

Advanced Scalability: Supports large deployments with ease.
Enhanced Security: Offers improved security measures for data protection.
High Availability: Ensures continuous operation with minimal downtime.
Performance Optimization: Increases efficiency in data processing.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Provides a cost-effective alternative to other database systems.
Reliability: Ensures stable performance for critical database applications.
Community Support: Benefits from a comprehensive and active user community.

In industries such as e-commerce, telecommunication, and finance, Percona Server is implemented to maintain high transaction volumes and ensure robust data security. Its utility in managing complex database demands makes it a preferred choice in sectors where data integrity and performance are crucial.

Percona

Sample Customers

Ericsson, Clear Capital, PinkRoccade, ABN Amro, WholeWorldBand, Van Genechten, Gallinat-Bank AG, Mariner, coresystems, Aquent, Contegix, AQA, Genscape, InMobi

Pricefalls Marketplace, Micpoint, Rent the Runway, Transmart, Wattpad, Singular Group, Invoca, 3E

Buyer's Guide

EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. Percona Server

September 2026

Free Report: EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. Percona Server

Find out what your peers are saying about EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. Percona Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. Percona Server report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.