We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have been using drivers to connect to various data sets and consume data."
"The data mapping and the ability to systematically derive data are nice features. It worked really well for the solution we had. It is visual, and it did the transformation as we wanted."
"The solution can scale very easily."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and the readily available adapters for connecting with various sources."
"The most valuable feature is the ease in which you can create an ETL pipeline."
"The two most valuable features of Azure Data Factory are that it's very scalable and that it's also highly reliable."
"What I like best about Azure Data Factory is that it allows you to create pipelines, specifically ETL pipelines. I also like that Azure Data Factory has connectors and solves most of my company's problems."
"It is easy to integrate."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The solution is scalable."
"The setup and configuration process could be simplified."
"Real-time replication is required, and this is not a simple task."
"Some of the optimization techniques are not scalable."
"The solution needs to integrate more with other providers and should have a closer integration with Oracle BI."
"We have experienced some issues with the integration. This is an area that needs improvement."
"The Microsoft documentation is too complicated."
"There is always room to improve. There should be good examples of use that, of course, customers aren't always willing to share. It is Catch-22. It would help the user base if everybody had really good examples of deployments that worked, but when you ask people to put out their good deployments, which also includes me, you usually got, "No, I'm not going to do that." They don't have enough good examples. Microsoft probably just needs to pay one of their partners to build 20 or 30 examples of functional Data Factories and then share them as a user base."
"The pricing model should be more transparent and available online."
"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
Azure Data Factory is ranked 1st in Data Integration with 81 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and HyperScience. See our Azure Data Factory vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
